[video=youtube;KpJ5RREy5uQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpJ5RREy5uQ[/video]
An exciting new series is kicked off with a quick and satisfying review of critically acclaimed FPS/RPG/MMO game Fallout 4.
Oh god I need more of it
Damn, Coby.
[QUOTE=matt000024;49303079]Damn, Coby.[/QUOTE]
Kobe's gonna be pissed if he sees you spelled his name incorrectly. He's playing Duck Game for the next four days straight, though, so you have time to get yourself sorted out.
Probably would have been funnier if it wasn't someone sharing an unpopular opinion on a popular game just for views.
[QUOTE=IliekBoxes;49303300]Probably would have been funnier if it wasn't someone sharing an unpopular opinion on a popular game just for views.[/QUOTE]
Absolutely correct. As you can tell from the other content hosted on my channel, views are extremely important to me. I quit my job three years ago and use youtube as my primary source of income. Please, view my video over and over again. View it until your parents/siblings/roommates ask why you've been watching the same video for three hours, and then view it some more.
Unpopular opinion time
I loved fallout 4 for what it was.
[QUOTE=Lord of Boxes;49303586]Unpopular opinion time
I loved fallout 4 for what it was.[/QUOTE]
make a video about it
[QUOTE=Lord of Boxes;49303586]Unpopular opinion time
I loved fallout 4 for what it was.[/QUOTE]
I loved F4 for what it was, but I wish it was something else.
[QUOTE=Lord of Boxes;49303586]Unpopular opinion time
I loved fallout 4 for what it was.[/QUOTE]
I'd see it as equally or slightly less flawed than Fallout 3, but the flaws are in different places. It's weird, it's like Bethesda have a 'glaring issue' quota.
cool are we doing this now
[media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OnmKlmW7vqY[/media]
been waiting for a chance to post this since I think he's got it relatively spot-on in terms of the game's actual design as oppose to just constant talking about bugs and such
[QUOTE=IliekBoxes;49303300]Probably would have been funnier if it wasn't someone sharing an unpopular opinion on a popular game just for views.[/QUOTE]
You've gotta be shitting me?
I got pissed off when Angry Joe claimed 8/10 on this game when it's got the story telling and RPG elements of Call of Duty, that is point and click maybe sometimes skip dialogs cause who reads in a first person shooter anyways right? Because that's what the fallout series is, a first person shooter right? [I]RIGHT???[/I]
The game's got less than 0% related to the original series, it's just a generic ass morowing mod.
Goddammit Kobe! You fucking missed!
This channel is absolutely beautiful and i love it to bits.
[video=youtube;Nfu8Vu-N5qo]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nfu8Vu-N5qo[/video]
[QUOTE=Lord of Boxes;49303586]Unpopular opinion time
I loved fallout 4 for what it was.[/QUOTE]
I wish I could love it. But I have encountered some massive gamebreaking bugs.
[QUOTE=DMGaina;49304218]I wish I could love it. But I have encountered some massive gamebreaking bugs.[/QUOTE]
They are features.
[QUOTE=NeuFeX;49304933]They are features.[/QUOTE]
He was just stating his opinion politely, no reason start a bandwagon.
[QUOTE=IliekBoxes;49303300]Probably would have been funnier if it wasn't someone sharing an unpopular opinion on a popular game just for views.[/QUOTE]
"Would have been funnier if it agreed with me"
Eh, I'm glad they simplified the gameplay. I just want more quests that aren't "clear out this area"
This reminds me a lot of BESTGAMERS, come to think of it. I like it a lot.
[QUOTE=RaxaHax;49305584]"Would have been funnier if it agreed with me"[/QUOTE]
That's why facepunch can't handle worth a buy's channel they can't handle it When a man says its flatout shit with 25 years of gaming experience
[QUOTE=650leetARIMI;49306319]That's why facepunch can't handle worth a buy's channel they can't handle it When a man says its flatout shit with 25 years of gaming experience[/QUOTE]
Okay? Why does it matter if the guy has 25 years of experience? Not to mention that's his opinion, and not others.
[QUOTE=650leetARIMI;49306319]That's why facepunch can't handle worth a buy's channel they can't handle it When a man says its flatout shit with 25 years of gaming experience[/QUOTE]
I can't handle worth a buy's channel because the guy's a shithead who from what I've seen rates games based on what will get him the most attention (for example giving Hatred a thumbs up)
[QUOTE=Lord of Boxes;49303586]Unpopular opinion time
I loved fallout 4 for what it was.[/QUOTE]
I liked fallout 4 but it felt like it was a game with the quality of a good 2010 game at best
[QUOTE=Zang-Pog;49303343]It's not really an unpopular opinion since most people who actually care for RPGs say it's complete doodoo[/QUOTE]
I love RPGs and I'm not an elitist shithead who feels the need to crap all over a game for having half decent gameplay. Anyone who was expecting New Vegas 2 is a fucking idiot, have you people never heard of having realistic expectations?
[QUOTE=Janus Vesta;49307279]I love RPGs and I'm not an elitist shithead who feels the need to crap all over a game for having half decent gameplay. Anyone who was expecting New Vegas 2 is a fucking idiot, have you people never heard of having realistic expectations?[/QUOTE]
Who craps over the game for having half decent gameplay? Just because the gameplay is better doesn't mean that's the source of everyone's grievances.
Bethesda and their games should be held to the same standards as the other games in the series, whether or not that is realistic. Nobody has any obligation to give Bethesda a free pass just because they've got a history.
The one thing that makes me appreciate Bethesda games is the ability for the community over the course of 4 years, to redevelop their games. Skyrim would've probably not be on the top 10 played games on steam for 4 years if the modding community was around. Actually, I'm pretty sure it would've slid into the dust. But that applies to all of their titles. They're only good because people make them that good. The unofficial patches are probably the saving grace for their games.
Opinion time:
Personally, I felt like Fallout 4 accentuated their flaws more visibly. Bland dialog, seriously where the fuck did they find the voice actor for Preston? Gameplay mechanics in immersion (hardcore mode would be appreciated) leveling system (i personally liked fo1/2,nvs perk/leveling system) and i can go on about this. I most undoubtedly bet the only way I will make fallout 4 enjoyable is with mods.
Granted, i played skyrim a lot longer without mods than i did with fallout 4, i just cant enjoy the pc version of vault builder, above ground edition.
$60 was too much. and $80 is way to fucking much.
[QUOTE=Janus Vesta;49307279]I love RPGs and I'm not an elitist shithead who feels the need to crap all over a game for having half decent gameplay. Anyone who was expecting New Vegas 2 is a fucking idiot, have you people never heard of having realistic expectations?[/QUOTE]
Great argument.
[QUOTE=Zang-Pog;49307504]I'm really sick of this " Oh it's Bethesda, it's completely fine guys " attitude some people seem to have.
If any other developer would be releasing games like they do, you wouldn't hear the end of it but apperently it's fine since modders will fix the game.
I find it pretty hilarious that people who paid for the game themselves are the ones that need to fix up and polish the game into something actually playable[/QUOTE]
You know what would be great? If you'd stop putting words in my mouth, thanks. I didn't say a fucking word about modders fixing anything. Bitching that the writing isn't as good as New Vegas is a stupid thing to do, because Bethesda didn't make New Vegas they made Fallout 3 and the writing in Fallout 3 is astonishingly bad. Compared to Fallout 3 the story of Fallout 4 is fucking Shakespeare. I'm not saying the writing in 4 is particularly good, but I do think having realistic expectations is the least a person can do when buying a game like this.
Bethesda's writing is terrible, it always has been, and Fallout 4 is the least terrible of anything they've done. The only well written part of a Bethesda product is the Elder Scrolls lore and that was written by a guy who hasn't worked there since before Oblivion.
[QUOTE=Glent;49307366]Who craps over the game for having half decent gameplay? Just because the gameplay is better doesn't mean that's the source of everyone's grievances.
Bethesda and their games should be held to the same standards as the other games in the series, whether or not that is realistic. Nobody has any obligation to give Bethesda a free pass just because they've got a history.[/QUOTE]
I have seen quite a few people say the game is worse "because it's a shooter now", and saying they preferred when it was clunky like in Fallout 3 and New Vegas. I never Bethesda deserve a free pass, in fact I have criticised the actual problems of the game quite harshly. Expecting the game to be something it was never going to be is fucking ridiculous, expecting a game that would surpass New Vegas' writing was stupid. Bethesda have never done anything close to that, to say the story is bad or poorly written is fine but to say "It's not as good as New Vegas" is just unfair. Especially when it's clear the focus of the game was in other areas.
[QUOTE=Lolkork;49307586]It's pretty reasonable to expect that a bethesda rpg will be a good rpg[/QUOTE]
If you've never played a Bethesda RPG, sure. If you have played Morrowind, Oblivion, Fallout 3, or Skyrim you should know that their RPGs are all about going into dungeons and killing shit.
I can't tell if you're defending Fallout 4 or insulting it.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.