• Christmas Day Airplane Bomb Suspect Pleads Not Guilty
    38 replies, posted
Source: [url]http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/01/08/terror.hearing/index.html[/url] [quote=CNN.com] Umar Farouk AbdulMutallab, the man charged with trying to blow up a Northwest Airlines plane on December 25, pleaded not guilty Friday to six federal charges. AbdulMutallab was arraigned in a Michigan federal courtroom Friday afternoon. The court hearing came a day after President Obama released a report on the incident that said officials had "sufficient information" to have foiled the failed attack that but a variety of errors kept investigators from uncovering the plot. AbdulMutallab faces a federal indictment issued Wednesday, including an attempt to murder the other 289 people aboard. The seven-page indictment charges AbdulMutallab with attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction; attempted murder within the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States; willful attempt to destroy and wreck an aircraft within the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States; willfully placing a destructive device in, upon and in proximity to an aircraft within the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States; and two counts of possession of a firearm/destructive in furtherance of a crime of violence. If convicted, the 23-year-old Nigerian national faces a sentence of life in prison. The indictment said AbdulMutallab boarded Northwest Airlines Flight 253 in Amsterdam, Netherlands, on December 25, carrying a bomb concealed in his clothing and designed to be detonated "at a time of his choosing." Authorities say the bomb components included Pentaerythritol (also known as PETN, a high explosive), as well as Triacetone Triperoxide (also known as TATP, a high explosive) and other ingredients. The indictment said that, just before the jet landed at Detroit Metropolitan Airport in Michigan, "AbdulMutallab detonated the bomb, causing a fire on board flight 253." The device failed to fully detonate, instead setting off a fire at the man's seat. He was subdued and restrained by the passengers and flight crew. The airplane landed shortly thereafter, and he was taken into custody by U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers. AbdulMutallab required medical treatment and was transported to the University of Michigan Medical Center in Ann Arbor after the plane landed. Explosives expert Sydney Alford said AbdulMutallab probably used a liquid contained in a syringe to mix with a chemical he was carrying to create a fire, which was intended to ignite the TATP. That, in turn, was to detonate the PETN. But the TATP did not ignite as planned, he speculated. TATP has been cited in several terrorism cases. Najibullah Zazi, the 24-year-old Afghan citizen and U.S. resident who was arrested in September and accused of planning to carry out terrorist acts in the United States, was allegedly trying to make TATP in his motel room in Denver, Colorado. A new indictment against Richard Reid specifies that the convicted shoe bomber also used TATP. Judge Nancy Edmunds is assigned to the AbdulMutallab case and will preside over court proceedings, said Gina Balaya, spokeswoman for the U.S. Attorney, Eastern District, Michigan. The case was presented Wednesday to the grand jury, which determined probable cause to indict. Though arraignments are typically held by a magistrate judge, Edmunds may decide, based on the special circumstances and high-profile security related to the AbdulMutallab case, to handle the matter herself, Balaya said. Edmunds is expected to decide Friday on details for the arraignment and AbdulMutallab's detention, Balaya said. Attorney General Eric Holder said the investigation "has already yielded valuable intelligence that we will follow wherever it leads." "The attempted murder of 289 innocent people merits the most serious charges available, and that's what we have charged in this indictment," said U.S. Attorney Barbara L. McQuade, U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan, who is in her first week on the job. [/quote] Lol, he actually said he wasn't guilty with a plane full of witnesses?
Well, he clearly had a bomb in his underpants. So what more is there to prove?
There is no question at all in the evidence against him. It's pretty easy. Why does he even need a trial? I swear... stupid justice system.
Didn't he say "Explosive Device" when he was asked what was under his clothes by a stewardess?
I'd laugh if it got dismissed due to lack of evidence.
There sure was a party in his pants.
This is why I dislike the American Justice System
[QUOTE=TAU!;19510530]This is why I dislike the American Justice System[/QUOTE] Do you honestly think that the Judge will declare him not guilty?
[QUOTE=TAU!;19510530]This is why I dislike the American Justice System[/QUOTE] They only have to go through the bare minimum to establish his guilt LEGALLY, then they are free to execute or imprison him for life. The only reason the trial's going ahead is to not step outside the boundary of the law.
I present to the jury Exhibit A: The third-degree burns on the suspect's testicles.
Seriously, they found fizzled explosives in his underpants, and he still has the balls to plead not guilty?
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;19511510]Seriously, they found fizzled explosives in his underpants, and he still has the balls to plead not guilty?[/QUOTE] His balls were blown up.
[B]"I tripped, I swear!"[/B]
This has got to be the greatest way to say "fuck you" to the law, ever
[QUOTE=starpluck;19510718]Do you honestly think the Judge will declare him not guilty?[/QUOTE] It's not hard for a professional career-liar/manipulative fucker to persuade 12 random fucking idiots
[QUOTE=TheTalon;19513209]It's not hard for a professional career-liar/manipulative fucker to persuade 12 random fucking idiots[/QUOTE] It's not hard to punch people in the face over the internet. See, I can random statements that have no backing whatsoever too!
[QUOTE=faze;19510477]There is no question at all in the evidence against him. It's pretty easy. Why does he even need a trial? I swear... stupid justice system.[/QUOTE] Somalia is on the cutting edge when it comes to judging people without a trial, you should move there and see how it really happens.
ITT: No one understands law, and the concept of fair trials.
[QUOTE=DrLuke;19510466]he clearly had a bomb in his underpants. [/QUOTE] thats what she said
1. Tie him up at ground Zero 2. Charge $1 per punch 3. Profit
[QUOTE=The mouse;19513905]1. Tie him up at ground Zero 2. Charge $1 per punch 3. Profit[/QUOTE] Where have I seen this before...
You people don't quite understand this concept of human rights and of a fair trial for all? Why shouldn't he plead not guilty? Hes got nothing to lose for doing so since its probably going to be the death/imprisioned in the toture camps sentence either way.
Because clearly he will insist that it was only a protest against the people who own sweatshops to produce firecrackers.
Oh what a kidder he is.
[QUOTE=A.C.I.D;19525665]You people don't quite understand this concept of human rights and of a fair trial for all? Why shouldn't he plead not guilty? Hes got nothing to lose for doing so since its probably going to be the death/imprisioned in the toture camps sentence either way.[/QUOTE] Were are these torture camps?
[QUOTE=BusterBluth;19526490]Were are these torture camps?[/QUOTE] Guantanamo
Why do they even attempt to try and get off scott free? You have nae chance if there's so much evidence against you. >_>
[QUOTE=radioactive;19527704]Guantanamo[/QUOTE] hurf durf waterboarding and sleep deprivation are torture Except they aren't.
I feel sorry for any newsreader who has to pronounce that wankers name. I hope he fucking rots.
[QUOTE=Splode a Pinga;19530377]hurf durf waterboarding and sleep deprivation are torture Except they aren't.[/QUOTE] It's pretty obvious that the United States Government takes terrorists and the like to island prisons to beat the fuck out of them.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.