Economic sanctions surprisingly may have actually worked: Iran agrees to nuclear talks with the IAEA - Polidicks

[QUOTE](CNN) -- Nuclear talks will resume this week in Turkey between Iran and six world powers, the U.N. nuclear watchdog reported Monday. "We have agreed with Iran to launch a new round of talks in Istanbul on 14 April," said International Atomic Energy Agency spokesman Michael Mann in a statement. "We are very pleased that these talks, which will address the international community´s concerns on the Iranian nuclear programme, are going ahead after more than one year since we last met." [B]Agreement comes after weeks of diplomatic wrangling between Tehran and Russia, China, Germany, France, the United Kingdom and the United States. Faced with mounting pressure from the world powers over its controversial nuclear program, Iran said last month that it was ready to re-engage with the IAEA.[/B] As a signatory to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, Iran has the right, like other countries, to enrich uranium for commercial and research reactors. But the same facilities that are used for peaceful enrichment can be used to enrich uranium for a bomb. And that's what many Western countries suspect Iran is doing. Iran insists its nuclear program is exclusively for peaceful purposes. The country suggested over the weekend that it may be willing to reduce the amount of uranium it is enriching at 20%. [B]"Based on our needs and once the required fuel is obtained, we will decrease the production and we may even totally shift it to the 3.5%," Iranian nuclear chief Fereydoun Abbasi said in a televised interview, according to state-run Press TV.[/B] Iran does not plan to produce 20% enriched uranium for long, Abbasi said, according to Press TV. Uranium enriched at 20% is typically used for hospital isotopes and research reactors, but is also seen as a shortcut toward the 90% enrichment required to build nuclear weapons. Nuclear experts say Iran's supply is far greater than it would need for peaceful purposes. Iran says there is a medical purpose to its nuclear program. [B]The Gulf nation's economy has been hit hard by U.S. and European oil and financial sanctions over its nuclear activities.[/B] Israel has threatened to attack Iran's nuclear sites should peaceful alternatives be exhausted, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reiterating last month that Israel reserved the right to defend itself from the threat of a nuclear-armed Iran. [B]Netanyahu laid out demands Sunday in Jerusalem: "One, stop all enrichment of uranium, both 20% and 3%. Two, move all enriched material out of Iran's territory; it is possible to give them alternative material for peaceful purposes. Three, dismantle the illegal facility in Qom."[/B] The Fordo nuclear enrichment plant is in the mountains of Qom province, where Iran says it has 3,000 centrifuges in operation. "Naturally, we will monitor the talks to see that Iran does not use them in order to deceive the world and continue with its nuclear program," Netanyahu said. Tehran has threatened to cut off the Strait of Hormuz -- the only shipping lane out of the oil-rich Persian Gulf -- if it is attacked. [B]In early March, the head of the IAEA said there were indications that Iran was engaged in the development of nuclear weapons.[/B] "Iran is not telling us everything. That is my impression. We are asking Iran to engage with us proactively, and Iran has a case to answer," said Yukiya Amano, the director general of the IAEA.[/QUOTE] Source: [url]http://www.cnn.com/2012/04/09/world/meast/iran-nuclear-talks/index.html?hpt=hp_bn2[/url] They give into talks and promise to reduce enrichment and Israel still asks for complete destruction of their nuclear program.

Hurr Israel disapproving of nuclear development. It's not too long ago they tried to arm apartheid leaders in South Africa, I wonder why this is any different?

Quick! Stop them from doing cancer research! Starve their citizens to death for our own interests! Want a nuclear-free Middle East? Start with Israel. [QUOTE=WhatTheKlent;35497118]Hurr Israel disapproving of nuclear development. It's not too long ago they tried to arm apartheid leaders in South Africa, I wonder why this is any different?[/QUOTE] Israel, like South Africa, also has a system of apartheid.

And suddenly the people who were screaming for war, and that sanctions would not work, look like idiots.

Shit 3.5% is an extreme reduction. They do have a [URL="http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,670402,00.html"]valid reason for enriching to 20%[/URL] (19.81% to be exact) but as long as they (IAEA, U.S.) fill their end of the bargain as per the NPT (give Iran the pre-enriched uranium) this seems like a good deal.

Romney is going to be pissed.

[QUOTE=Chicken_Chaser;35498568]Romney is going to be pissed.[/QUOTE] Santorum is the one planning on bombing them to kingdom come once elected [editline]9th April 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=Ogopogo;35498063]And suddenly the people who were screaming for war, and that sanctions would not work, look like idiots.[/QUOTE] What about those who don't want war OR sanctions?

I read "IAEA" as "IKEA" at first.

[QUOTE=Emperor Scorpious II;35498950] What about those who don't want war OR sanctions?[/QUOTE] I don`t know, although myself I see little reason for such sanctions. Either way however, sanctions are a whole lot better than war.

Good to see that (sometimes) a (kinda) reasonable solution can be reached in international politics in between all the muscle stretching and useless competition and squabbles. Edit: Though the IAEA director's and Netanyahu's rhetoric is the usual "We're doing everything we can to reason with the bad guys".

Great news

israel really needs to fuck off

[QUOTE=Emperor Scorpious II;35498950]Santorum is the one planning on bombing them to kingdom come once elected[/QUOTE] I wasn't too crazy about Romney's "leading the free world" attitude, though.

[QUOTE=Strongbad;35498986]I read "IAEA" as "IKEA" at first.[/QUOTE] You stick the fuel rod into the nuclear reactor, you stick the nuclear reactor into the power grid