America is at DEFCON 3 for the first time since 9/11
14 replies, posted
[QUOTE]This is the DEFCON Warning System. Alert status for 2:45 P.M. Thursday, April 11th, 2013. Condition Yellow. DEFCON 3. Condition Yellow. DEFCON 3. Condition Yellow. DEFCON 3.
There are currently no imminent nuclear threats against the United States at this time, however the situation is considered fluid and can change rapidly.
The Pentagon reports that North Korea probably has nuclear weapons that can be mounted on ballistic missiles. This is a very significant admission by the United States and a dangerous change to the Korean situation. Currently, North Korea has moved its mid-range Musudan missile to east coast and has prepared it for launch. Additionally, North Korea has dedicated more facilities at its Yongbyon complex to nuclear weapons work. In response to rising tensions, China has mobilized its military and is massing near border with North Korea. South Korea has vowed a swift response to any attack by the North. While any response would be couched within political and diplomatic realities, this represents yet another step toward possible miscalculation in the Korean theatre.
Many believe that North Korea will launch their test missile on or about April 15. Japan has instructed its armed forces to shoot down any North Korean missile that heads toward its territory.
The United States has positioned two destroyers off the coast of Korea in response to the escalating situation. Additionally, the U.S. has expressed fears that North Korea has ability to launch a high-altitude nuclear device over the United States, resulting in the destruction of the electrical grid. Many analysts do not believe North Korea has the ability to do this yet, however it is only a matter of time.[/QUOTE]
[url=http://defconwarningsystem.com/]Source[/url]
Prepare your doom paul folders, friends.
It's Habbuning!
"situation is considered fluid".
Great.
Here we go.
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Q9TYUr-Teo
[/media]
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("Video marco" - Craptasket))[/highlight]
[quote]The DEFCON Warning System is a private enterprise which monitors world events and assesses nuclear threats against the United States by national entities. [B]It is not affiliated with any government agency[/B] and does not represent the alert status of any military branch.[/quote]
And as far as I know like only people inside the government and military know the actual defcon level.
FYI the shit hits the fan at DEFCON 2.
The last and only time it was at DEFCON 2 was during the cuban missile crysis.
this puts me at extreme unease even if it's not **official**
Not treating as real until some reliable media sources can verify.
When did they remove the disclaimer where it says they are NOT an official warning board?
Posting that website as a source should be bannable, it is not reputable and does represent the US military's actual state of readiness.
Now all of a sudden, after months and months of North Korea doesn't have that capability. In a single day almost, they do have that capability. Until other country's intelligence agencies say the same thing, I won't believe it. USA just looking for support to hit North Korea as far as I'm concerned. It'll take quite some time before I believe anything that US Intelligence/DoD says
Also, the Defcon warning system not being affiliated with any government agency is just referring to the website itself
[QUOTE=ScottyWired;40250033]When did they remove the disclaimer where it says they are NOT an official warning board?
Posting that website as a source should be bannable, it is not reputable and does represent the US military's actual state of readiness.[/QUOTE]
It's still there. It's just sorta buried deep in the page.
ban OP, bad source
if I was the owner of the website I'd be laughing my ass off for having tricked so many idiots
[QUOTE=legolover122;40250050]It's still there. It's just sorta buried deep in the page.[/QUOTE]
It is. False alarm, not happening.
is there a proper news source?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
