• Mother wins right to stay in UK to see the baby daughter she stabbed: Bangladeshi woman uses human r
    38 replies, posted
[quote]A mother who stabbed her baby daughter with a kitchen knife has won the right to stay in Britain – so she can stay in touch with the girl she tried to kill. The woman was jailed for five years for attempting to murder her daughter when the girl was just eight months old. After completing her jail sentence she was due to be deported to her home country of Bangladesh.But the family courts gave her the right to see her daughter under tight supervision for an hour three times a year – and she has now won the right to stay in Britain permanently.A judge ruled it would be ‘very cruel’ to stop her from seeing the child. She won her case using Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights – the right to a private and family life.[/quote] [URL="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2529695/Mother-wins-right-stay-UK-baby-girl-stabbed.html"]http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...l-stabbed.html[/URL] Source of the court ruling: [url]https://tribunalsdecisions.service.gov.uk/utiac/decisions/da-01171-2012[/url] [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Misleading thread title from a bad source" - Megafan))[/highlight]
I don't think you have a big enough thread title.
[quote]A judge ruled it would be ‘very cruel’ to stop her from seeing the child.[/quote] I'm pretty sure it's much more cruel to force a child to spend time with the person who [B][I]TRIED TO MURDER HER[/I][/B].
She only served five years for attempting to murder a baby? What the fuck.
Hope this Judge gets forced to resign, this is so fucked up
I know this is going to sound terrible, and I am surely glad the baby survived... But how exactly do you attempt to murder a baby by stabbing and then fail?
any source aside from the daily fail?
[QUOTE]Afterwards the woman asked her husband: ‘Why couldn’t you come in later? Then I could have finished her off?’, the court heard. [/QUOTE] Would be a shame for her to not be able to see her daughter again...
Good ol' DailyMail.
[QUOTE=woaka;43321713]Good ol' DailyMail.[/QUOTE] but this shit's true.
Daily Mail is a terrible source and in a case like this should have at least something else if it's going to claim things like this with such a disingenuous title. She was already in Britain beforehand, she was allowed to stay because her child was there, Article 8 is designed to ensure that a parent cannot be deported out of the country where their child (or other direct family) lives. Just remember that the section title here is not to be taken literally. If it's sensationalist, you probably shouldn't post it. [editline]27th December 2013[/editline] A user sent me a link to some information on the court ruling itself, which should qualify as a better source. With that the thread's re-opened. Just don't rely too much on the Daily Mail version.
[QUOTE=Megafan;43321932]Daily Mail is a terrible source and in a case like this should have at least something else if it's going to claim things like this with such a disingenuous title. She was already in Britain beforehand, she was allowed to stay because her child was there, Article 8 is designed to ensure that a parent cannot be deported out of the country where their child (or other direct family) lives. Just remember that the section title here is not to be taken literally. If it's sensationalist, you probably shouldn't post it. [editline]27th December 2013[/editline] A user sent me a link to some information on the court ruling itself, which should qualify as a better source. With that the thread's re-opened. Just don't rely too much on the Daily Mail version.[/QUOTE] What do you mean the section's name isn't literal. What is this section for, then? We already have a news section.
^ I can't tell if you're joking right now or if you're serious...
Welcome to the UK, where we bend over for every right and country alike.
[QUOTE=katbug;43322323]What do you mean the section's name isn't literal. What is this section for, then? We already have a news section.[/QUOTE] Uh, only bots can post threads there?
[QUOTE=Megafan;43321932]Daily Mail is a terrible source and in a case like this should have at least something else if it's going to claim things like this with such a disingenuous title. She was already in Britain beforehand, she was allowed to stay because her child was there, Article 8 is designed to ensure that a parent cannot be deported out of the country where their child (or other direct family) lives. Just remember that the section title here is not to be taken literally. If it's sensationalist, you probably shouldn't post it. [editline]27th December 2013[/editline] A user sent me a link to some information on the court ruling itself, which should qualify as a better source. With that the thread's re-opened. Just don't rely too much on the Daily Mail version.[/QUOTE] That's strange considering how most of the news articles I post are from the Daily Mail and no-one complains, including you.
I really don't understand how the title is misleading, it pretty much just said what happened.
Not right in the head. I feel pity more than anything else.
[QUOTE=CaptainObvious1;43322523]That's strange considering how most of the news articles I post are from the Daily Mail and no-one complains, including you.[/QUOTE] They don't like it when people post news about immigrants committing crimes.
how did the baby survive that?! A fully grown person can rarely survive getting stabbed with a kitchen knife, let alone a baby.
[QUOTE=deadoon;43322665]I really don't understand how the title is misleading, it pretty much just said what happened.[/QUOTE] That's why he's unbanned.
[QUOTE=Cabbage;43322731]how did the baby survive that?! A fully grown person can rarely survive getting stabbed with a kitchen knife, let alone a baby.[/QUOTE] Knife got caught on a rib, according to the article.
[QUOTE=CaptainObvious1;43322523]That's strange considering how most of the news articles I post are from the Daily Mail and no-one complains, including you.[/QUOTE] If they're not particularly important and there's not much point in investigating the story then it probably won't get checked out. The last thread you made with the Daily Mail was locked for being awful, and your most recent news thread in general didn't even list the source. So yes, I would say people do complain, even if you don't care.
[QUOTE=Megafan;43322879]If they're not particularly important and there's not much point in investigating the story then it probably won't get checked out. The last thread you made with the Daily Mail was locked for being awful, and your most recent news thread in general didn't even list the source. So yes, I would say people do complain, even if you don't care.[/QUOTE] The last thread I made with a Daily Mail source was involving a burglar who robbed a bookies which was also featured on numerous news channels and was locked because of an ongoing argument. My latest news thread was about a person who recieved an image of an Xbox One and if you actually bothered to google the story, you'd have found a link to the actual auction. Please don't talk out your arse. [editline]27th December 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=kurva;43322707]They don't like it when people post news about immigrants committing crimes.[/QUOTE] Aye, I have noticed...
Postpartum depression.
[QUOTE=CaptainObvious1;43323571]The last thread I made with a Daily Mail source was involving a burglar who robbed a bookies which was also featured on numerous news channels and was locked because of an ongoing argument. My latest news thread was about a person who recieved an image of an Xbox One and if you actually bothered to google the story, you'd have found a link to the actual auction. Please don't talk out your arse.[/QUOTE] One, if that first story was featured on numerous other reputable news channels, why did you post the link from the Daily Mail? Two, if you'd actually read the rules sticky for this section you'd be aware that posting a source in your thread OP is a requirement, so that people don't [I]need[/I] to go google your story and verify it.
He's saying that you're talking shit about Daily Mail and locked this thread because of it, but not [I]his[/I] threads that used Daily Mail as a source..I think.. v:v:v
[QUOTE=Megafan;43333109]One, if that first story was featured on numerous other reputable news channels, why did you post the link from the Daily Mail? Two, if you'd actually read the rules sticky for this section you'd be aware that posting a source in your thread OP is a requirement, so that people don't [I]need[/I] to go google your story and verify it.[/QUOTE] The Daily Mail website does feature some stories that are verified and true so don't ban users on the premise that you don't think its a good source as that's just being an arsehole. It takes two seconds to google a news article. That's just plain laziness if you cannot be bothered to do that. [editline]29th December 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=Quark:;43333527]He's saying that you're talking shit about Daily Mail and locked this thread because of it, but not [I]his[/I] threads that used Daily Mail as a source..I think.. v:v:v[/QUOTE] Nope, its not fair to ban someone because you think the source is bad.
[QUOTE=CaptainObvious1;43339347]The Daily Mail website does feature some stories that are verified and true so don't ban users on the premise that you don't think its a good source as that's just being an arsehole. It takes two seconds to google a news article. That's just plain laziness if you cannot be bothered to do that. [editline]29th December 2013[/editline] Nope, its not fair to ban someone because you think the source is bad.[/QUOTE] The Daily Mail is a totally shit source. Most tabloids are totally shit sources. Sure the story may very well be true, as in it happened, but the way they will word it and spin it make them a shit source. Not the stories necessarily, just the sheer sensationalism they use in their writing. Banning people for shit sources is totally fine. Misinformation is dangerous.
Good thing he fucking linked court documents with it.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.