Pewdiepie going content cop on their asses. Fuckin nice.
If I told my past self that I would become a fan of Pewdiepie, I'd be all like...naw.
Dudes killin it.
"HypoFritz"
fucking amazing
My god, that Curb Your Enthusiasm bit was hilarious.
JK Rowling looks kind of hot in these nazi clothes
"Wearing Himmler style glasses"
Watch out everyone, turns out one of the American founding fathers was a nazi 130 years before it was popular.
[t]http://s2.hubimg.com/u/1230645_f520.jpg[/t]
I'm not sure if he is allowed to with youtube specifically, but I would have liked him to show an example that he was never contacted, and that they also went to youtube specifically to get his entire channel demonetized. I don't doubt him, but thats probably the weakest point in the video and the only thing anyone could try and tear him down with.
PewdiePie is doing a good job at making the WSJ look fucking stupid off the back of this
[QUOTE=TheTalon;51869727]PewdiePie is doing a good job at making the WSJ look fucking stupid off the back of this[/QUOTE]
Sadly it's not all worth it since he lost so much because of them. I hope the WSJ burns to the ground from this affair.
Jesus Christ, can a video get any more satisfying?
This problem of shitty journalism is so entrenched that it seems daunting to even do anything about it short of shaming them like Pewdiepie is doing. I would say it would be better if WSJ just closed their doors, but I don't really believe that - it wouldn't help.
Why did the media attack Felix's source of income first? That seems more spiteful than anything, I understand reporting on the sensationalist part of the story for more attention, but getting his sponsors off him before even contacting him first about the issue? "Journalism"
[QUOTE=werrek;51869817]Why did the media attack Felix's source of income first? That seems more spiteful than anything, I understand reporting on the sensationalist part of the story for more attention, but getting his sponsors off him before even contacting him first about the issue? "Journalism"[/QUOTE]
Because its the classic old media VS the new media
remember when radio killed the music industry?
[editline]24th February 2017[/editline]
And when TV killed the movie star?
I was hoping Felix was actually going to email WSJ's sponsors, comment ettiquette style.
[QUOTE=Tetsmega;51869870]I was hoping Felix was actually going to email WSJ's sponsors, comment ettiquette style.[/QUOTE]
im glad he didnt. That would have given fuel to the sources to make it look like pewdiepie is just as bad as them.
Same reason he shouldnt sue them. These kind of videos are doing far more damage to their credibility that a legal dispute. He doesnt need money so i see no reason to go through that hell.
That was amazing. These last few videos out from Pewds have been pretty great.
[QUOTE=autodesknoob;51869885]im glad he didnt. That would have given fuel to the sources to make it look like pewdiepie is just as bad as them.
Same reason he shouldnt sue them. These kind of videos are doing far more damage to their credibility that a legal dispute. He doesnt need money so i see no reason to go through that hell.[/QUOTE]
No, I think the WSJ losing a libel lawsuit would be way more damaging. The question is whether it's worth Pewdiepie's time and effort.
I wish he would just fucking sue them, but that's a huge waste of money and time
If he did buy the company though, that would just be a huge waste of money
You know what to do Felix
What a savage ending lmaoo
[QUOTE=Helix Snake;51869917]No, I think the WSJ losing a libel lawsuit would be way more damaging. The question is whether it's worth Pewdiepie's time and effort.[/QUOTE]
Unfortunately, I doubt PDP would be able to make a libel case against the WSJ. The way libel works is the US is they have to be saying things that are verifiably false. They're being misleading as fuck and putting a spin on it but nothing they have said in their reporting is strictly false.
[QUOTE=Splash Attack;51870011]Unfortunately, I doubt PDP would be able to make a libel case against the WSJ. The way libel works is the US is they have to be saying things that are verifiably false. They're being misleading as fuck and putting a spin on it but nothing they have said in their reporting is strictly false.[/QUOTE]
the pretenses of getting him dropped/fired by sponsors [and attempting to drop his revenue from youtube] in an attempt to completely fuck over his career on the assumption that he's an antisemitic nazi icon while bypassing several milestones of journalistic integrity is kind of up there on the scale of 'half truths through omission' vs 'character assassination based on implied falsehoods'
Good god, this video just felt so viciously savage I almost want to email WSJ and give them a list of burn wards.
Just look abit at this;
[url]http://www.vox.com/culture/2017/2/17/14613234/pewdiepie-nazi-satire-alt-right[/url]
And then this;
[url]http://www.polygon.com/2017/2/17/14637642/pewdiepie-south-park-anti-semitic-jokes[/url]
Want to know something funny?
Vox owns Polygon.
They most likely put a separate and unrelated to video games article on their video game branch publishing side to make it look like other news sources agree with them.
Cant he sue them for this though? Its clearly defamation isnt it?
[QUOTE=Tudd;51870165]Just look abit at this;
[url]http://www.vox.com/culture/2017/2/17/14613234/pewdiepie-nazi-satire-alt-right[/url]
And then this;
[url]http://www.polygon.com/2017/2/17/14637642/pewdiepie-south-park-anti-semitic-jokes[/url]
Want to know something funny?
Vox owns Polygon.
They most likely put a separate and unrelated to video games article on their video game branch publishing side to make it look like other news sources agree with them.[/QUOTE]
Incredible flexibility to duck your own dick
As if I needed another reminder that [URL="https://twitter.com/RubberNinja/status/833941317495332864"]angry Tumblr people[/URL] existed, they sure love attacking Felix and anyone who's on his side.
"Maybe I should buy the Wall Street Journal... Mmm, no, seems like a failing business to me."
Fucking S A V A G E
I mean we now get that WSJ are dick heads, but then so is J.K Rowling for blindly following their bullshit.
The cunt.
[QUOTE=Cock Boner;51871054]"Maybe I should buy the Wall Street Journal... Mmm, no, seems like a failing business to me."
Fucking S A V A G E[/QUOTE]
I'm half expecting him to start being seen wearing a loin cloth and holding a bone club.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
