Return of the Cold War as Royal Navy confronts Russian aircraft carrier group in the English Channel
47 replies, posted
[IMG]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/05/08/article-2623480-1DACD0D800000578-629_964x532.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE]A Russian aircraft carrier and and a nuclear-powered battle cruiser have passed through the English Channel - escorted by a British warship.
The seven-strong naval task group led by the Admiral Kuznetsov, Russia's largest warship, entered the Channel last night, a Royal Navy spokesman said.
Although the ships did not enter UK territorial waters, their movements were tracked by the Royal Navy destroyer HMS Dragon - the duty fleet-ready escort vessel - which was dispatched from Portsmouth.
The military manoeuvre came on the same day as president Vladimir Putin oversaw nuclear test launches in Russia.
Three inter-continental ballistic missiles were launched at test sites in the remote east of Russia, in what the military said was a test run for massive nuclear retaliation should Russia or its allies be attacked.
The ships, which are currently being escorted by the Navy, are believed to have been returning to the Baltic after manoeuvres in the Mediterranean. They are headed for a naval base in Severomorsk in the north-west of Russia.
It is not unusual for Russian warships to pass through the Channel - the same group went through in the opposite direction in December.
At no point have the ships entered the UK's territorial waters - which extend 12 nautical miles from the coast of the country. However, according to a UN treaty on sea passage, there is no reason military vessels should not be allowed through so long as they do not threaten the peace or security of a country.
The Voice of Russia website - which often carries details of Russian naval movements - reported last month that they were due to return.
However the latest passage took place against the backdrop of heightened tensions between the West and Russia over Ukraine.
A Royal Navy spokesman said: 'We can confirm that HMS Dragon was activated as the fleet-ready escort vessel. She met the task group centred around the Admiral Kuznetsov.'
[/QUOTE]
[url]http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2623480/The-Cold-War-really-IS-Russian-aircraft-carrier-group-Soviet-era-ships-escorted-English-Channel-state-art-Royal-Navy-destroyer.html[/url]
[url]http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/05/08/us-britain-russia-carrier-idUSBREA470FJ20140508[/url]
Kirov-class battlecruisers are fucking awesome.
[img]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/05/08/article-2623480-1DACD23F00000578-601_964x493.jpg[/img]
This is just routine if anything.
You could have just left it with Reuters as the only source. No one should use Dailymail as one.
Dailymail title for their article:
[quote]The bear in our backyard: Return of the Cold War as Royal Navy confronts Russian aircraft carrier group in the English Channel for the first time in years[/quote]
Reuters:
[quote]UK says deploys a destroyer to track Russian aircraft carrier[/quote]
That really says a lot about using that shitty source.
Damn I didn't know the Admiral Kuznetsov was still operable.
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZ4L6-40-os[/media]
Good ol' Russian hardware.
Russian aircraft carriers look so dodgy compared to US ones lol
[quote]Although the ships did not enter UK territorial waters[/quote]
So basically a non issue as they were in international waters.
[QUOTE=Orkel;44804256]Kirov-class battlecruisers are fucking awesome.
[img]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/05/08/article-2623480-1DACD23F00000578-601_964x493.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
Ahh good ol floating city warships.
They don't make them like those anymore, its all polygons now.
[QUOTE=adam1172;44805265]Ahh good ol floating city warships.
They don't make them like those anymore, its all polygons now.[/QUOTE]
They look cool sure, but in a modern battle the bigger your ship is the more likely you'll get your shit blown up instantly.
[QUOTE=RainbowStalin;44805347]They look cool sure, but in a modern battle the bigger your ship is the more likely you'll get your shit blown up instantly.[/QUOTE]
Just look ar china, now they have bombs that can rip a fucking super carrier wide open.
That RN destroyer looks like its wearing a wizard's hat.
'Return of the cold war' more like 'return of the permafrost war' tbh. You couldn't get a 'colder' incident if you tried.
hi russia, yeah sexualshark here just wanted to tell you that u must first have a dick to dickwave.
It kinda looks like an Iowa class destroyer without the guns
Let's say the Russian ships and that ship decided War Time, and started attacking one another... Could the UK ship actually do anything being that close to the ships and being a guided missile cruiser?
[QUOTE=TheTalon;44805526]It kinda looks like an Iowa class destroyer without the guns
Let's say the Russian ships and that ship decided War Time, and started attacking one another... Could the UK ship actually do anything being that close to the ships and being a guided missile cruiser?[/QUOTE]
At that range it'd just be a gunfight unless the carrier had any aircraft up.
[QUOTE=TheTalon;44805526]It kinda looks like an Iowa class destroyer without the guns
Let's say the Russian ships and that ship decided War Time, and started attacking one another... Could the UK ship actually do anything being that close to the ships and being a guided missile cruiser?[/QUOTE]
They could launch it on a vertical arc and hit it straight on top.
[QUOTE=Amez;44804269]This is just routine if anything.
You could have just left it with Reuters as the only source. No one should use Dailymail as one.
Dailymail title for their article:
Reuters:
That really says a lot about using that shitty source.[/QUOTE]
The Daily Mail is as bad as RT.
HMS Dragon sure looks weird. All though I can't say it looks at strange as the ship from some Arab country that was in Portsmouth some months ago
For the uninitiated, Kirov Class Battle-cruisers are designed to engage entire NATO fleets alone, and Pyotr Velikiy never goes alone. The Royal Navy can send all the ships it wants to meet the Velikiy and her carrier escort, in actual combat it wouldn't do them any good and Russia knows it and isn't afraid go where it pleases.
[QUOTE]Captain Rex Cox, commanding officer of HMS Dragon[/QUOTE]
By the way, best porno name ever for a CO goes to the CO of the HMS Dragon.
[QUOTE=Ta16;44805713]For the uninitiated, Kirov Class Battle-cruisers are designed to engage entire NATO fleets alone, and Pyotr Velikiy never goes alone. The Royal Navy can send all the ships it wants to meet the Velikiy and her carrier escort, in actual combat it wouldn't do them any good and Russia knows it and isn't afraid go where it pleases.
By the way, best porno name ever for a CO goes to the CO of the HMS Dragon.[/QUOTE]
Let's be honest here, in the Royal Navy, their anti-surface capability isn't in the surface vessels, but rather their submarines. Sending HMS Dragon to escort the group is just a visible method of shadowing, as in all likelihood there's a SSN trailing them anyway.
[QUOTE=Araknid;44804737][B]Russian aircraft carriers[/B] look so dodgy compared to US ones lol[/QUOTE]
The Russian Navy has a total of one aircraft carrier.
[QUOTE=Useful Dave;44805912]Let's be honest here, in the Royal Navy, their anti-surface capability isn't in the surface vessels, but rather their submarines. Sending HMS Dragon to escort the group is just a visible method of shadowing, as in all likelihood there's a SSN trailing them anyway.[/QUOTE]
Well, the Russian fleet would have to sail right past HMNB Devonport in Plymouth, which is where all our active submarines are based, soooo....
[QUOTE=Orkel;44804256]Kirov-class battlecruisers are fucking awesome.
[img]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/05/08/article-2623480-1DACD23F00000578-601_964x493.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
In my opinion, there has not been a cool-looking ship ever since cannons went out of fashion.
I mean, there is absolutely no beating the sheer intimidation of a steel-coated behemoth with dozens of cannons a man's fist wide.
[t]http://www.ww2incolor.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=5829&d=1327553527[/t]
[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/30/Yamato_during_Trial_Service.jpg[/t]
Nelson wept! You'd think we'd learned our lesson with the first Channel Dash.
[QUOTE=Araknid;44804737]Russian aircraft carriers look so dodgy compared to US ones lol[/QUOTE]
[video=youtube;4ShACteRduY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ShACteRduY[/video]
[QUOTE=ionuttzu;44806203][video=youtube;4ShACteRduY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ShACteRduY[/video][/QUOTE]
Haha, I immediately recognized that dude as beaglerush.
[QUOTE=codemaster85;44805451]Just look ar china, now they have bombs that can rip a fucking super carrier wide open.[/QUOTE]
Not that impressive since carriers have minimum armor on them.
[QUOTE=laserguided;44804237]
The military manoeuvre came on the same day as president Vladimir Putin oversaw nuclear test launches in Russia.
Three inter-continental ballistic missiles were launched at test sites in the remote east of Russia, in what the military said was a test run for massive nuclear retaliation should Russia or its allies be attacked.[/QUOTE]
Did anyone notice this bit?
[QUOTE=maxumym;44806108]In my opinion, there has not been a cool-looking ship ever since cannons went out of fashion.
I mean, there is absolutely no beating the sheer intimidation of a steel-coated behemoth with dozens of cannons a man's fist wide.
[t]http://www.ww2incolor.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=5829&d=1327553527[/t]
[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/30/Yamato_during_Trial_Service.jpg[/t][/QUOTE]
Nothing gets the spine tingling like a fuckoff-huge monolith of steel floating in the water, looming over the puny little humans crawling over its superstructure as if they were so many ants.
[img]http://www.hmshood.org.uk/photos/mackie/jscott3.jpg[/img]
[t]http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_d-aDIbgs-dc/S_pAJl2r5LI/AAAAAAAAAKg/iXcvvm91n1Q/s1600/1924_HMS_Hood_rdax_1024x677.jpg[/t]
[QUOTE=Reshy;44806707]Did anyone notice this bit?[/QUOTE]
Probably just Putin trying to give a reminder that MAD is a thing when literally everyone is like "we know" and he's like "no guys seriously listen to me we have nukes" and everyone's like "yeah we know, come on bro no need to get your knob out" "no seriously i have a schlong like a SCUD" "okay TMI" and the analogy kind of falls apart there, but you get what I meant.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.