Star Wars fan writes a whopping 108 page response to Mr. Plinkett's TPM review
79 replies, posted
Holy shit I thought he was joking in his "Episode 3 Review is now up..." trailer for the review but some sad sack back in January actually did what was just stated in the title.
[url]http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=146990[/url]
I didn't read much of it, but if you hate yourself even more than I hate myself here's something for you groan at for a couple hours.
Jesus fucking christ, remember this is a movie guys
Okay after looking it some of it more carefully, he does make a couple decent points and arguments.
Too bad that it's fucking boring. I'd rather listen to Mr. Plinkett if he's a lot more entertaining to listen to even if he has some faulty points. See, Red Letter Media wants to be entertaining as well as criticizing. There are even some fans of the prequel trilogy who enjoy his reviews because he's funny. The only point of this is to show off his big meaty fanboy cock.
108 pages? Holy fuck, that guy really has nothing to do with his life.
How could you even think of enough content to fill 108 pages.
Also I think he may be autistic because he doesn't get obvious jokes sometimes. There's a part near the end of the review in which Plinkett says that George Lucas probably got rid of those who challenged him, and the guy who wrote the thing simply responds that Plinkett has no proof of that.
It seems hard to grasp the concept that there are Star Wars fanboys who would defend the prequels so strongly, the two always seemed mutually exclusive to me.
[QUOTE=pie_is_good;29563565]Also I think he may be autistic because he doesn't get obvious jokes sometimes. There's a [b]part near the end of the review[/b] in which Plinkett says that George Lucas probably got rid of those who challenged him, and the guy who wrote the thing simply responds that Plinkett has no proof of that.[/QUOTE]
You.. you read the whole thing..?
[QUOTE=OutOfExile2;29563592]It seems hard to grasp the concept that there are Star Wars fanboys who would defend the prequels so strongly, the two always seemed mutually exclusive to me.[/QUOTE]
fanboys are never rational
[editline]1st May 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=Downsider;29563624]You.. you read the whole thing..?[/QUOTE]
it's actually a pretty easy read
[QUOTE=Downsider;29563624]You.. you read the whole thing..?[/QUOTE]
I think he means the end of the video review
[QUOTE=Downsider;29563624]You.. you read the whole thing..?[/QUOTE]
No I just skipped through.
Holy shit the living definition of a sperg
Are you kidding me? I thought I over argue about shit.
I'd love to see a reply that just says something like "U Mad" after he wrote those 108 pages.
[QUOTE=Chickens!;29564502]I'd love to see a reply that just says something like "U Mad" after he wrote those 108 pages.[/QUOTE]
he mad
[QUOTE=hamberglar;29565055]he mad[/QUOTE]
and the Masters of the Universe!
this guy reminds me of the woman a while back who wrote an whole legal document with crazy demands because her son "might" have been hit by a white teacher.
[quote=first reply in thread]and can say that it's a thousand times more bearable than RLM's review based just on the fact that it isn't being read aloud in a slow, droning monotone.[/quote]
uhhhh
Wow, the people on those forums are humorless twats.
Its like he wrote a thesis on Star Wars.
His review was more entertaining that TPM was imo
[QUOTE=markfu;29568906]Its like he wrote a thesis on Star Wars.[/QUOTE]
So, got a degree? "Yeah, on Star Wars"
"..."
"Welcome!"
"I'll also admit to not liking Stoklasa's style. I find his Mr. Plinkett character extremely annoying, with a dull voice that sounds horrible even if it's intentional. He also mispronounces words on purpose, making things even more of a chore to listen to. I don't understand how anyone can bash Jar Jar Binks on one hand but like Mr. Plinkett on the other."
This is where I stopped reading. I think he may actually be autistic, he has no sense of humour, not to mention he fails to grasp the intentional irony. I just know the entire thing is going to be full of this shit.
[QUOTE=Rusty100;29572012]"I'll also admit to not liking Stoklasa's style. I find his Mr. Plinkett character extremely annoying, with a dull voice that sounds horrible even if it's intentional. He also mispronounces words on purpose, making things even more of a chore to listen to. I don't understand how anyone can bash Jar Jar Binks on one hand but like Mr. Plinkett on the other."
[/QUOTE]
oh my fucking god
[QUOTE=pie_is_good;29563565]Also I think he may be autistic because he doesn't get obvious jokes sometimes. There's a part near the end of the review in which Plinkett says that George Lucas probably got rid of those who challenged him, and the guy who wrote the thing simply responds that Plinkett has no proof of that.[/QUOTE]
I was about to post that he was most probably Autistic, now I can remove the "most probably".
I skim read up until page 12, at which point I realized his methodology was going to be attempting to refute every single sentence in a 70 minute review of a bullshit film, something that frankly I cannot be bothered reading.
what makes it funnier is the fact that he enjoyed the prequels
I feel sorry for the aspie, he obviously cares about the prequels a lot more than anybody working on them did
I could understand a 108 pages on Stargate, but Star Wars? Fuck no.
[QUOTE=nikomo;29574689]I could understand a 108 pages on Stargate, but Star Wars? Fuck no.[/QUOTE]
Not the prequels, at least.
This makes me want to cry.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.