• France recognizes anti-Assad coalition as legit government; Britons struggle to make original surren
    12 replies, posted
[quote] France has become the first Western power to recognise Syria's opposition coalition as the sole legitimate representative of the Syrian people. The move was announced by President Francois Hollande at a televised news conference in Paris. Syrian opposition groups struck a deal in the Qatari capital Doha on Sunday to form a broad coalition to overthrow President Bashar al-Assad. The US and Britain have both signalled support for the coalition. But they stopped short of recognising it as a government-in-exile. On Monday, Gulf Arab states declared the coalition to be the sole legitimate representative of the Syrian people. Opposition and human rights activists estimate that more than 36,000 people have been killed since the uprising against President Assad's rule began in March 2011. More than 408,000 Syrians have fled to neighbouring countries, and more are fleeing every day, according to the United Nations. Mr Hollande told reporters: "I announce today that France recognises the Syrian National Coalition as the sole legitimate representative of the Syrian people and as the future government of a democratic Syria, allowing it to bring an end to Bashar al-Assad's regime." The BBC's Arab Affairs Editor Sebastian Usher says Mr Hollande's announcement is a clear sign that the West is now pinning its hopes on the Syrian opposition finally being able to offer a united and effective alternative to President Assad. The National Coalition for Syrian Revolutionary and Opposition Forces has been calling on European nations to recognise it as the country's transitional government, enabling it to buy weapons to assist its attempts to overthrow President Bashar al-Assad. Mr Hollande said France would look at the question of arming the coalition, but that it would not support doing so "as long as it wasn't clear where these weapons went". "With the coalition, as soon as it is a legitimate government of Syria, this question will be looked at by France, but also by all countries that recognise this government," he said. In Washington, state department deputy spokesman Mark Toner said the US regarded the National Coalition as "a legitimate representative" of the Syrian people. "We now have a structure in place that can prepare for a political transition," he told reporters. "But... we're looking for it to still establish the types of technical committees that will allow us to make sure our assistance gets to the right places." Earlier, UK Foreign Secretary William Hague described the coalition's formation as a milestone, but said it still had to prove itself. "We want to see that they have support inside Syria," he said. "That is a very crucial consideration. "If they do all these things, yes, we will be able to recognise them as the legitimate representative of the Syrian people." His comments came after the head of the coalition, Mouaz Alkhatib, called for diplomatic support as Arab and European ministers met in Cairo. "I request European states to grant political recognition to the coalition as the legitimate representative of the Syrian people and to give it financial support," he said in an interview with Reuters news agency. "When we get political recognition, this will allow the coalition to act as a government and hence acquire weapons and this will solve our problems."[/quote] [url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-20319787]source[/url] Interesting how France has taken the initiative here. Correct me if I'm wrong but weren't they also the first Western government to actually recognize Libya's National Transition Council?
I bet the French are trying to get their influence over there back.
I'm going to have to detest this action, it's going to turn back on them when the Syrians turn back the war.
France sure does know how to balance relations.
[QUOTE=laserguided;38438618]France sure does know how to balance relations.[/QUOTE] I trust France to deal with the Region more than most other nations. They kind of owned it for several hundreds of years throughout history.
[QUOTE=Nikota;38438983]I trust France to deal with the Region more than most other nations. They kind of owned it for several hundreds of years throughout history.[/QUOTE] And they were brutally imperialistic to the inhabitants, similar to their current ambitions.
[QUOTE=TechnoFrau;38439007]And they were brutally imperialistic to the inhabitants, similar to their current ambitions.[/QUOTE] You're thinking of how they handled Africa. They were really quite swell to the inhabitants of the general middle eastern area. They were generally tolerant towards the religious groups in the area. [editline]13th November 2012[/editline] And sorry, but what? How is France, in any way, imperialistic at the moment?
[QUOTE=Nikota;38439053]You're thinking of how they handled Africa. They were really quite swell to the inhabitants of the general middle eastern area. They were generally tolerant towards the religious groups in the area. [editline]13th November 2012[/editline] And sorry, but what? How is France, in any way, imperialistic at the moment?[/QUOTE] You trust a nation that not so many years ago was having a big issue with Muslim immigrants to handle a nation of [I]nothing but[/I] Muslims?
[QUOTE=Nikota;38439053]You're thinking of how they handled Africa. They were really quite swell to the inhabitants of the general middle eastern area. They were generally tolerant towards the religious groups in the area. [editline]13th November 2012[/editline] And sorry, but what? How is France, in any way, imperialistic at the moment?[/QUOTE] You mean showing complete disregard for international sovereignty, attempting to support regime change for their own interests and subjecting the inhabitants of Syria to pain and misery.
It's not as if they're administrating it. I actually support their actions towards the rush of immigrants in their country. The way I see it, in a nation with freedom and constitution, you have to follow the rules and co-exist, the nation doesn't bend to your will.
The rebels themselves are assholes too. Just as much as Assad. They are killing alawite (or however you spell it) people indiscriminately, just because they are from the same sect as Assad. A group that's trying to achieve peace and establish a democratic government wouldn't carry out suicide bombing attacks, go door to door and kill anybody that they suspect is a assad supporter, etc which is what the rebels have been doing.
[QUOTE=aydin690;38439399]The rebels themselves are assholes too. Just as much as Assad. They are killing alawite (or however you spell it) people indiscriminately, just because they are from the same sect as Assad. A group that's trying to achieve peace and establish a democratic government wouldn't carry out suicide bombing attacks, go door to door and kill anybody that they suspect is a assad supporter, etc which is what the rebels have been doing.[/QUOTE] The USA did that bro. Minus the suicide bombing.
[QUOTE=Nikota;38439595]The USA did that bro. Minus the suicide bombing.[/QUOTE] Doesn't make it in any way better
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.