[url]http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8553034.stm[/url]
[quote]US President Barack Obama has pledged to cut the number and role of nuclear weapons in America's national security strategy.[/quote]
FFFFFUUUUUU
No, no, no Obama! What the fuck are you doing?
We already have enough to destroy the entire world several times over. I think being able to destroy the entire world only once is enough.
To many nuclear weapons for my own liking. Like bean-o said, we could destroy earth and everything on it several times. Which is scary really.
[QUOTE=MR-X;20581141]To many nuclear weapons for my own liking. Like bean-o said, we could destroy earth and everything on it several times. Which is scary really.[/QUOTE]
[b]EXACTLY[/B]
We have the whole fucking planet by the balls! We're grabbing so tight, they can't fucking ejaculate, if we reduce our numbers of nuclear weapons, the whole world is going to splurge all over us!
You don't need several thousand, or hundred, or dozen even for that matter.
[QUOTE=BANNED USER;20581261]You don't need several thousand, or hundred, or dozen even for that matter.[/QUOTE]
You're right.
We need a lot more than that.
[QUOTE=lolwutdude;20581275]You're right.
We need a lot more than that.[/QUOTE]
Nuclear fallout. The explosions aren't the only thing that cause damage; the fallout would have much farther-reaching effects. Even if the initial blasts only targeted population centers, one would expect the death of massive numbers of wildlife and trees.
[QUOTE=Boba_Fett;20581197]
[URL]http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/how-many-nukes-will-it-really-take-to-instantly-annihilate-humanity/[/URL][/QUOTE]
Wait whoa what
France has more nukes than the U.K?
I don't know, that just feels wrong somehow.
[QUOTE=DireAvenger;20581351]Wait whoa what
France has more nukes than the U.K?
I don't know, that just feels wrong somehow.[/QUOTE]
Don't worry about it, they'd just feel inferior without them.
[QUOTE=DireAvenger;20581351]Wait whoa what
France has more nukes than the U.K?
I don't know, that just feels wrong somehow.[/QUOTE]
Your avatar fits in this thread
Good, i'd rather not have the world destroyed.
[QUOTE=lolwutdude;20581164][B]EXACTLY[/B]
We have the whole fucking planet by the balls! We're grabbing so tight, they can't fucking ejaculate, if we reduce our numbers of nuclear weapons, the whole world is going to splurge all over us![/QUOTE]
You are an offical moron, congratulations.
[QUOTE=DireAvenger;20581351]Wait whoa what
France has more nukes than the U.K?
I don't know, that just feels wrong somehow.[/QUOTE]
Only in very recent history, the past 150 years or so, has France not been a leading world power. It's kind of interesting to think that back in the late 1700's, everyone pissed their pants to think of France declaring war on them.
[QUOTE=DireAvenger;20581351]Wait whoa what
France has more nukes than the U.K?
I don't know, that just feels wrong somehow.[/QUOTE]
The French are a massive bunch of H-bomb humpers. The vast, vast majority of their energy comes from nuclear.
[QUOTE=lolwutdude;20581164][b]EXACTLY[/B]
We have the whole fucking planet by the balls! We're grabbing so tight, they can't fucking ejaculate, if we reduce our numbers of nuclear weapons, the whole world is going to splurge all over us![/QUOTE]
Are you trying to be funny with the sexual innuendo.
[QUOTE=Boba_Fett;20581197][IMG]http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/nuclear3.jpg[/IMG]
[URL]http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/how-many-nukes-will-it-really-take-to-instantly-annihilate-humanity/[/URL][/QUOTE]
that includes water. Like what, 70% of the earth is water?
The world's nuclear powers, namely the U.S. and Russia, have massive amounts of nukes as it is. Reducing their numbers would be a good thing. Nowadays it seems that having more warheads than another country establishes the same superiority of having a bigger dick. To me it's a dick size contest, for dicks that never get used.
Isn't an Obama thing, when were you born
[IMG]http://i174.photobucket.com/albums/w81/Hurland/9c878805.png[/IMG]
[QUOTE=lolwutdude;20581275]You're right.
We need a lot more than that.[/QUOTE]
didn't you tell VNL that you'd stop trolling
[QUOTE=Elexar;20581693]that includes water. Like what, 70% of the earth is water?[/QUOTE]
Actually, that's the 12.5% of land that's populated.
148,940,000 km² * 0.125 = 18,617,500 km²
(Numbers from [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth]Wikipedia[/url] and the percentage from that post.)
So yeah, that's accurate.
[editline]5:36[/editline]
In fact, to hit the entire surface area of the planet, we'd need:
510,072,000 km² / 14.9 km² = 34,233,020.134228187919463087248322
Over 34 million nukes.
[editline]5:37[/editline]
That's a lot.
[QUOTE=madmanmad;20581511]Good, i'd rather not have the world destroyed.
You are an offical moron, congratulations.[/QUOTE]
i dont take your kind seriously sir
We need to construct more nuclear weapons, that way, neither UK, Russia, Germany, Australia, or anyone else can doubt the military superiority of the USA.
besides, if we can destroy the whole world, that's more incentives for other country to fear us.
[editline]01:40AM[/editline]
[QUOTE=laval;20581792]
didn't you tell VNL that you'd stop trolling[/QUOTE]
do you know the definition of trolling?
too many people throw around the word trolling way too much.
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("Stop trolling." - Greeman))[/highlight]
[QUOTE=lolwutdude;20581876]i dont take your kind seriously sir
We need to construct more nuclear weapons, that way, neither UK, Russia, Germany, Australia, or anyone else can doubt the military superiority of the USA.
besides, if we can destroy the whole world, that's more incentives for other country to fear us.
[/QUOTE]
Yes, you should fear other countries into fearing you, and if they don't you can just ravage the entire world with nuclear warheads. That makes perfect sense.
[QUOTE=Elexar;20581693]that includes water. Like what, 70% of the earth is water?[/QUOTE]
Okay then. We'd still need over 300,000 of those nukes.
We just can't believe that anyone could be this moronic.
He's fucking obviously trolling people, now leave him alone.
I wish people would stop mis-titling things
Current title: "Obama to reduce numbers of nuclear weapons"
REAL title: "Obama SAYS he will reduce numbers of nuclear weapons."
[QUOTE=smurfy;20582139]He's fucking obviously trolling people, now leave him alone.[/QUOTE]
i'm just being sarcastic, but if people feels like they're getting trolled by this, they should feel free to be believe im a troll.
Nuclear weapons are a thing of the past. We only need them as a dick waving device. We will [I]never, I say, NEVER[/I] use them again unless we are put in the most dire of circumstances, none of which seem likely in the near future. We really don't need as much as we have, Getting rid of a few won't hurt. Getting rid of all of them at once wouldn't be a wise decision though.
[QUOTE=OvB;20582332]Nuclear weapons are a thing of the past. We only need them as a dick waving device. We will [I]never, I say, NEVER[/I] use them again unless we are put in the most dire of circumstances, none of which seem likely in the near future.[/QUOTE]
Never say never.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.