[QUOTE=RichyZ;51539390]It's getting old, Tudd[/QUOTE]
I still think it is worth posting.
I mean it's not like the majority of people like the similar GQ Keith Olbermann videos, and tell the OP to stop it.
Because I think most people understand there can be a civil debate instead of outright denial of content.
[QUOTE=Tudd;51539399]I still think it is worth posting.
I mean it's not like the majority of people like the similar GQ Keith Olbermann videos, and tell the OP to stop it.
Because I think most people understand there can be a civil debate instead of outright denial of content.[/QUOTE]
Is there anyone on FP who agrees with
[QUOTE]Everyone I Don't Like is a White Supremacist [/QUOTE]
Everyone I Don't Like is a SJW.
[QUOTE=Raidyr;51539437]Is there anyone on FP who agrees with[/QUOTE]
It's a clickbaity title like most things on youtube.
It fits with the content he discusses though either way.
Both Sargon and Akkad deserve their own political megathread.
There I said it
[QUOTE=rrunyan;51539473]Both Sargon and Akkad deserve their own political megathread.
There I said it[/QUOTE]
I actually would be for that.
For the Akkad only megathread ofcourse. Not the Sargon.
[QUOTE=Raidyr;51539437]Is there anyone on FP who agrees with[/QUOTE]
not quite, sargon's typical hyperbolic bullshit side i see a few people now and then who like to label people as alt right which is just the new buzzword for white supremacist.
i couldnt get through the whole video but sargon touched a pretty significant issue (it would have been better if it didn't just address it from one angle) where media acts retarded on purpose to make dumb people think they're informed, thereby dumbing down an entire country's political discourse to "right wingers are evil/racist"
i really don't think we need another trump vs clinton argument on FP. it is interesting to consider what happens when you have everybody on tv news being stupid with a confident tone talking at the masses.
[QUOTE=Mattk50;51539706]not quite, sargon's typical hyperbolic bullshit side i see a few people now and then who like to label people as alt right which is just the new buzzword for white supremacist.
i couldnt get through the whole video but sargon touched a pretty significant issue (it would have been better if it didn't just address it from one angle) where media acts retarded on purpose to make dumb people think they're informed, thereby dumbing down an entire country's political discourse to "right wingers are evil/racist"
i really don't think we need another trump vs clinton argument on FP. it is interesting to consider what happens when you have everybody on tv news being stupid with a confident tone talking at the masses.[/QUOTE]
Focusing on something other than SJWs is kind of a tall order for Sargon.
[QUOTE=Tudd;51539399]I still think it is worth posting.
I mean it's not like the majority of people like the similar GQ Keith Olbermann videos, and tell the OP to stop it.
Because I think most people understand there can be a civil debate instead of outright denial of content.[/QUOTE]
Only problem with the debate part is with how long sargon videos are, it makes it a whole lotta effort to go through compared to responding to a facepunch post or even just a keith olbermann video. It's pretty quick to break down one of those videos into the key points and evidence. Also doesn't help that this is just a reply video
[QUOTE=Trebgarta;51539835]Are we posting Sargon of Akkad again?
Here is what Youtube recommended me for a few days now.
[video=youtube;7dQVRLrCbZs]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dQVRLrCbZs[/video]
I guess it is a good video since it is trending so much. The title and thumbnail might be clickbait, so you never know what it really is about, dont form opinions before watching it.
[sp]/s[/sp][/QUOTE]
Ironically, if you actually watched it, it's a really detailed history of past pedophile rings and doesn't support pizzagate.
[editline]16th December 2016[/editline]
[QUOTE=thelurker1234;51540013]Only problem with the debate part is with how long sargon videos are, it makes it a whole lotta effort to go through compared to responding to a facepunch post or even just a keith olbermann video. It's pretty quick to break down one of those videos into the key points and evidence. Also doesn't help that this is just a reply video[/QUOTE]
No I agree the length is overbearing for a lot of people.
But I think it brings up good points nonetheless about media narratives and racial problems in America.
[QUOTE=Trebgarta;51539835]
I guess it is a good video since it is trending so much. The title and thumbnail might be clickbait, so you never know what it really is about,[B] dont form opinions before watching it.
[/B]
[B]/s[/B][/QUOTE]
Honestly this is a stupid statement regardless of the video.
What did Sargon do before the whole SJW thing? I never bothered to check.
[QUOTE=MissingNoGuy;51540183]What did Sargon do before the whole SJW thing? I never bothered to check.[/QUOTE]
Nothing in terms of youtube
not sure about his past career
[QUOTE=MissingNoGuy;51540183]What did Sargon do before the whole SJW thing? I never bothered to check.[/QUOTE]
He didn't exist until the dumb pointless internet war against so called "sjws" in video games started and he saw that he could probably profit off of gullible nerds in an extremely polarized political climate
[QUOTE=cdr248;51540228]Nothing in terms of youtube
not sure about his past career[/QUOTE]
He was making a video game funded by crowdsourcing
cancelled it tho rip
[QUOTE=Tudd;51540149]
No I agree the length is overbearing for a lot of people.
But I think it brings up good points nonetheless about media narratives and racial problems in America.[/QUOTE]Also just the content, since it's a reply video it's harder to cut it up into a thesis and points.
After hearing him weakly debate Steven Bonell where he showed a poor understanding of a lot of the topics they discussed, but presented himself as knowledgeable, I don't want to hear about him discussing racial problems again. He thought a lot of poverty problems could be solved just by marriage, and went in a circle barely elaborating past that.
[QUOTE=KillRay;51540745]After hearing him weakly debate Steven Bonell where he showed a poor understanding of a lot of the topics they discussed, but presented himself as knowledgeable, I don't want to hear about him discussing racial problems again. He thought a lot of poverty problems could be solved just by marriage, and went in a circle barely elaborating past that.[/QUOTE]
Oh yeah, that was hilarious.
Sargon is utterly convinced that if you just get married to literally anybody you'll suddenly become more wealthy, and that the only way to solve poverty to get poor people to marry each other.
I always thought it was the other way around
there's plenty of uneducated folks that can't get high paying jobs but still get married and have kids that they can't support
not saying that poor people shouldn't be allowed to have kids or anything, but if you're already poor then having a kid is just gonna make you more poor
[QUOTE=rrunyan;51539473]Both Sargon and Akkad deserve their own political megathread.
There I said it[/QUOTE]
God yes please.
I'm so fucking sick of constant Hillary/Trump/Political threads in the videos section.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
