• California law barring parents from 'curing' gay children moves through legislature
    83 replies, posted
[quote] A first-of-its-kind state law that would restrict parents from trying to "cure" their minor children's same-sex attractions seems headed to the governor's desk. If both state houses can agree on the final language, the legislation, which would ban all sexual orientation change effort (SOCE) treatment for minors, will be sent to Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown for his signature sometime in September. But, so far, there has been no indication from his office on whether he will sign the bill into law. Whatever the governor does, he's sure to face criticism. Backers see it as a civil rights issue, while critics say lawmakers are infringing on not only parents' rights but also on the mission of mental health professionals. "[The law] unconstitutionally prohibits speech…violates privacy and personal autonomy rights, intermeddles in theological disputes, clashes with other laws and creates significant unintended consequences," Matt McReynolds,, a staff attorney with Sacramento-based Pacific Justice Institute, said. "As long as this bill threatens to shame patients and silence counselors, therapists, psychologists and psychiatrists, we will vigorously oppose it," McReynolds told Fox News. "We cannot afford to let the state invade the counseling room or doctor's office to dictate what views on sexuality are acceptable and unacceptable." Sponsored by a coalition of gay rights groups led by California Equality the bill was introduced by State Sen. Ted W. Lieu (D-Redondo Beach). Lieu told Fox News his interest in the issue was sparked by a news report he saw on television in 2011. "The story detailed the harmful impact on vulnerable minors of this kind of supposed reparative therapy," Lieu said. "So when California Equality approached me about introducing a bill to ban that kind of therapy for minors, I jumped at the chance." Lieu also cited studies like the American Psychological Association (APA) 2009 Task Force, which reported SOCE therapy could lead to depression, feelings of shame, self-loathing, drug abuse, high-risk sexual behavior, anger, withdrawal and in some cases, even attempted suicide in minor children, if those same-sex attractions continue to persist. Libertarian and conservative political and legal groups including McReynolds' group and the National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH), a nationwide group of conservative mental health providers based in Salt Lake City have blasted the bill. David Pickup, a Glendale, Calif. therapist said he's been a member of NARTH for more than eight years. He told Fox News that he went through his own SOCE treatment and uses it to treat his patients. Pickup said that although he's had thousands of sexual interactions with men, he never identified himself as being gay. "I describe myself as being a heterosexual man with a homosexual challenge," Pickup said, adding that after his own SOCE treatment he had feelings for women and now only experienced attractions towards men "once in a blue moon." Pickup claims that SOCE treatments work to varying degrees on "95 percent" of his patients and he vehemently opposes SB 1172 as a "violation of parental rights," and said the law would have a "chilling effect" on the ability of therapists to treat their patients. Pickup also claims mainstream mental health groups like the APA 2009 Task Force report labeling SOCE change efforts as "posing critical health risks" to lesbian, gay and bisexual people was based solely on "anecdotal evidence." Brad Dacus, president of PJI told Fox News that whether or not the therapy is viable isn't for lawmakers to decide. Parents, patients and therapists should not be dictated to, he said. "This is really a serious violation of the constitutional rights of patients and counselors, a violation of privacy and an outright attack on the rights of parents to decide what is best for their children," Dacus said. Lieu responded to the criticism by pointing out this was a health issue and his bill was written to protect the health, welfare and rights of minors who were experiencing same-sex attractions. "We (the government) intervene all the time to restrict the rights of individuals and parents regarding health issues," Lieu told Fox News. "We pass laws saying minors can't buy tobacco products; anyone under 21 can't legally drink alcohol and we force parents to put their very young children into car seats while they're driving," Lieu said. While public opposition to the bill has been loud and long, it was actually opposition to portions of the legislation from mainstream mental health associations that forced Lieu and the bill's sponsors to amend it. That opposition, which included several smaller mental health groups, was led by a coalition of the state's four largest mental health associations: the California Association of Marriage and Family Therapists (CAMFT), California Psychiatric Association, California Psychological Association and the California Association for Licensed Professional Clinical Counselors (CALPCC). Today, the bill only bans SOCE treatments for minors, regardless of their parents' desires. Initially, the bill's sponsors had wanted a total ban on SOCE in the state. Also cut was a provision that subjected mental health providers to damage claims and civil suits by their former patients and immediate family members if they violated the law. But one major sticking point remained. Randall Hagar, Government Affairs director of the California Psychiatric Association told Fox News the coalition remained opposed because the bill's definition of SOCE was "overly broad and could have inhibited minors from discussing even legitimate issues, fears and concerns about their sexual identity with their therapists." Dr. Jo Linder-Crow, executive director of the California Psychological Association echoed Hagar's concerns. "It would have been too easy to misinterpret," she said. "Our concern was that proverbial law of unintended consequences and what could happen to our patients." A compromise was finally brokered that enabled the coalition to move to a neutral position on the bill, Hagar said. In laymen's terms, Hagar said, SOCE was defined as any therapy whose sole purpose or aim was to change a person's sexual orientation from same-sex to opposite sex attraction. Banned SOCE treatments would exclude psychotherapies that provide acceptance, support, and understanding of clients or the facilitation of clients' coping, social support and identity exploration and development, including sexual orientation-neutral interventions to prevent or address unlawful conduct or unsafe sexual practices and do not seek to change sexual orientation. [/quote] [url]http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/08/18/california-law-barring-parents-from-curing-gay-children-moves-through/?intcmp=trending[/url]
Finally, parents need to realize that these kind of things can't be changed and these 'treatment' camps are usually very detrimental to the child's mental state.
[QUOTE=Bryanrocks0;37312431]"I describe myself as being a heterosexual man with a homosexual challenge"[/QUOTE] no youre a homo deal with it
but they need to be saved by the power of jesus christ or theyll burn in hell god bless america
[QUOTE=bull3tmagn3t;37312525]but they need to be saved by the power of jesus christ or theyll burn in hell god bless america[/QUOTE] Do we really need this in every thread? All it is is senseless ratings whoring, even if the intentions behind it are true.
[quote]"I describe myself as being a heterosexual man with a homosexual challenge,"[/quote] I would describe you as potentially beautiful human being capable of amazing intimate relationship with an ideological challenge.
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;37312552]I would describe you as potentially beautiful human being capable of amazing intimate relationship with an ideological challenge.[/QUOTE] That's pretty gay bro
[quote]"[The law] unconstitutionally prohibits speech…violates privacy and personal autonomy rights, intermeddles in theological disputes, clashes with other laws and creates significant unintended consequences," Matt McReynolds,, a staff attorney with Sacramento-based Pacific Justice Institute, said. [/quote] You can't restrict my right to ruin my children. Freedom of speech, bitch.
[QUOTE=smurfy;37312564]That's pretty gay bro[/QUOTE] Thankfully you are a respecting, open minded, reasonable person, so this is nothing more but lighthearted poke, right?
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;37312595]Thankfully you are a respecting, open minded, reasonable person, so this is nothing more but lighthearted poke, right?[/QUOTE] You're the one who's all about poking, man.
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;37312595]Thankfully you are a respecting, open minded, reasonable person, so this is nothing more but lighthearted poke, right?[/QUOTE] He meant it as in a "haha emotions" kind of thing, which I also thought it was pretty "gay" if you can call it that :v: So yeah, a joke.
what next??? the kids of today marrying toasters??? back in my day we didnt need camps to remove the gays disease from a child, we used our belts
I should be less of a whore, sorry
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;37312844]I know and that's all fine, I am sorta kidding myself What was more awkward were three weeks at scout camp, where I obviously don't flaunt my stances and relationships. Haha gay jokes yes, gay people are funny very funny he he he. (while trying to hide my boner every time I see that one cute blonde guy)[/QUOTE] Okay, we get it, you're gay.
[QUOTE=Crimptor;37312899]Okay, we get it, you're gay.[/QUOTE]How did you not know already?
We are all homo sapiens we deserve to be homo.
[QUOTE=Jackald;37312970]I still can't believe this is even still an issue. How bigoted do you have to be to still think that homosexuality is a "choice" that can be "cured", or that it's a "disease." Like how is this even still a thing in the leading country of the western world.[/QUOTE] Inbred hillbillies who have kids that move into suburban neighborhoods.
All privately-owned behavioral-rehabilitation facilities target towards children should be outlawed. It's not just these, camps and organizations that are supposed to help with disobedience and the like have a long track record of heinous crimes and violence from staff.
A month later: A study has shown that 50% of parents with gay children have moved out of California.
Good! I hear nothing but horrible stories about these "treatment" camps. Why are there treatment camps if there is nothing to fix?
[QUOTE=Naaz;37312953]How did you not know already?[/QUOTE] I'm assuming he already knew, like everyone else; knowing that he posts about it in every single LGBT thread.
This is good, those camps are nothing short of fucked up.
I believe there is a growing phenomenon of sexually confused teenagers turning gay through the help of Internet and imageboards. And I'm not sure what to think of it. You can see it happening on Facepunch as well. I think it's not good.
[QUOTE=Gekkosan;37314155]I believe there is a growing phenomenon of sexually confused teenagers turning gay through the help of Internet and imageboards.[/QUOTE] And you know this to be true, how exactly?
[QUOTE=Gekkosan;37314155]I believe there is a growing phenomenon of sexually confused teenagers turning gay through the help of Internet and imageboards. And I'm not sure what to think of it. You can see it happening on Facepunch as well. I think it's not good.[/QUOTE] by and large people don't "turn" gay I'd wager the internet is just showing young kids who are already gay, that they're not alone and they're not bad people for liking people of the same gender, so they feel more confident in coming out.
Fucking homophobes - Is gay ^:v:^
should be in every state
[QUOTE=Gekkosan;37314155]I believe there is a growing phenomenon of sexually confused teenagers turning gay through the help of Internet and imageboards. And I'm not sure what to think of it. You can see it happening on Facepunch as well. I think it's not good.[/QUOTE] You heard it here first folks. Gay is a memetic disease!
[QUOTE=Boxbot219;37315070]You heard it here first folks. Gay is a memetic disease![/QUOTE] My god, someone get an SCP containment crew in here
[quote] critics say lawmakers are infringing on not only parents' rights[/quote] So do all the other laws against child abuse and no one's complaining about those. I'm glad to hear this is going through, but frankly it's disgusting that this hasn't been banned nationwide already.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.