Fox News strategic analyst: Obama should have acted before he had all the facts. US should deploy tr - Polidicks

Unfortunately not a joke title [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JT_CpkPqJWE[/media] Sorry for the shit quality, blame Mediamatters

I'm past the point where complete arsewipes like him anger me, now it just makes me depressed.

Ralph Peters is a hot head. His answer to everything is to kill it.

It's Fox News. Is this a surprise?

Holy shit.

Yeah, try doing that and see what happens. You go into another country and kill 400 people, I guarantee that it won't stop there.

This will certainly be the solution to all problems in the middle east, after all 400 are dead, flowers will spread, peace and love are declared.

"An angry mob kills 4 people, kill 400 random civilians in return! [I]That'll[/I] get them to stop hating us!" Fucking dumbass. Also: "Those illiterate Arabs" Sure.

It's almost like something you see out of a parody movie, making fun of todays media. Except this IS actually media. The fuck!?

Wait he says [QUOTE]The video was a useful tool for the Salafist, the al-Qaeda types, to get the illiterate out on the streets of the city as cover. The filmmaker provided them fuel. It played the role as a tool, its not the ultimate cause.[/QUOTE] Which I agree with. Then he says [QUOTE]When our people are killed, you kill them [Libyans] in large numbers[/QUOTE] Which is stupid. So he's not a total idiot. More like a half-idiot.

Killing 400 Libyans is a great idea, look they hate the West and their opinions on other countries aren't at all aligned with ours [img]http://sas-origin.onstreammedia.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/jl8gcm3qc0m48nis9pi8ca.gif[/img] [img]http://sas-origin.onstreammedia.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/wlmxlxmppeoiwvkdtnxtvq.gif[/img]

So........ how long before GunFox comes in and agrees?

This is not news, this is gutrage. And it's worrysome.

"acted before he had all the facts" so don't think just act like a dick?

[QUOTE=SPESSMEHREN;37665948]So........ how long before GunFox comes in and agrees?[/QUOTE] hes too busy signing up

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1g82I7w3ENU[/media] [editline]14th September 2012[/editline] Wow the landscape even looks like Libya

This is some Game of Thrones Geoffry bullshit

So...he basically want us to be the big-bad guy that strikes first without questions just to prove they shouldn't attack us? Well done, well done. And why don't you say you want another World War while your at it?

[QUOTE=Neo222;37666971]So...he basically want us to be the big-bad guy that strikes first without questions just to prove they shouldn't attack us? Well done, well done. And why don't you say you want another World War while your at it?[/QUOTE] He seems like the sort that would actually say that. I bet he jerks it to the thought of his country being locked in war.

Holy fucking SHIT! He's a fucking psychopath. Holy Jesus childraping christ.

Didn't really see anything i disagreed with when Obama spoke Then again Fox News...

Wont that just make 400 martyrs for others to rally around?

Ralph Peters...? Seriously? I liked this guy's two books: [I]Red Army[/I] and [I]The War in 2020[/I], the first one because most NATO vs. Warsaw Pact books took place from the Western point of view, never the Soviets. Also, this is his view of how to solve all (or most) problems in the Middle East. Take it as you will, I don't know enough about Middle Eastern politics to know if this would be a viable solution. [IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/7c/Ralph_Peters_solution_to_Mideast.jpg[/IMG] Just found out Ralph Peters also called for the assassination of Julian Assange after the WikiLeaks of the US diplomatic cables. Goddamnit Peters, stop making me hate your books just because you wrote them

Fox news is like the opposite equivalant of North koreas propaganda maschine. from a non american viewer

[QUOTE=LiquidNazgul;37667161]Ralph Peters...? Seriously? I liked this guy's two books: [I]Red Army[/I] and [I]The War in 2020[/I], the first one because most NATO vs. Warsaw Pact books took place from the Western point of view, never the Soviets. Also, this is his view of how to solve all (or most) problems in the Middle East. Take it as you will, I don't know enough about Middle Eastern politics to know if this would be a viable solution. [IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/7c/Ralph_Peters_solution_to_Mideast.jpg[/IMG] Just found out Ralph Peters also called for the assassination of Julian Assange after the WikiLeaks of the US diplomatic cables. Goddamnit Peters, stop making me hate your books just because you wrote them[/QUOTE] The idea of a Kurdish state would sit alright with me, but the rest of the map is just...what

Titles a bit sensationalist, it implies that he was referring to simple civilians which isn't necessarily the case.

that stare he gives after he says it is deep as hell almost as if he knows what he's saying and he totally regrets it

[QUOTE=LiquidNazgul;37667161]Also, this is his view of how to solve all (or most) problems in the Middle East. Take it as you will, I don't know enough about Middle Eastern politics to know if this would be a viable solution. [IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/7c/Ralph_Peters_solution_to_Mideast.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE] kurdistan blob west bank still not fixed more theocracies israel existing and the borders are fucking ugly to boot, 0/10

[QUOTE=Strider*;37667271]Titles a bit sensationalist, it implies that he was referring to simple civilians which isn't necessarily the case.[/QUOTE] This push back harder logic is disturbing though. It's not long ago that Bush formed the basis of his Iraq invasion on falsified evidence.

[QUOTE=Strider*;37667271]Titles a bit sensationalist, it implies that he was referring to simple civilians which isn't necessarily the case.[/QUOTE] Not really, it's ambiguous. And even there, who cares? It's an entirely insane thing to propose.