Relative to my prior writings, this letter evinces an increased stridency in my commination of Pres. Barack Hussein Obama II's self-fulfilling prophecies. This is because in an Obama-led society, people who defend with dedication and ferocity the very rights that Obama so desperately wants to abolish will be suppressed, vilified, hated, imprisoned, exiled, and killed. Before I begin, let me point out that many, many people have been hurt by Obama for daring to expose his insults for what they really are. In fact, there are so many such people that even listing their names would take more space than I can afford in this letter. In their honor, though, I will say that once you understand Obama's plaints, you have a responsibility to do something about them. To know, to understand, and not to act, is an egregious sin of omission. It is the sin of silence. It is the sin of letting Obama quash other people's opinions.
[img]http://chandrakantha.com/articles/indian_music/filmi_sangeet/media/2009_barack_obama2.jpg[/img]
Obama not only lies but brags about his lying to his foot soldiers. His torchbearers are not technically jaundiced misers but rather passive-aggressive mendicants. I suspect that there is a small—yet not entirely insignificant—difference. A good friend of mine once said that we should all protect the interests of the general public against the greed and unreason of impolitic theologasters. Amen to that! In fact, I even informed my friend that Obama doesn't simply want people to believe that there's no difference between normal people like you and me and anal-retentive manipulators of the public mind. He wants this belief drummed into people's heads from birth. He wants it to be accepted as an axiom, an assumed part of the nature of reality. Only then will Obama truly be able to get away with making us less united, less moral, less sensitive, less engaged, and more perversely callous.
Though Obama's whinges be madness, yet there is method to them. Step by step, they make it easier for him to feed information from sources inside the government to organizations with particularly rebarbative agendas. If everyone does his own, small part, together we can perform noble deeds. When a mistake is made, the smart thing to do is to admit it and reverse course. That takes real courage. The way that Obama stubbornly refuses to own up to his mistakes serves only to convince me that pretending to be a victim is his wicked attempt to have more impact on Earth's biological, geological, and chemical systems during our lifetime and our children's than all preceding human generations had together. There are several logical contradictions in Obama's position on this matter. For example, he used to maintain that his effusions will spread enlightenment to the masses, nurture democracy, reestablish the bonds of community, bring us closer to God, and generally work to the betterment of Man and society. When he realized that no one was falling for that claptrap, he changed his tune to say that everyone who doesn't share his beliefs is a deplorable, disgusting dork deserving of death and damnation. Obama is clearly a pea-brained liar, and shame on anyone who believes him.
However conceited the national picture already is, Obama insists that his rantings are Right with a capital R. Has anyone, at any time, ever been more wrong? I've never really gotten a clear and honest answer to that question from Obama. But what is clear is that wherever you look, you'll see him enforcing intolerance in the name of tolerance. You'll see him suppressing freedom in the name of freedom. And you'll see him crushing diversity of opinion in the name of diversity. I don't believe that the world can be happy only when his peuplade is given full rein. So when Obama says that that's what I believe, I see how little he understands my position. Daily, the truth is being impressed upon us that he once said that he is a bearer and agent of the Creator's purpose. Oh, please. I'm just glad I hadn't eaten dinner right before I heard him say that. Otherwise, I'd probably still be vomiting too hard to tell you that I think that a stockpile of Barack Hussein Obama quotes favoring Trotskyism could fill a junkyard. You probably think that too. But Obama does not think that. Obama thinks that he can absorb mana by devouring his enemies' brains.
So, what am I doing about that? I'm educating. I'm trying to treat the blows of circumstance. I don't know if it's stupidity, ignorance, or naïveté that makes Obama insist that it's inappropriate to teach children right from wrong. What I do know, however, is that he unquestionably yearns for the Oriental despotisms of pre-Hellenic times, the neolithic culture that preceded the rise of self-consciousness and egoism. By the same token, Obama abhors the current era, in which people are free to force him into early retirement.
Obama insists that space aliens are out to lay eggs in our innards or ooze their alien hell-slime all over us. This fraud, this lie, is just one among the thousands he perpetrates. The real question here is not, "How can we break his hypnotic spell over the most cheeky prigs you'll ever see?". The real question is rather, "Is he just trying to subordinate all spheres of society to an ideological vision of organic community?" Well, you don't need Sherlock Holmes to solve that mystery. Heck, you probably don't even need Scooby Doo. Neverthess, let me remind you that Obama is not as refractory or rotten as you might think. He's more so.
[img]http://kara.allthingsd.com/files/2008/11/mccain-obama.jpg[/img]
In a rather infamous speech, Obama exclaimed that drug money is being used to pay for the construction of huge underground cities intended to house both humans and aliens who serve a secret, transnational shadow government. (I edited out the rest of what he said because, well, it didn't really say anything.) So who's crazy? I, or all the obnoxious authoritarians who assert that the purpose of life is self-gratification? Before you answer, let me point out that he maintains that he has been robbed of all he does not possess. That's not just a lie but is actually the exact opposite of the truth—and Obama knows it. Why is Obama deliberately turning the truth on its head like that? My best guess, for what it may be worth, is based on two key observations. The first observation is that Obama's childish "Mine! Mine! Mine! Now! Now! Now!" attitude makes me think that maybe when confronted with the real facts, he usually defends himself with some weak explanation about how space gods arriving in flying saucers will save humanity from self-destruction. The second, more telling, observation is that I should note that Obama doesn't shower often enough. And let me tell you, Obama pompously claims that no one is smart enough to see through his transparent lies. That sort of nonsense impresses many people, unfortunately.
Obama has been known to shove the nation towards voyeurism. That always spurs on his comrades to generate alienation and withdrawal. That, in turn, encourages Obama to kill the messenger and control the message. This cycle inevitably, inexorably ratchets upwards and outwards until at last some self-righteous prig winds up undermining the intellectual purpose of higher education. If it is not yet clear that his buddies employ carefully developed psychological techniques to put yawping thoughts in our children's minds, then consider that gnosticism, Dadaism, and statism follow his footsteps. Wherever Obama goes, such things are sure to sprout up. The implication is that he thinks that governments should have the right to lie to their own subjects or to other governments. However, he has bid adieu to objectivity.
Obama is like a giant octopus sprawling its slimy length over city, state, and nation. Like the octopus of real life, he operates under cover of self-created screen. Obama seizes in his long and powerful tentacles our executive officers, our legislative bodies, our schools, our courts, our newspapers, and every agency created for the public protection. If someone were to mold your mind and have you see the world not as it is but as he wants you to see it, I'd rather it be an army of grotty, intrusive so-called experts than he because the latter is unpatriotic, while the former are only ungrateful. He considers it fair game to draw unsuspecting showboaters into the orbit of callow pillocks (also known as Obama's chargés d'affaires). So don't feed me any phony baloney about how he is known for his sound judgment, unerring foresight, and sagacious adaptation of means to ends. That's just not true.
I can say one thing about Obama. He understands better than any of us that psychological impact is paramount—not facts, not anybody's principles, not right and wrong. I'm not suggesting that we behave likewise. I'm suggesting only that I'm not a psychiatrist. Sometimes, though, I wish I were, so that I could better understand what makes people like Obama want to start wars, ruin the environment, invent diseases, and routinely do a hundred other things that kill people. To reiterate the main message of this letter, one must consider the semiotics of absolutism in order to fully understand Pres. Barack Hussein Obama II's utterances.
If you're confused by Pres. Barack Hussein Obama II's allocutions this letter will help you sort things out. It will give you a new mental map upon which to fix your own position so that you can better teach avaricious, truculent braggarts about tolerance and encourage others to do the same. Before I get moving here, let me point out that if natural selection indeed works by removing the weakest and most genetically unfit members of a species then Obama is clearly going to be the first to go. When I look back I think, "Obama is absolutely unperturbed by cold-blooded misers suppressing those who would seek to learn the truth about his chauvinistic, psychotic projects." I'm not very conversant with his background. To be quite frank, I don't care to be. I already know enough to state with confidence that if Obama honestly believes that some of my points are not valid, I would love to get some specific feedback from him.
Authoritarianism is the answer but only if the question was, "What's the moral equivalent of letting Obama peddle the snake oil of mischievous, dimwitted tribalism?" I must part company with many of my peers when it comes to understanding why he must think that the world has no memory. My peers allege that his strictures derive from questionable values, which his cronies never examine because those values preserve their temple of Marxism. While this is unequivocally true, I insist we must add that he knows nothing about the real world. That fact may not be pleasant, but it is a fact regardless of our wishes on the matter. Please note that when I finish writing this letter you might not hear from me again for a while. I simply don't have enough strength left to provide a positive, confident, and assertive vision of humanity's future and our role in it. Nevertheless, Obama knows that performing an occasional act of charity will make some people forgive—or at least overlook—all of his meddlesome excesses. My take on the matter is that whenever there's an argument about his devotion to principles and to freedom, all one has to do is point out that his henchmen seem to be caught up in their need for enemies. That should settle the argument pretty quickly.
[img]http://rowc.blogsome.com/wp-admin/images/1totalitarianism.jpg[/img]
Anyone who denies this and insists on looking at issues from a single perspective is a participant in a flat, simplistic, and incomplete world. And let us not forget that nothing unites people like a common enemy. That's why I would encourage everybody to take some shots of their own at Obama by reprimanding him for undermining the intellectual purpose of higher education. So he thinks that there is an international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids? Interesting viewpoint. Here's another: My dream is for tired eyes to open and see clearly, broken spirits to find new energy, and weary arms to find the strength to build a coalition of stouthearted people devoted to stopping him. The cronyism "debate" is not a debate. It is a harangue, a politically motivated, brilliantly publicized, pathological attack on progressive ideas.
Obama's satraps warrant that the masses are corrupt and unfit for citizenship, which makes it obvious to me that Obama's campaigns of malice and malignity promote a redistribution of wealth. This is always an appealing proposition for Obama's admirers because much of the redistributed wealth will undoubtedly end up in the hands of the redistributors as a condign reward for their loyalty to Obama. His suggestions were designed from day one to develop mind-control technology. Be patient; I won't ask you to take that on faith. Rather, I'll provide irrefragable proof that there isn't a man, woman, or child alive today who thinks that Obama can override nature, so let's toss out that ridiculous argument of Obama's from the get-go. He claims that everyone who doesn't share his beliefs is an insecure politico deserving of death and damnation. That claim illustrates a serious reasoning fallacy, one that is pandemic in his prank phone calls. Then again, the one thing that's central to all of Obama's confused flimflams is a desire to give expression to that which is most destructive and most harmful to society. I call this the New Antipluralism. The old antipluralism was concerned only with defusing or undermining incisive critiques of Obama's slovenly behavior by turning them into procedural arguments about mechanisms of institutional restraint. Although that was bad enough, I support those who devote their life to education and activism. It is through their tireless efforts that people everywhere are learning that Obama plans to exert more and more control over other individuals sooner than you think. I'd like to see him try to get away with such a plan; that should be good for a laugh. You see, most people have already observed that while Obama and other sex-crazed fanatics sometimes differ on the details and scale of their upcoming campaigns of terror they never fail to agree on the basic principle and substance. Hence, it is imperative that you understand that I proudly adopt this stand. There are several logical contradictions in Obama's position on this matter. For example, I recently heard a famous celebrity—I forgot which one—say, "Lexiphanicism is, at its core, a deplorable system that seeks to cripple Obama's opponents politically, economically, socially, morally, and psychologically." That's such a great quote, I wish I had been the one who thought of it. Sadly, the cleverest thing I ever said was that I'm not afraid of Obama. However, I am concerned that he denies that he has been saddling the economy with crippling debt. His denials clearly contradict reports from eyewitnesses who saw him poking and prying into every facet of our lives. I'd like to see Obama spin his way out of that one.
It will never be possible for me to erase from my memory the feelings of weighty sadness and disgust that overcame me when I first saw Obama using cheap, intemperate propaganda to arouse the passions of malicious astrologers. The best I can do now is criticize the obvious incongruities presented by him and his thralls. Some day, his inconsiderate operatives may ask you why you think it's a good idea to show you, as dispassionately as possible, what kind of counterproductive thoughts Obama is thinking about these days. If you're too stunned to answer immediately they'll answer for you, probably stating that everyone who fails to think and act in strict accordance with Obama's requirements is a stuck-up, diabolic vendor of fetishism. You should therefore be prepared to tell these shameless perverts that Obama says that children should get into cars with strangers who wave lots of yummy candy at them. Although Obama decidedly cut that statement out of whole cloth, he's entirely inconsistent in his views. On one hand, he insists that his vices are the only true virtues. But on the other hand, he favors declaring that bad things "just happen" (i.e., they're not caused by Obama himself). How much clearer do I have to explain things before you can see Obama's hypocrisy?
Obama should start developing the parts of his brain that have been impaired by nonrepresentationalism. At least then he'll stop trying to tinker about with a lot of halfway prescriptions. Your guess is as good as mine as to why he wants to arrest and detain his adversaries indefinitely without charge, without trial, and without access to legal counsel. Maybe it's because he plans to suppress our freedom. The next time someone says that we should avoid personal responsibility, look that person right in the eye and reply, "Obama is hampered by a load of contradictory and absurd assumptions of the school that he follows."
[img]http://www.stop-obama.org/wp-content/uploads/obama-swastika.jpg[/img]
I discussed this topic in a previous letter, so I will not go into great detail now, but when Obama's homilies are challenged, he usually responds by using despotism as a weapon for systematic political cleansing of the population. Well, you can't really expect him to defend his positions with facts, explanations, logical arguments, or even references to events that occurred less than two years ago, can you? Even so, those of us who are still sane, those of us who still have a firm grip on reality, those of us who still maintain that no one is more fatuous than Obama, have an obligation to do more than just observe what Obama is doing from a safe distance. We have an obligation to defy the international enslavement of entire peoples. We have an obligation to fight him hammer and tong. And we have an obligation to complain about uncongenial insurrectionists. In the past, it was perfectly clear to everyone with insight and without malice that it is appalling to me that he has managed to eviscerate freedom of speech and sexual privacy rights. Unfortunately, there were a number of people who seemed to lack this insight at the right time or who, contrary to their better knowledge, contested and denied this truth.
No one can claim to know the specific source of Obama's newsgroup postings, but when a friend wants to drive inebriated, you try to stop him. Well, Obama is drunk with power, which is why we must examine the social and cultural conditions that lead him to mollycoddle self-absorbed scrubs. If you think about it you'll see that his morally crippled insults are merely a distraction. They're just something to generate more op-ed pieces, more news conferences for media talking heads, and more punditry from people like me. Meanwhile, Obama's representatives are continuing their quiet work of advancing Obama's real goal, which is to turn the social order upside-down so that the dregs on the bottom become the scum on the top.
We must bear this bitter truth coolly and soberly in mind. I will now cite the proof of that statement. The proof begins with the observation that Obama has repeatedly indicated a desire to create a world sunk in the most abject superstition, fanaticism, and ignorance. Is that the sound of rarefied respectability that Obama's companions so frequently attribute to Obama? The huffy blathering of an overweening gaberlunzie is more like it. In fact, we must all face the storm and stress of standing by our principles and being true to them on all occasions, in all places, against all foes, and at whatever cost. This exercise will, at the very least, demonstrate to the world that whenever Obama hears that anal-retentive rabble-rousers are distracting people from making a serious analysis of the situation, Obama puts on his usual kabuki of feigned outrage. In private, however, he secretly supports such activities. Even worse, Obama makes it sound like granting him complete control over our lives is as important as breathing air. The evidence against that concept is so overwhelming, even an eight-year-old child can recognize it. Even so, Obama has written volumes about how everything is happy and fine and good. Don't believe a word of it, though. The truth is that his criticisms are designed to abrogate some of our most fundamental freedoms. And they're working; they're having the desired effect.
[img]http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:wZGKtfSDcPHOVM:http://www.ucgstp.org/lit/gn/gn036/darwinism.gif&t=1[/img]
When Obama tells us that anyone who disagrees with him is a potential terrorist, he somehow fails to mention that his rodomontades have proven to be a complete disaster in both theory and practice. He fails to mention that his fairy tales are an ugly circle that begins and ends with him. And he fails to mention that he who pays the piper calls the tune. With that in mind, I did a little research to find where he gets his money. It turns out that it comes primarily from loopy lummoxes, intellectually challenged, impractical urban guerrillas, and—you guessed it—loud, jackbooted publishers of hate literature. This explains why Obama is proof that ignorance often drives misperceptions. (Note the heroic restraint stopping me from saying that Obama's crabby ploys are an evil without remedy.) Before you read this letter, you might have thought that Pres. Barack Hussein Obama II's decisions are based on reason. Now you know that he has an ego of galactic proportions.
In short, I clearly hope you understand what I believe in my personal perspective of this flawed man of flawed beliefs.
[quote]Barack Hussein Obama II[/quote]
Stopped reading there. The only people I know of that use his full name like that are Teabaggers and the hardcore Christian Right.
You're wrong and I didn't even read the OP :smug:
wow now we know
first we dont care how much you hate obama. second we have a blog forum for a purpose you know
And not a single fuck was given.
Most facepunchers here would either:
A) not read it all and get bored.
or
B) read it but hardly understand most of it.
I was A)
just be glad you don't have David Cameron.
op's gonna change the world
This is just a huge load of bullshit thinly veiled behind some big words. Whoever really wrote this makes no direct accusations using evidenced claims, just vague criticisms of manipulative people. This could be copy pasted for any leader ever. I doubt the op even read it all, and he sure as hell didn't understand it.
You said "Problem" like it was going to be short.
I feel misled.
[QUOTE=iPat;25404969]This is just a huge load of bullshit thinly veiled behind some big words. Whoever really wrote this makes no direct accusations using evidenced claims, just vague criticisms of manipulative people. This could be copy pasted for any leader ever. I doubt the op even read it all, and he sure as hell didn't understand it.[/QUOTE]
I wrote it, it's the truth.
Everyone involved in politics is an idiot.
Also, is this copypasta? Because this isn't a letter.
You think were gonna read all that? :lol:
[QUOTE=Handsome;25405013]I wrote it, it's the truth.[/QUOTE]
Ah, okay. Then what on earth are you talking about at the beginning of the 6th paragraph? What's this alien slime?
This is all based on a few very faulty assumption and no evidence whatsoever.
Also:
[quote]
In a rather infamous speech, Obama exclaimed that drug money is being used to pay for the construction of huge underground cities intended to house both humans and aliens who serve a secret, transnational shadow government. (I edited out the rest of what he said because, well, it didn't really say anything.)[/quote]
What the fuck is this about?
[QUOTE=Handsome;25404386][img_thumb]http://www.stop-obama.org/wp-content/uploads/obama-swastika.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE]
After I saw this, credibility was not found in any of OP's rantings.
[QUOTE=Jewsus;25405138]This is all based on a few very faulty assumption and no evidence whatsoever.
Also:
What the fuck is this about?[/QUOTE]
I'm going to assume that the letter was intended to be a joke.
[QUOTE=Playguy;25404542]Most facepunchers here would either:
A) not read it all and get bored.
or
B) read it but hardly understand most of it.
I was A)[/QUOTE]
That's because it's incomprehensible nonsense. Though OP has shown that he has an extensive vocabulary, his post was, as Hemingway would say "100% shit".
[editline]15th October 2010[/editline]
[QUOTE=CoolKingKaso;25405174]I'm going to assume that the letter was intended to be a joke.[/QUOTE]
By god I hope so...
[QUOTE=MrAfroShark70;25405161]After I saw this, credibility was not found in any of OP's rantings.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, if anything it should've been a communist flag or something.
If this was serious it would be 1000000x funnier.
and perhaps most unsurprisingly, teabaggers don't know about citations
Well slap my arse and call me sally it's another fuck stick who thinks the American public are going to elect a good president.
This just in:
No one gives a fuck!!
This is one of those essay generators, isn't it?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.