Volleyball captain that "brought her friend home" from party is a lying fuck - tweets show she was d
91 replies, posted
[quote]Cox did not appear in court this morning and sources at the court say she was not slated to appear with the other students who were cited for underage drinking in Boxford earlier this month. Because the students are all minors the court would not release any information on the status of the underage students who appeared in juvenile court today. Law Enforcement sources had also told the Valley Patriot that the media hype surrounding Erin Cox being suspended for allegedly giving her friend a ride home from a drinking party was … “a lie.”
Law enforcement sources in Boxford and North Andover also had told the Valley Patriot that social media posts show other students at the underage drinking party had posted on social media sites calling Cox a “liar” for claiming she was not at the underage drinking party when it was raided by police. [/quote]
In case anyone hadn't heard about it, a girl from my town was arrested at a huge party in the middle of nowhere. Her and her mother decided to kick back and say that she wasn't at the party and was only there to pick up a friend. This story earned national attention and thrust the girl, Erin Cox, into her 15 minutes of fame for her "good deed". However, the truth is finally beginning to be revealed. Students and parents that were at the party or came to pick up their kids are now making police statements saying that she was there long before the cops showed up and that she was equally as hammered as the rest of the bunch. It's not uncommon for someone to lie about going to a party, but if you're going to do it, here's a tip of advice: don't sue the school district when you are lying your ass off.
[editline]22nd October 2013[/editline]
Source: [url]http://valleypatriot.com/breaking-erin-cox-in-lawrence-district-court-for-possession-of-alcohol-family-giving-donations-back/[/url]
I thought the cops at the scene confirmed that she had not been drinking as per the original story.
[editline]22nd October 2013[/editline]
Even if she was lying about being there, if she was DD then that's still a good thing.
Teenage athletes will do anything to avoid getting busted at parties. Especially when it could cost them the season. Our starting quarterback got arrested for drinking at the beach. My town is notoriously hard on teen drinking because that's where all their revenue comes from, but the charges where mysteriously dropped and we ended up going to the playoffs that year.
[QUOTE=bord2tears;42611142]I thought the cops at the scene confirmed that she had not been drinking as per the original story.
[editline]22nd October 2013[/editline]
Even if she was lying about being there, if she was DD then that's still a good thing.[/QUOTE]
Im pretty sure the cops simply said she was never arrested.
The story says she was at the party BEFORE the cops showed up. apparently she was drunk at that time.
Who cares, the alcohol laws in the US are fucked up. The fact that she had to lie about it in the first place is ridiculous.
why not let the people have a fucking drink?
The drinking age in America is silly, I feel for you guys
I have some best friends that were at that party and although the lawsuit is still pending and I can't exactly share as many details as I would like, there is photographic proof of her alleged drunkenness at this party. The same story was told by almost every kid at that party. One of my best friends told me her mother came storming into the house screaming bloody murder.
[QUOTE=FFStudios;42611357]I have some best friends that were at that party and although the lawsuit is still pending and I can't exactly share as many details as I would like, there is photographic proof of her alleged drunkenness at this party. The same story was told by almost every kid at that party. One of my best friends told me her mother came storming into the house screaming bloody murder.[/QUOTE]
breakyourfaec is that you?
Wait so did her parents pick her up? Musn't that have meant her parents allowed her to drink? Are you not allowed to drink in the US even with parental consent? I mean we have some weird laws with drinking (ie cider w/ meal) but this just sounds shady as fuck.
[QUOTE=FinalHunter;42611345]"21?!? hurr that's so ridiculous." Grow up people.
[url]http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2827693/[/url][/QUOTE]
Yeah but it gets you laid
[QUOTE=FinalHunter;42611345]"21?!? hurr that's so ridiculous." Grow up people.
[url]http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2827693/[/url][/QUOTE]
look at your own source.
[quote]Research has shown that [B]heavy[/B] drinking during adolescence[/quote]
It specifically says heavy drinking. A drink or two is not going to do anything bad, and lowering the drinking age will make it less likely for teens to drink too much.
[QUOTE=Nightsure;42611399]Wait so did her parents pick her up? Musn't that have meant her parents allowed her to drink? Are you not allowed to drink in the US even with parental consent? I mean we have some weird laws with drinking (ie cider w/ meal) but this just sounds shady as fuck.[/QUOTE]
If they came into the house pissed off as fuck, i would think no
[QUOTE=Nightsure;42611399]Wait so did her parents pick her up? Musn't that have meant her parents allowed her to drink? Are you not allowed to drink in the US even with parental consent? I mean we have some weird laws with drinking (ie cider w/ meal) but this just sounds shady as fuck.[/QUOTE]
drinking with parental consent is perfectly legal at any age over 5 here
[QUOTE=A_Pigeon;42611395]breakyourfaec is that you?[/QUOTE]
uh no???
[QUOTE=FFStudios;42611493]uh no???[/QUOTE]
Fuck.
[QUOTE=FinalHunter;42611462]Jesus christ, how can you even dumb my post? How can you condone underage drinking when there is undeniable proof that it WILL damage brain development? If she's getting shitfaced at some party, chances are this isn't the first time. All these people who think "oh it's okay to just get drunk on weekends" are retarded.[/QUOTE]
Why can't people make that choice themselves?
These kind of choices are usually something you're legally allowed to make yourself once you're of legal age (which seems to be 18 in many places of the world).
Brain development doesn't stop at 21 for everyone, so should we increase the age further then? Or let people choose them fucking selves?
It's only this one article, and they only cited "police sources." It could be true, but it could also be this website trying to get attention.
[QUOTE=butre;42611451]drinking with parental consent is perfectly legal at any age over 5 here[/QUOTE]
In your own home.
Regardless if you have parental consent if your outside and you get caught being drunk its a Minor in Possession of a Controlled Substance. US alcohol laws are retarded.
[QUOTE=FinalHunter;42611462]The girl in question was drunk. I'd call that heavy drinking for someone that isn't even 21 years of age.
Jesus christ, how can you even dumb my post? How can you condone underage drinking when there is undeniable proof that it WILL damage brain development? If she's getting shitfaced at some party, chances are this isn't the first time. All these people who think "oh it's okay to just get drunk on weekends" are retarded.[/QUOTE]
I feel sorry for the entire nation here then because everyone drinks nearly weekly since around 16 years old.
While it's true that HEAVY drinking will impact growth, you're missing the point completely. Getting smashed once every half year or having a glass of wine once a week/day is far from going to damage you to a point where you'd be even close to having any damage done to your brain development.
Heavy drinking means drinking to the phase of SEVERE judgment impairment/getting dizzy/throwing up, seriously, you link wikipedia yet cant even look up what [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short-term_effects_of_alcohol]HEAVY drinking as you so put it means[/url]. You get drunk off one beer to a point where you can notice you're drunk, does that mean you're drinking heavily? Never mind the fact that teenagers love to brag about how much they drink because... well they're teenagers.
Somehow i doubt you have any realistic experience with alcohol, because if you did you'd know how full of shit you sound right now.
[QUOTE=FinalHunter;42611605]Go ahead, lower the drinking age then. Watch the amount of teen deaths to drunk driving skyrocket some more.
Just because people think they were responsible enough to handle alcohol as teenagers doesn't mean everybody is.[/QUOTE]
I don't think that's necessarily the case. Because it's illegal people often leave while drunk in order to not get caught. They're more hesitant to call their parents even. Also, the idea of being an adult without being able to drink is one of the most mind-boggling stupid laws.
[QUOTE=butre;42611451]drinking with parental consent is perfectly legal at any age over 5 here[/QUOTE]
Only on your own private property and even then many states have laws that forbid it till 21 anyway iirc.
[QUOTE=FinalHunter;42611345]"21?!? hurr that's so ridiculous." Grow up people.
[url]http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2827693/[/url][/QUOTE]
to be fair, playing football today has the same cognitive effect as a few cases of beer
[QUOTE=Sableye;42611675]to be fair, playing football today has the same cognitive effect as a few cases of beer[/QUOTE]
Football is incredibly dangerous. I would never encourage a child to play it. But we don't really know Hunter's stance on football.
[QUOTE=TestECull;42611433]look at your own source.
It specifically says heavy drinking. A drink or two is not going to do anything bad, and lowering the drinking age will make it less likely for teens to drink too much.[/QUOTE]
If most teens are going to drink at parties, how does that make it less likely for teens to drink too much if the whole POINT of going to a party is to drink a lot?
[QUOTE=FinalHunter;42611345]"21?!? hurr that's so ridiculous." Grow up people.
[url]http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2827693/[/url][/QUOTE]
Going to Afghanistan and getting a brain injury hurts cognitive tasks as well.
The age of 21 isn't because of healthy studies or risks, it was because of the prohibition.
[QUOTE=FinalHunter;42611812]I think there is a little more involved in joining the military than opening a bottle and drinking, and I never said that's why they made the law that way, I was simply supporting it staying that way.[/QUOTE]
If someone is old enough to join the military and fight or die for their country why are they not old enough to drink?
If you can give some logic to that, go right ahead.
Someone needs to buy FinalHunter his first alcoholic drink
[QUOTE=FinalHunter;42611462]The girl in question was drunk. I'd call that heavy drinking for someone that isn't even 21 years of age.
Jesus christ, how can you even dumb my post? How can you condone underage drinking when there is undeniable proof that it WILL damage brain development? If she's getting shitfaced at some party, chances are this isn't the first time. All these people who think "oh it's okay to just get drunk on weekends" are retarded.[/QUOTE]
Changing the legal limit to 40 still wouldn't reduce the damage done. It's 18 over here and kids started drinking at like 14 but no one gives a fuck because there's a huge difference between heavy drinking and having a few beers on a friday every 2 weeks. We and pretty much the rest of Europe cope with it absolutely fine, why is it such a problem in the US?
[QUOTE=butre;42611451]drinking with parental consent is perfectly legal at any age over 5 here[/QUOTE]
What state is that?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
