The White House just accidentally shared an article condemning Donald Trump
23 replies, posted
[quote]The White House sends out a regular email sharing coverage (predominantly positive) of Trump and his administration.
Today, the White House accidently (we assume) shared a satirical article from the Washington Post, slagging off Trump’s budget: proof they didn’t read beyond the (sarcastic) headline.[/quote]
[url]https://www.indy100.com/article/white-house-shared-fake-news-email-trump-budget-washington-post-sarcastic-headline-7635901[/url]
The article the WH shared:
[url]https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/compost/wp/2017/03/16/trumps-budget-makes-perfect-sense-and-will-fix-america-and-i-will-tell-you-why/?utm_term=.ffdf82b5f3b3[/url]
I'm fucking dying.
"With the money we will save on these sad public servants, we will be able to buy lots of GUNS and F-35s and other cool things that go BOOM and POW and PEW PEW PEW."
[QUOTE]Agriculture Department: NO MORE OF THIS NAMBY-PAMBY “GATHERING” NONSENSE. We will be HUNTERS again. This is also why we are cutting the Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children: Let them FIGHT for their meat or have NONE.[/QUOTE]
fucking a+
Again, it makes sense that Trump's people couldn't tell a satirical article from real news. :v:
And reality dives another hundred meters into crazy
[QUOTE][B]Labor Department:[/B] There will be no LABOR in the future. Labor is what women do, I think. All fetuses will burst out of wombs brandishing an Uzi on each arm.[/QUOTE]
fucking incredible
Question to those who are more familiar with this kind of stuff, does the White House have the same rules that SH does about not reading articles? Would this result in a ban?
[QUOTE=Steel & Iron;51979995]Question to those who are more familiar with this kind of stuff, does the White House have the same rules that SH does about not reading articles? Would this result in a ban?[/QUOTE]
If the White House had the same rules about news and sources that SH has they'd never link any articles at all.
I didn't know The Onion owned Washington Post.
[QUOTE]We must go back to the America that was great, when the air was full of coal and danger and the way you could tell if the air was breathable was by carrying a canary around with you at all times, perched on your leathery, coal-dust-covered finger.[/QUOTE]
pure gold
wake me up inside
cant wake up
[quote]Affordable housing is a luxury and we are going to get rid of it. Donald Trump does not live in affordable housing and neither should you.[/quote]
:v:
What is happening
I'm confused
lmao
This is so embarrassing.
what the fuck straight from the Onion. i can't tell the different between The Onion or not the Onion these day haha
edit:[QUOTE]Chemical Safety Board: Give us CHEMICAL DANGER, which sounds way more metal.[/QUOTE]
:v:
The article sounds like something out of the GTA universe.
[QUOTE=Steel & Iron;51979995]Question to those who are more familiar with this kind of stuff, does the White House have the same rules that SH does about not reading articles? Would this result in a ban?[/QUOTE]
But the title said Trump's budget was great! Why would they say something they didn't mean? /s
Funny to think that, for all of Trump's talk about fake news, his White House has just shared literal fake news. What a world we live in.
The headline worked exactly as intended. this is a president and administration that couldn't​ be damned to proofread a god damned thing after all
I think we're very quickly living in a world of no real government. This is not what I think of when I think of a government. There's no work being done here at all.
[QUOTE=Vegetable;51981751]I think we're very quickly living in a world of no real government. This is not what I think of when I think of a government. There's no work being done here at all.[/QUOTE]
That was the entire intent. They are dismantling the federal government entirely.
So what was that about fake news? Hmm, good going WH, you just shared something completely fake.
[QUOTE=Disgruntled;51985629]That was the entire intent. They are dismantling the federal government entirely.[/QUOTE]
Ah yes, dismantle the federal government in charge of regulations and quality control in favor of milli/billionaires that are [B]so for the people![/B]
I'm glad the [I]~~special interests~~[/I] of the United States "government" takes precedence over the day-to-day actions of the common people.
But sure, "he's for the people".
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.