[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pi7ypKqXhb4[/media]
can't be that bad.
This movie sounds so bad, that I have to go see it to believe it.
Oh god it was so bad.
It is very very bad. Richard Roper calls it one of the worst films he'd ever seen.
Went to watch this with my girlfriend (Instead of Les Misérables..., I know.))
Fuck this movie
usually I like to reserve judgement on a movie until I've seen it for myself but sometimes it's pretty obvious that I won't like it very much.
[editline]30th January 2013[/editline]
he has testicles on his chin!
Literally
We all sat in the theatre afterwards like "What the fuck did we just watch?" I could hear everybody in the room saying it.
I haven't seen it but isn't this film being almost universally panned?
it has 4% on Rotten Tomatoes haha holy shit
I don't want to see it now. Because I think it looks hilarious, and I hate when something doesn't live up to expectations. i always try to convince myself otherwise.
The actors must have been paid a hell of a lot.
I really want to see it because it looks like a massive steaming pile of shit. It boggles my mind how they got a lot of high profile actors for this movie
There you have it one of the first worst films of the 2010's
[QUOTE][B]Interview question online:[/B] Was that part of the appeal of the project – to do a sketch comedy for cinemas?
[B]Stephen Merchant: [/B]You know what – the appeal of the project – I did a film with Peter Farrelly and Peter said ‘Do you want to do a sketch where you’re on a date with Halle Berry?’ And I was like ‘Yep’. There wasn’t really any thought after that to be honest. So that was the reason I did it. I like Peter and I was happy to sit opposite Halle Berry for two days. That was my main motivation for doing it.[/QUOTE]
Guardian emailed him asking him why the hell he signed up for such a shit film. The reply:
"I had to spend two days looking at Halle Berry. It was a living hell."
Glad something funny came out of this.
I laughed more during Schindler's List.
Apparently it only cost 6 million to make. So easy money.
That's why all these names got involved. It's made 8 million in Russia alone.
[QUOTE=Dan2593;39413450]Apparently it only cost 6 million to make. So easy money.
That's why all these names got involved. It's made 8 million in Russia alone.[/QUOTE]
Eh I dunno, low budget means paying them almost nothing up front and somehow I doubt they'd be willing to give every actor a cut of the films profits. It was probably just the fact it was a really quick side project that they thought would be funny/a chance to work with other celebrities they liked. Plus they spent 4 years doing this and some of the filming only took a week, just to get all these celebrities together.
But lol, 4 years of work and this is the result.
what if the plan was to make a movie so shitty you'd have to see it to believe it
[QUOTE=pie_is_good;39413073]usually I like to reserve judgement on a movie until I've seen it for myself but sometimes it's pretty obvious that I won't like it very much.
[editline]30th January 2013[/editline]
he has testicles on his chin![/QUOTE]
Would you say that gag is put to better use this way?
[img]http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3473/3382269438_5671d31e46.jpg[/img]
WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT?
They should have called this "Movie 86"
i can't adequately describe the feelings i had watching this movie. if i had to break it down into one word, it'd be "hopelessness"
[editline]30th January 2013[/editline]
or "despair"
I just read the wikipedia page
[quote]Beezel
Directed by James Gunn
Amy (Elizabeth Banks) worries that her boyfriend Anson’s (Josh Duhamel) cat, Beezel (an animated cartoon) is coming between their relationship. Beezel seems to detest Amy and anyone who comes between him and Anson, but Anson only sees Beezel as innocent. One day, Amy witnesses Beezel masturbating to photos of Anson in a swimsuit, and Beezel attacks her and urinates on her. Anson still finds his pet innocent but Amy threatens to leave if he doesn't get rid of Beezel. Caring more about his relationship, Anson agrees to find a new home for him. That night, Beezel tearfully watches the couple make love from a closet. The next day when it comes time to take Beezel away, he is nowhere to be found. Amy goes to look outside to look. Beezel then runs her over with a truck and attempts to shoot her to death, but she chases him into the street and begins beating him with a shovel, which is witnessed by a group of children attending a birthday party at a neighboring house. When Anson approaches to see what is happening, Amy tries to explain Beezel’s motives. Beezel acts innocent and Anson sides with his cat. The children of the party then attack Amy, stabbing her with plastic forks. Anson grabs Beezel as he again fantasizes about French kissing his owner.[/quote]
what the fuck
[QUOTE=AK'z;39413667]WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT?[/QUOTE]
it's a ball-chinnian
[QUOTE=postal;39413755]I just read the wikipedia page
[quote]Beezel[/quote]
what the fuck[/QUOTE]
I don't think I have a vocabulary large enough to describe what I feel
It worked. Now I want to see it.
[editline]30th January 2013[/editline]
It's the movie equivalent of that Molyneux cube tapping game.
[QUOTE=postal;39413755]I just read the wikipedia page
what the fuck[/QUOTE]
Not even funny. Sounds like a nightmarish episode of The Twilight Zone.
Specially the bit they catch the cartoon cat wanking.
[quote]
As the ads for "Movie 43" promised (threatened?), you can't un-see this thing, so please: Stay away. Even if you might think that sitting through "Movie 43" would be an adventure along the lines of experiencing "Showgirls" or "Howard the Duck," you'll be filled with regret five minutes into this atrocity. There's camp-fun bad and interestingly horrible bad, and then there's just awful.
"Movie 43" is the "Citizen Kane" of awful.
[/quote]
Exerpt from Roger Ebert's review
[url]http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20130123/REVIEWS/130129973[/url]
[QUOTE=Yumyumbublegum;39414573]Exerpt from Roger Ebert's review
[url]http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20130123/REVIEWS/130129973[/url][/QUOTE]
[quote]by Richard Roeper[/quote]
not his review but yeah that much hatred is too good to miss.
I don't want to see this because I fear I'd lose respect for some of the actors in it.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.