[Media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wY53IlNKdqw[/media]
looks ok i guess
(p.s i dont care if im late fuckers)
I bet it won't be as good as the original.
It was inevitable I think.
[editline]02:25AM[/editline]
haha michael bay
So now the movie's recipe will change to: Explosions, babes... and cut up faces.
I didn't really care for the old one, so I don't have any hope for this.
They fucked up Freddy's face. Instantly ruins the character. And the voice sucked.
Hey look an abandoned warehouse lets go in there were they will be sure to get me..... oh no im on fire lets just take this jacket off and not even think twice about stop dropping and rollin
[QUOTE=MrTwicks;19222857]Hey look an abandoned warehouse lets go in there were they will be sure to get me..... oh no im on fire lets just take this jacket off and not even think twice about stop dropping and rollin[/QUOTE]
Because stopping, dropping and rolling in lit gasoline is such a good idea, right?
wasnt it just an explosion ?
[QUOTE=MrTwicks;19223239]wasnt it just an explosion ?[/QUOTE]
From the gasoline canister they threw inside.
[QUOTE=13illay;19223006]Because stopping, dropping and rolling in lit gasoline is such a good idea, right?[/QUOTE]
haha
[QUOTE=MrTwicks;19223239]wasnt it just an explosion ?[/QUOTE]
Michael Bay
A remake.... How original.
The future tells me this movie will have a lot of car explosions
No Robert Englund = instantly sucks.
[QUOTE=The_Marine;19224561]No Robert Englund = instantly sucks.[/QUOTE]
Agreed. That guys face was CGI I think. Makes the whole movie shit.
he looks like a ghoul from fallout 3 now
Oh god... They're getting it all wrong.
A) Freddy wasn't that young. In that part in the beginning, he looked like was in his 20's. He's actually in his 50's.
B) That face isn't Freddy. It... Looks kinda like Voldemort from Harry Potter... I mean look at his nose.
C) His voice is too high.
D) It looks really actiony... Nightmare on Elm St. is horror... (at least the first 2 or 3 films were).
E) It... Just doesn't LOOK like a Nightmare movie...
I am only gonna see it cuz I am a die-hard Freddy fan.
And the only things they got right were:
The glove, the name, and the "Freddy" song
[editline]01:24AM[/editline]
Actually, he looks EXACTLY like the Grinch...
Bah, I was hoping it was made by Rob Zombie.
Michael Bay eh?
Freddy has turned from spikey fingers to rocket propelled fingernails and explodes 5 times in the film for no particular reason, without the house damaged and in slow-motion ofcourse.
That's all there are these days, fucking remakes. How about some original shit?
you know its not going to be a good movie when they tell you not to fall asleep during the trailer
[QUOTE=Zatar963;19227892]
D) It looks really actiony... Nightmare on Elm St. is horror... (at least the first 2 or 3 films were).
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=ssa gib A;19223675]Michael Bay[/QUOTE]
blankquote
It irritates me that they've done this.
I especially hate the fact that they a lot of those scenes were from the original but the technology was just updated, and honestly, it makes things look worse.
Take the scene where Tina is lifted off of the bed for instance...in this preview she floats straight up into the air. In the original, she thrashes violently as if struggling with an unseen attacker.
That's one of the most memorable scenes from any horror movie I've ever watched and they screwed it up.
[QUOTE=MiKeV;19228259]That's all there are these days, fucking remakes. How about some original shit?[/QUOTE]
Because no real film director at this day in age has the brains to figure out one themselves.
[QUOTE=MrTwicks;19222199]
(p.s i dont care if im late fuckers)[/QUOTE]
Hell yeah, you so gangsta!
How the hell did you see his face? I'm talking about the fucked up one. I only really saw his glove and arm he was in silhouette for 3.5/4s of the last bit.
like last 10 seconds
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
