Seven Psychopaths - The new film by writer/director of "In Bruges" and starring Colin Farrel, Sam Ro - General

[IMG]http://img39.imageshack.us/img39/8606/seveni.png[/IMG] [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6HJoOt0jS9Q[/media] The plot [quote]The R-rated film follows a struggling screenwriter (Colin Farrell) who inadvertently becomes entangled in the Los Angeles criminal underworld after his oddball friends (Christopher Walken and Sam Rockwell) kidnap a gangster's (Woody Harrelson) beloved Shih Tzu. [/quote] I fucking loved "In Bruges", so obviously this has been one of my most anticipated films of the year for some time now. The trailer JUST came out, so we're finally getting a real look at it. Looks like it could be another great film with ridiculous characters.

This is terrific.

Tom Waits and Christopher Walken? Awesome.

you had me at the title. :gizz: [editline]14th August 2012[/editline] HOLY SHIT TOM WAITS ISN'T JUST LETTING THEM USE HIS LISCENSED MUSIC, HE'S AN ACTUAL CHARACTER! omgomgomgomgomg and sammy and christopher (not to mention colin)? this is like a giant clusterfuck of everything great in my life. [editline]14th August 2012[/editline] woody harlson..? if they fuck this up my head is going to explode

Fuck yes Sam Rockwell

Tom Waits and Christopher Walken in the same movie? I don't think the world is ready for this

Any time Tom Waits is in a movie I get interested.

I don't like how it's all flashy about being weird and super-funny-awkward-weird but that could be the trailer. I'll see.

The trailers making it out to be a lot less dark then I bet it actually will be, like trailers often do for dark comedies. Don't expect the movie to have the same tone/mood. Watch In Bruges if you want to know what this one is probably gonna be like. oh and btw, mickey rourke was originally gonna play woody's role, but got angry because the director didn't offer him enough money and left, telling the press that the director is a 'jerkoff' because of that and can 'go play with himself'. Rourke is quite the goofy bitch. Woody's cooler anyways.

oh god, In Bruges was [i]fantastic.[/i] and with a cast as solid as this?? I'm stoked. currently this, looper, and django unchained are my three most anticipated upcoming films

I know In Bruges, I just don't like trailers showing all the stuff the movie is about in this "you have to see this" way, I like when they make you interested, "here is something, watch the movie if you want to understand". I can already tell most of the movie after seeing this trailer :( And I don't really know if I want to see "dognapping went wrong but through a series of wacky coincidences eveything kinda goes right" no matter how quirky, psychotic and out of the order or awkwardly funny the characters are. Maybe I'm too negative.

Good team, 6 good actors and Colin Farrel's eyebrows, should be a very good film hopefully. Thanks for posting.

I fucking loved In Bruges. Trailer reminded me of Snatch or something

if kevin spacey was in this movie the world would implode. [editline]14th August 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=zingo;37239961]I fucking loved In Bruges. Trailer reminded me of Snatch or something[/QUOTE] that's probably the part i hated the most about the movie. the backwards assed marketing. they made it out to be some kind of fast paced guy richie venture. and while it does contain large amounts of richidium it's a much darker and slower paced movie. but it's still just as funny. [editline]14th August 2012[/editline] true grit was even worse. for anyone who didn't already know the story the commercials convinced them (and me) that the movie was going to be about some unapologetic chaotic neutral badass (jeff bridges), possibly with some of those "leon the professional" themes if the trailers featured the girl a lot. the actual movie was more of a roving farce than a fierce journey. jeff is simply some goofy old drunk has been and the fucking movie revolves around the little girl basically. i don't know why it was rated R.

oh boy oh boy I can't wait Here's the problem, movie lacks Ralph Fiennes [editline]15th August 2012[/editline] I hope it'll be as good as In Bruges

Christopher Walken [i]and[/i] Woody Harrelson? This is gonna rock.

haha Tom fucking Waits? oh my god this cast, man

i hope tom really got into making his character "his", hopefully even wrote some.

I watched In Bruges yesterday, definitely looking forward to this

I was already laughing through most of that trailer, then it got to Walken's reaction to the shotgun and I just lost it. I have to see this.

[quote]Christopher Walken[/quote] SOLD to the movie with the Walken

I'm so hyped for this movie, such an awesome looking cast and I thought In Bruge was great. This is a must watch for me. Also Tom Waits.

The uncut trailer is out now. I'm not watching anymore from this, though. Just gonna spoil it for myself. BUT HEY if you want to, HERE IT IS: [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6HJoOt0jS9Q[/media] [editline]31st August 2012[/editline] oh well all that's different is it has more "FUCKS" I'll just replace the OP one with this, then.

[img]http://img838.imageshack.us/img838/848/sevenpsychodog.jpg[/img] You can call the number to hear a recording of his character, and here's the twitter account: [url]https://twitter.com/PsychoCostello[/url]

I like how they say "shit" on one line, then "s#*t" on the very next line lol

Reading that mock up poster makes me think i'm going to end up feeling really bad for Haralson's character, even if he is supposed to be the antagonist.

i hope he tweaks the fuck out like he did in a scanner darkly. he has the potential to royally freak the fuck out but i don't think i've ever seen him really do it.

[QUOTE=Joz;37236575]Tom Waits and Christopher Walken? Awesome.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=OutOfExile2;37237406]Tom Waits and Christopher Walken in the same movie? [/QUOTE] not sure what these both have in common, but is gonna be good. :) [editline]15th September 2012[/editline] also what the fuck happened with Mickey Rourke in this movie? That's some A-class bullshit right there. Too bad I don't care, but still.

Mickey Rourke was replaced due to "creative differences," I believe. It was probably 'cause Mickey was only able to act all tough guy when the character needed a humorous touch.