'Conclusive proof' of foreign vessel in Sweden - Polidicks

[img]http://i.imgur.com/RVShgXe.jpg[/img] [QUOTE]Speaking at a packed press conference on Friday, Supreme Commander of the Swedish Armed Forces Sverker Göransson revealed that a foreign vessel was in Stockholm's archipelago in October.But he said the Swedish military had been [B]unable to determine which country[/B] it came from. "We have confirmation that there has been a small submarine in the archipelago," he told reporters. Prime Minister Stefan Löfven added: "[B]We will defend our territorial integrity using all means at our disposal.[/B]" He also [B]announced the creation of a new national security council [/B]amid a deteriorating global security situation. [/QUOTE] More here : [url]http://www.thelocal.se/20141114/conclusive-proof-of-foreign-vessel-in-sweden[/url] [editline]14th November 2014[/editline] [QUOTE]In addition to the decisive observation, a number of other observations have been analyzed and reach the second highest level of assessment grading. A picture taken by a member of the public shows an object moving at a speed of approximately 1 knot. The picture also shows the kind of spray that arises when water is pushed out of scuttles at the top of a submarine. A second o[B]bservation was made by a naval corvette.[/B] Following [B]strong indications on its sensors,[/B] a closer examination of the area was conducted and [B]recently made traces were found [/B]on the bottom. Another observation was made by a resident in the archipelago, observing an underwater body with distinctive features. [B]Sensors from the Swedish Armed Forces also confirmed echoes in the area[/B]. Similar [B]observations were made by multiple credible sources.[/B] - Each of these observations has a high credibility. Together with other observations, and a confirmed submarine, they generate a pattern. Thus, the intelligence operation confirms that a foreign power has violated Swedish territorial integrity. The gravity of this is obvious, says Supreme Commander Sverker Göranson. [/QUOTE] [url]http://www.forsvarsmakten.se/en/news/2014/11/confirmed-submarine-in-the-stockholm-archipelago/[/url]

Looks like a giant snake. :tinfoil:

looks like ebola

[QUOTE=Grenadiac;46491797]Looks like a giant snake. :tinfoil:[/QUOTE] Jörmungandr has returned!

[QUOTE]amid a deteriorating global security situation.[/QUOTE] It's not that bad, is it?

[QUOTE=Bradyns;46491845]It's not that bad, is it?[/QUOTE] the current world is worse than it has been in a looooooooooooooooooooooooooong time

[QUOTE=SexualShark;46491945]the current world is worse than it has been in a looooooooooooooooooooooooooong time[/QUOTE] You're saying that we're in a worse state than in ww2 because that isn't a looong time ago.

I actually went to Sweden for the holidays recently and also have proof that there is indeed a submarine. [IMG]http://puu.sh/cR1WS/8d137b763c.jpg[/IMG] I know the pic is kind of blurry but I'm almost positive it's a submarine.

[QUOTE=Hogie bear;46491957]You're saying that we're in a worse state than in ww2 because that isn't a looong time ago.[/QUOTE] 70 something years is a loooong time (25567 days, 613607 hours) also i never said it was worse than wwii

obviously the russians

So is that a map of the seabed and that line is where the sub beach itself?

There was no submarine.

[QUOTE=laserguided;46493291]There was no submarine.[/QUOTE] Going to need to see your working for that. When presented with proof that there appears to have been one, you're going to need to demonstrate some stronger proof for your statement.

[QUOTE=laserguided;46493291]There was no submarine.[/QUOTE] I presume this confidence stems from you having been on the very submarine that wasn't there.

[QUOTE=laserguided;46493291]There was no submarine.[/QUOTE] There was no Russia.

[QUOTE=Fatfatfatty;46491818]looks like ebola[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=Grenadiac;46491797]Looks like a giant snake. :tinfoil:[/QUOTE] Should have clarified, that's not the submarine. That's the trail it left on the seabed.