Instead of introducing a cute new character to show off new technology, they reuse a character from an IP that hasn't been used for 11 years meant for gross, ugly, mature stuff and try to make it look cute...
[QUOTE=MasterKade;51044957]Instead of introducing a cute new character to show off new technology, they reuse a character from an IP that hasn't been used for 11 years meant for gross, ugly, mature stuff and try to make it look cute...[/QUOTE]
thing is, conker was already fucking adorable. thats the whole point. they switched it up by making him horrifying and kid friendly.
[QUOTE=TheJoey;51044962]thing is, conker was already fucking adorable. thats the whole point. they switched it up by making him horrifying and kid friendly.[/QUOTE]
I think the theory that they originally had a frog character and Microsoft higher-ups insisted they change it to Conker but they didn't have time to redo all of the animations is a pretty good one.
Also, young Conker is already a character. Whatever happened in the cancelled kiddy Conker game is still canon.
He didn't look like he came out of Chernobyl though.
[IMG]http://conkershomeland.lajnus.com/images/conkerhistory/conker.jpg[/IMG]
The horror.
[QUOTE=usaokay;51046070]Rare isn't Rare anymore.
It's just a mishmash of family-friendly games that Microsoft wants to spew out.[/QUOTE]
Playtonic seems much more of a continuation of Rare now than the actual company.
[video=youtube;vTcheaqt0rU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTcheaqt0rU[/video]
No but seriously that game looks fucking awful.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.