How To Stone Criminals To Death. Step-by-step tutorial by Ahmedinejad. - Polidicks

[IMG]http://nationalpostnews.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/na0124_stoningweb940.jpg[/IMG] That's fucking sick! [URL="http://news.nationalpost.com/2010/11/20/graphic-anatomy-of-a-stoning/"]Source[/URL] [highlight](User was banned for this post ("adf.ly" - Gran PC))[/highlight]

Jesus fuck.

Glad we cleared that up.

Disgusting. That has to be near the top of my list of shitty ways to die

How civilized.

This makes me sad and angry.

Why can't they at least just shoot the poor bugger instead of making them going through this shit.

This makes hanging and guillotining look civilized. Well, if I had to chose execution, it would be by guillotine, since all it takes is a second and it slices through your neck very quickly.

There are many videos on youtube with live stoning in them and eeeaaaaauuuuuurghaaaaa

[QUOTE=GyroburnerV2;39671651]Why can't they at least just shoot the poor bugger instead of making them going through this shit.[/QUOTE] Shooting? What about locking him/her up in a prison instead of killing someone.

Adf.ly?

[QUOTE=darth-veger;39671667]Shooting? What about locking him/her up in a prison instead of killing someone.[/QUOTE] Or better yet do nothing because it's already being done for a really stupid excuse which is adultery.

[QUOTE=darth-veger;39671667]Shooting? What about locking him/her up in a prison instead of killing someone.[/QUOTE] Well yeah that'd be preferable, but I doubt they'd make the change any time soon. If they're going to be morons they could at least lessen the suffering for the victims.

-snip-

[QUOTE=darth-veger;39671667]Shooting? What about locking him/her up in a prison instead of killing someone.[/QUOTE] He's saying "at least". As in, if they're already going to execute him instead of acting like people within the 21st century.

[QUOTE=GyroburnerV2;39671686]Well yeah that'd be preferable, but I doubt they'd make the change any time soon. If they're going to be morons they could at least lessen the suffering for the victims.[/QUOTE] I think they mean, that if given the option between eating a gun or being stoned, I'd take the gun thanks. Though I'd prefer neither

[QUOTE=Malos;39671696]That's really not a good way to go, since [B]you're still conscious for up to two minutes after you've been decapitated.[/B] Really, the only painless way you can be executed is by lethal injection, and that's expensive and can screw up pretty badly. The only winning move is to jail the guy.[/QUOTE] [URL="http://science.howstuffworks.com/life/inside-the-mind/human-brain/10-brain-myths6.htm"]No[/URL] [quote]These stories seem to give credence to the idea that it's possible for someone to remain conscious, even for just a few seconds, after being beheaded. However, most modern physicians believe that the reactions described above are actually reflexive twitching of muscles, rather than conscious, deliberate movement. Cut off from the heart (and therefore, from oxygen), the brain immediately goes into a coma and begins to die. According to Dr. Harold Hillman, consciousness is "probably lost within 2-3 seconds, due to a rapid fall of intracranial perfusion of blood" [source: New Scientist].[/quote] pls stop spreading misinformation okay thanks [editline]21st February 2013[/editline] I like how you changed it from 2 minutes to 30 seconds and are still wrong

[QUOTE=BlkDucky;39671735][URL="http://science.howstuffworks.com/life/inside-the-mind/human-brain/10-brain-myths6.htm"]No[/URL] pls stop spreading misinformation okay thanks [editline]21st February 2013[/editline] I like how you changed it from 2 minutes to 30 seconds and are still wrong[/QUOTE] Yeah, I looked it up and I was pretty damn wrong. Sorry about that. [QUOTE=Sobotnik;39671778]Not true, the loss of blood pressure happens very quickly, and the brain shuts down.[/QUOTE] I know, man. I know.

[QUOTE=Malos;39671696]That's really not a good way to go, since you're still conscious for up to two minutes after you've been decapitated.[/QUOTE] Not true, the loss of blood pressure happens very quickly, and the brain shuts down.

This is an awful, awful thing to say. But someone needs to make a photoshop contest out of the guys throwing the stones in the last two or three panels. [editline]21st February 2013[/editline] Sorry, gents. I can't be shocked or outraged by this stuff anymore. A little saddened, but that's as far as that goes. All human beings are scum of the earth deep down.

Hey look, they use a woman for the graph! And Ahmedinejad is responsible for every single stoning!

I love how they have a segment showing you precisely the correct rock to use when bludgeoning some one to death with it.

[QUOTE=Sobotnik;39671657]This makes hanging and guillotining look civilized. Well, if I had to chose execution, it would be by guillotine, since all it takes is a second and it slices through your neck very quickly.[/QUOTE] At the time of its invention, the guillotine was hailed as a great step forward in human rights, as a humane way to conduct executions.

The Guile-tine is still probably the cheapest, cleanest and most humane way of killing someone :v:

Title is bullshit, by the way.

[QUOTE=archangel125;39671929]Title is bullshit, by the way.[/QUOTE] Nope: [quote]The graphic below looks at how a stoning occurs in accordance with the exact language of the Iranian Penal Code.[/quote]

As disgusting as it all looks like, doesn't shock me. In my eyes, there's no "more" or "less barbaric" ways to execute a person, whoever he is, an adulterer or a mass murderer. Sole existance of death sentence is just barbaric enough. [b]Edit:[/b] I may have worded it incorrectly. What I actually mean is capital punishments like that are simply [b]wrong[/b] and there's no argument past that. It's like arguing over how humane you can make a genocide, with gas or starvation - you simply don't conduct a genocide, period.

[QUOTE=gudman;39671956]As disgusting as it all looks like, doesn't shock me. In my eyes, there's no "more" or "less barbaric" ways to execute a person, whoever he is, an adulterer or a mass murderer. Sole existance of death sentence is just barbaric enough.[/QUOTE] What? Does the suffering of the individual in question not increase the barbarity of the ordeal? Instant decapitation and death vs slow, agonizing death through rocks, tell me which one is more barbaric.

[QUOTE=gudman;39671956]As disgusting as it all looks like, doesn't shock me. In my eyes, there's no "more" or "less barbaric" ways to execute a person, whoever he is, an adulterer or a mass murderer. Sole existance of death sentence is just barbaric enough.[/QUOTE] Slow painful death VS something quick and nearly painless. Yes, there are more and less barbaric ways of executing someone, if execution must be done.

[QUOTE=legolover122;39672035]if execution must be done.[/QUOTE] Good luck defending the [b]need[/b] to execute the adulterer. That's simply [b]wrong[/b], there's no argument past that. It's like arguing over how humane you can make a genocide, with gas or starvation - you simply don't.