Michael Savage: 'Liberalism is a Mental Disorder' - Polidicks

[URL]http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=69296[/URL] [QUOTE]The incredibly popular Michael Savage – currently syndicated on about 350 stations from coast to coast – has been diagnosing liberal mental illness for more than a decade. Now, in his third and most insightful book, he strikes at the root of today's most desperate issues, providing a hefty dose of his unique conservative medicine. Through a compelling narrative of current trends and events, Savage chronicles the continued assault on the sacred pillars of American life (the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the Ten Commandments, the Sanctity of Marriage) by the High Priests of Ultra-Liberalism and provides the remedy for freedom-loving Americans to effectively medicate the mental disease of modern liberalism and restore America’s former brilliance. In each chapter, the Savage Spotlight of Truth casts its brilliant light on the tactics used by liberals to spread their leftist agenda and follow it with a dose of specific actions, arguments and activism that the listener can ingest to counter the left. After all, as Savage said in "The Savage Nation," America’s best days are in front of her, if we have the guts to face the truth and apply ourselves to repairing the foundation upon which this blessed nation was formed. [/QUOTE] Now, recognize that this is more of an ad for his book than anything. However, I couldn't let this little nugget of insanity escape once I saw it. Just reading for three seconds made me want to go hurt something. Go ahead, give it a read.

[quote]Savage chronicles the continued assault on the sacred pillars of American life (the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the Ten Commandments, the Sanctity of Marriage) by the High Priests of Ultra-Liberalism.[/quote] So a male Ann Coulter?

Oh god, someone posted about how liberals were communists in the comments.

:downs:

High Priest of Ultra Liberalism sounds like a kickass job to have. Where do I sign up for that?

[quote]by the High Priests of Ultra-Liberalism[/quote] Oh no, it's a cult now too!

From the comments: [quote=Terry McCarty]Folks, we just have to stop "promoting" the big lie: that a progressive is just a socialists, someone out to help the needed. And that is the big cover up lie they want you to believe. The whole truth is a progressive is nothing but a communist, a liberal is nothing but a communist.[/quote] Only one letter away from McCarthy, coincidence? You decide.

This is what Michael Savage actually believes: [img]http://www.pcgamewallpapers.net/1366x768/bioshock-infinite.jpg[/img]

What a blasphemer. How dare he say that the LORD Jesus Christ has mental issues? I pray for your soul, Michael Savage, but fear that salvation is all but lost to you.

[quote] But wait – it gets better. There's another part to this deal. When you order "Liberalism is a Mental Disorder" for $4.95, we will also send you, FREE, three sizzling issues of WND's critically acclaimed monthly magazine, Whistleblower. Many readers consider Whistleblower to be simply the world's best newsmagazine. Each issue focuses like a powerful laser on a single topic – from how to survive financial meltdown to understanding the [b]secret agendas of America's establishment elite[/b] – explored thoroughly, and with facts and insight such as you've never seen anywhere else. Recent issues include "SHADOW GOVERNMENT: [b]Inside the mad, mad, mad, mad world of Obama's czars[/b]," "MEDICAL MURDER: Why Obamacare could result in the early deaths of millions of baby boomers," "THE GREAT AWAKENING: [b]How tea partiers are setting a new course for America[/b]," "NARCISSIST IN CHIEF: Experts explain what makes Barack Obama tick" and "BLACK HOLE: The shocking truth about the U.S. economy – and what you can and must do."[/quote] Oh man, this gonna be good [img]http://www.gifflix.com/files/4326f39cc6e2.gif[/img]

I don't think he's aware that "czars" is just a scare term for various types of advisers. They haven't been actually called "czars" since their inception, and I imagine it was done away with because of just how stupid it sounds.

I think it's kind of weird how America still runs itself by a constitution that was written in 1787. Of course, it may be a [I]really good[/I] constitution, I don't know, but there must be a at least a few things in it that just aren't fit for the modern era. Very few people in the UK even knows we have a constitution, and we certainly don't revere it like Americans do theirs.

Alot of them seem pretty diluted to think their ideas for utopia would work and that republicans are holding them back. So it could be.

I've been told that I have been mentally manipulated by "my evil liberal parents" by a middle aged tea partier because I was helping when Obama showed up to Portland, Maine. I kicked him in the balls.

[QUOTE=Randdalf;32138292]I think it's kind of weird how America still runs itself by a constitution that was written in 1787. Of course, it may be a [I]really good[/I] constitution, I don't know, but there must be a at least a few things in it that just aren't fit for the modern era. Very few people in the UK even knows we have a constitution, and we certainly don't revere it like Americans do theirs.[/QUOTE] It's okay, all American politicians ignore it anyway. Some would argue that freedom applies to all times, forever.

[QUOTE=Rick Ross;32138311]Alot of them seem pretty diluted to think their ideas for utopia would work and that republicans are holding them back. So it could be.[/QUOTE] cool. i also understand the definition of a mental disorder and constantly strive to make excellent posts full of substance and biting criticisms. let's be bros

Since the freedom of slaves the right wing has been nothing but trouble. Not to say the left wing is perfect, we all have our problems.

This sounds a lot more like an opinion piece than news

[QUOTE=DesumThePanda;32138666]Since the freedom of slaves the right wing has been nothing but trouble. Not to say the left wing is perfect, we all have our problems.[/QUOTE] Perfect? No. Better? Yes. [editline]5th September 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Kiwi Bird;32138866]This sounds a lot more like an opinion piece than news[/QUOTE] It's a news article about a book. The book itself is an opinion "piece", but the article about the book is not.

[QUOTE=Randdalf;32138292]I think it's kind of weird how America still runs itself by a constitution that was written in 1787. Of course, it may be a [I]really good[/I] constitution, I don't know, but there must be a at least a few things in it that just aren't fit for the modern era. Very few people in the UK even knows we have a constitution, and we certainly don't revere it like Americans do theirs.[/QUOTE] Well, our constitution is non-codified, so technically it can be changed (and has been multiple times) by an act of parliament, and has no single defining document or law. Court cases can change our constitution.

Please don't post this bilge in the News section. This isn't news, this is just an idiot perpetuating idiocy. The only difference between this idiot and every other idiot is that this one has a microphone and a word processor. This bipartisan banner-waving is an ugly stain on the American political system.

[QUOTE=Big Dumb American;32138990]Please don't post this bilge in the News section. This isn't news, this is just an idiot perpetuating idiocy. The only difference between this idiot and every other idiot is that this one has a microphone and a word processor. This bipartisan banner-waving is an ugly stain on the American political system.[/QUOTE] I'd hardly call this bipartisan.

[QUOTE=Megafanx13;32138881]Perfect? No. Better? Yes. [editline]5th September 2011[/editline] It's a news article about a book. The book itself is an opinion "piece", but the article about the book is not.[/QUOTE] No, the article itself [i]is[/i] an opinion piece. Did you even read it? It describes the book and its author as compelling, insightful, brilliant, and accurate. This is not an objective article in the slightest, it is a paid advertisement. It's hard to get [i]less[/i] objective than a paid advertisement.

[img]http://i.imgur.com/Y2dew.gif[/img] This is a fine example of the intelligent, unbiased journalism ingrained into the roots of this most honourable website.

[QUOTE=Big Dumb American;32138990]Please don't post this bilge in the News section. This isn't news, this is just an idiot perpetuating idiocy. The only difference between this idiot and every other idiot is that this one has a microphone and a word processor. This bipartisan banner-waving is an ugly stain on the American political system.[/QUOTE] Well Michael Savage is pretty famous. When he says things it's quite newsworthy.

[QUOTE=Big Dumb American;32139028]No, the article itself [i]is[/i] an opinion piece. Did you even read it? It describes the book and its author as compelling, insightful, brilliant, and accurate. This is not an objective article in the slightest, it is a paid advertisement. It's hard to get [i]less[/i] objective than a paid advertisement.[/QUOTE] It does sound like a ad, with stuff like [quote]Save $21, get "Liberalism is a Mental Disorder" for only $4.95![/quote] and [quote] get your copy of this sizzling bestseller for only $4.95 – by taking advantage of this special offer, exclusively from WorldNetDaily[/quote] Actually, no, it's not like an ad, it [i]is[/i] a bloody ad

[QUOTE=Megafanx13;32139013]I'd hardly call this bipartisan.[/QUOTE] This is a symptom of the bipartisan state that America suffers under. The supporters of one team wave their banner and shout insults at the other team, while the other team does the same exact crap in reply. Olberman, Savage, Beck, Moore, Limbaugh; all of these so-called "political analysts" and "political activists" are blindly opposed to the [i]other team[/i], and have prioritized [i]trying to make the other team look stupid[/i] above all else. That's the current state of American politics, the issues have taken a backseat to bipartisan squabbling. Gay rights, immigration policies, abortion, economic frameworks, the healthcare system: we've been arguing in the exact same words about the exact same issues since our grandparents were children, and it devolved on a national level into ad hominem attacks against whatever "party" each side of the issue associates himself with long ago. If we ever to want to evolve as a society, we have to learn how to overcome this. It is ridiculous and embarrassing.

[QUOTE=Big Dumb American;32139028]No, the article itself [i]is[/i] an opinion piece. Did you even read it? It describes the book and its author as compelling, insightful, brilliant, and accurate. This is not an objective article in the slightest, it is a paid advertisement. It's hard to get [i]less[/i] objective than a paid advertisement.[/QUOTE] Oh, my bad. It seemed like it was just presenting the book's views as the books presents them. If it is in fact an opinion piece, then it's kind of a bad post. [editline]5th September 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Big Dumb American;32139115]This is a symptom of the bipartisan state that America suffers under. The supporters of one team wave their banner and shout insults at the other team, while the other team does the same exact crap in reply. Olberman, Savage, Beck, Moore, Limbaugh; all of these so-called "political analysts" and "political activists" are blindly opposed to the [i]other team[/i]. That's the current state of American politics, the issues have taken a backseat to bipartisan squabbling. Gay rights, immigration policies, abortion, economic frameworks, the healthcare system: we've been arguing in the exact same words about the exact same issues since our grandparents were children, it devolved on a national level into ad hominem attacks against whatever "party" each side of the issue associates himself with. It is ridiculous and embarrassing.[/QUOTE] To be fair, people like Olbermann and Maddow are not really comparable to Savage, Beck, or Limbaugh. They're on entirely different levels of extremism, and frankly you can't call Maddow or Olbermann extremists.

[QUOTE=Megafanx13;32139122]Oh, my bad. It seemed like it was just presenting the book's views as the books presents them. If it is in fact an opinion piece, then it's kind of a bad post.[/QUOTE] Should have checked the source, you would have known when the front page has the headline of [quote][b] WND Exclusive Leftist media employ devious, sinister tactic Journalists go on in-your-face mission to deceive Americans, alter perception --WND [/b][/quote] And every article seems to be showing of some book by the end

[QUOTE=Sumap;32139153]Should have checked the source, you would have known when the front page has the headline of And every article seems to be showing of some book by the end[/QUOTE] Yeah, I should've looked deeper.