Fire Safety? Regulation Against Smoking In Public Housing Spits In The Face Of Socialist Leeches, Li - Polidicks

[release][b]Do Liberals Hate Poor People?[/b] [img]http://nation.foxnews.com/sites/nation.foxnews.com/files/styles/dv1/public/Homeless_AP.jpg[/img] [i][b][u]They Hate Poor People[/b][/u] The liberals’ dirty little secret.[/i] By P.J. O'ROURKE, Weekly Standard On January 1, 2012, Maine became the first state to ban smoking in all low-income public housing. [b]Twelve thousand poor people faced their New Year’s Day hangover without the solace of a Marlboro[/b] to accompany their aspirin and coffee. Photo of person walking past a homeless person This, of course, was good. Just ask the high-minded, right-thinking progressive elites who, it’s safe to say, run Maine’s public housing authority. Progressive elites like to run things. They’d run the government, the media, and the entire U.S. economy if they could. Failing that, public housing authorities will do. The Detroit, San Antonio, and Portland, Oregon, housing authorities already ban smoking. Boston’s housing authority will do so in September. Los Angeles is expected to follow. And it’s no mystery what that highest-minded, most right-thinking, way-progressive elitist Mayor Bloomberg has in mind for New Yorkers.[/release] [img]http://i.imgur.com/WkkEo.png[/img] Wait a second... HOTELS BAN SMOKING TOO! [editline]24th January 2012[/editline] I find it funny how they don't even have the "YOU DECIDE" thing. It just asks the question then answers it. [editline]24th January 2012[/editline] [url]http://nation.foxnews.com/liberals/2012/01/23/do-liberals-hate-poor-people[/url]

Stay classy fox news, stay classy

I thought Fox News openly hated the poor.

[QUOTE=Thlis;34365735]I thought Fox News openly hated the poor.[/QUOTE] They say whatever they want and support them when it's convenient. For this, they're trying to support the tobaco industry.

[QUOTE=Thlis;34365735]I thought Fox News openly hated the poor.[/QUOTE] They openly hate whoever whenever it suits them best.

Soon: WE CAN'T SPIT GUM OUT ONTO THE SIDEWALK LIBERALS ARE TRYING TO TURN AMERICA INTO A TOTALITARIAN STATE [quote]Here's what we do know. A woman and her s e x organs are nobody's business. A woman and her lungs is the Housing Authorities business. Liberal Logic on display.[/quote] Jesus christ what the fuck conservatives, y u so wrong

[quote]This, of course, was good. Just ask the high-minded, right-thinking progressive elites who, it’s safe to say, run Maine’s public housing authority. [b]Progressive elites like to run things. They’d run the government, the media, and the entire U.S. economy if they could.[/b] Failing that, public housing authorities will do.[/quote] Yeah, completely unrelated bullshit propaganda. How does a new agency like this manage to stay open, and popular in the US?

[QUOTE=Ogopogo;34367004]Yeah, completely unrelated bullshit propaganda. How does a new agency like this manage to stay open, and popular in the US?[/QUOTE] Its because they appear to lack a law that prevents people broadcasting opinion and bullshit as news like the rest of the world does.

[QUOTE=Ogopogo;34367004]Yeah, completely unrelated bullshit propaganda. How does a new agency like this manage to stay open, and popular in the US?[/QUOTE] Same way ThinkProgress, RawStory, et. al stay afloat. You don't realize how loaded with propaganda and bias a particular source is if you happen to agree with it.

[QUOTE=Ogopogo;34367004]Yeah, completely unrelated bullshit propaganda. How does a new agency like this manage to stay open, and popular in the US?[/QUOTE] Fox News isn't a news agency. It's an entertainment provider. [editline]24th January 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=SPESSMEHREN;34367223]Same way ThinkProgress, RawStory, et. al stay afloat. You don't realize how loaded with propaganda and bias a particular source is if you happen to agree with it.[/QUOTE] I dunno. "Do Liberals hate poor people? They hate poor people" That seems like pretty once sided bias. Like anyone could agree that that's biased.

[QUOTE=Nikota;34367239]Fox News isn't a news agency. It's an entertainment provider. [/QUOTE] Isn't this the reason they were refused a broadcasting license in Canada [quote] Here's the deal. You take a handout from the government, they get to control your life. Simple. The government decides how you live, where you live, what you eat and so on. That's what you want? That's what you get. So hush up and eat your government cheese. [/quote] Unsure if they are being serious or not, they have a point though.

I think the company that was trying to make a Fox Canada, moreso than Sun News is, Quebecor, is fighting that case in court to get a Canadian equivalent of Fox News, because even Sun actually has to check their facts and tell their spin on the truth.

[QUOTE=Nikota;34367239]Fox News isn't a news agency. It's an entertainment provider. [/QUOTE] I am well aware of that, I just find it hard to believe that people take this a reputable news site. I am still surprised that it manages to stay open with the type of stuff it spews out.

[QUOTE=Ogopogo;34367349]I am well aware of that, I just find it hard to believe that people take this a reputable news site. I am still surprised that it manages to stay open with the type of stuff it spews out.[/QUOTE] Fox news also has no idea what disney is. As evident by this image. [url]http://gyazo.com/7c90fd6fac6edc9926d80c551e1d2fc6[/url]

The best part of this article is how they fail to establish a link between the smoking regulation and the article title.

[QUOTE=Baboo00;34367384]The best part of this article is how they fail to establish a link between the smoking regulation and the article title.[/QUOTE] Their job is to get semi literate people mad and laugh as the idiots don't question why.

Nikota do you go to Fox Nation just to re-post their bullshit here? It's a conservative oped forum and we don't really need their diarrhea regurgitated all over here. It's not even technically news. If you're going to post Fox News garbage at least use the real site rather than posting what some random conservative commentator decided to open their mouth about today. [editline]23rd January 2012[/editline] I mean, my mom watches Fox News all fucking day so I don't need to hear more of it, but if you're going to do it use actual news articles from their actual site not their shitty forum.

I dunno. The actual Fox website has comments disabled.

Yea, the posting of Fox Nation really needs to stop. It isn't news, it's a blog.

Alright. Democracy in action. As of 1/24/2012. I hereby resign from my position as the fox hunter.

[QUOTE=Omali;34367665]Yea, the posting of Fox Nation really needs to stop. It isn't news, it's a blog.[/QUOTE] So is gizmodo but that's posted all the times besides Fox itself isn't a news outlet anyway so if gizmodo and fox are fair game, so is fox nation [editline]24th January 2012[/editline] I think smoking inside with children shouldn't be legal not like banning it will solve anything though smokers gonna smoke (I would know)

When I post something from a gawker owned blog, I usually use the source but take their headlines sometimes. I haven't done that in months though.

[QUOTE=Nikota;34367653]I dunno. The actual Fox website has comments disabled.[/QUOTE] They're still there. You just have to click the "Comments" button. [url]http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/01/23/white-house-delay-budget-proposal-infuriates-republicans/#comment[/url]

[QUOTE=Contag;34367708]So is gizmodo but that's posted all the times besides Fox itself isn't a news outlet anyway so if gizmodo and fox are fair game, so is fox nation [editline]24th January 2012[/editline] I think smoking inside with children shouldn't be legal not like banning it will solve anything though smokers gonna smoke (I would know)[/QUOTE] I'm just going to use it once every 3 months or so for a good laugh.

[QUOTE=Omali;34367665]Yea, the posting of Fox Nation really needs to stop. It isn't news, it's a blog.[/QUOTE] Blogs are fine iirc. If Gawker media articles are allowed (and they appear to be) then this is fine. A lot of the stuff posted in this forum are op-ed's. Please carry on Nikota, I enjoy reading these.

[QUOTE=OvB;34367755]They're still there. You just have to click the "Comments" button. [url]http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/01/23/white-house-delay-budget-proposal-infuriates-republicans/#comment[/url][/QUOTE] [quote]OBAMA - First President to refuse to show a valid birth certificate. First President to apply for college aid as a foreign student, then deny he was a foreigner. First President to have a social security number from a state he has never lived in. First President to preside over a cut to the credit rating of the United States. First President to violate the War Powers Act. First President to be held in contempt of court for illegally obstructing oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico. First President to defy a Federal Judges court order to cease implementing the Health Care Reform Law. First President to require all Americans to purchase a product from a third party. First President to spend a trillion dollars on shovel-ready jobs and later admit there was no such thing as shovel-ready jobs. First President to abrogate bankruptcy law to turn over control of companies to his union supporters. First President to by-pass Congress and implement the Dream Act through executive fiat. First President to order a secret amnesty program that stopped the deportation of illegal immigrants across the U.S. , including those with criminal convictions. First President to demand a company hand-over $20 billion to one of his political appointees. First President to terminate Americas ability to put a man in space. First President to encourage racial discrimination and intimidation at polling places. First President to have a law signed by an auto-pen without being present. First President to arbitrarily declare an existing law unconstitutional and refuse to enforce it. First President to threaten insurance companies if they publicly speak-out on the reasons for their rate increases. First President to tell a major manufacturing company in which state they are allowed to locate a factory. First President to file lawsuits against the states he swore an oath to protect (AZ, WI, OH, IN) First President to withdraw an existing coal permit that had been properly issued years ago. First President to fire an inspector general of Ameri-corps for catching one of his friends in a corruption case. First President to appoint 45 Czars to replace elected officials in his office. First President to golf 73 separate times in his first two and a half years in office. First President to hide his medical, educational and travel records. First President to win a Nobel Peace Prize for doing NOTHING to earn it. First President to coddle American enemies while alienating Americas allies. First President to publicly bow to Americas enemies while refusing to salute the U.S. Flag. First President to go on multiple global apology tours. First President to go on 17 lavish vacations, including date nights and Wednesday evening White House parties for his friends, paid for by the taxpayer. First President to refuse to wear the U.S. Flag lapel pin. First President to have 22 personal servants (taxpayer funded) for his wife. First President to keep a dog trainer on retainer for $102,000.00 a year at taxpayer expense. First President to repeat the Holy Qur'an tells us, and openly admit the early morning call of the Azan (Islamic call to worship) is the most beautiful sound on earth.[/quote] I died a little inside after reading this comment.

I REALLY wish they didn't exist, their rhetoric is pathetic and disgusting. It's so sad that these rats call themselves "for the people" when all they do is sell themselves out like fucking cunts. I'm so pissed right now someone hold me.

[QUOTE=Ogopogo;34367825]*First President to yada yada...* I died a little inside after reading this comment.[/QUOTE] Welp. :suicide:

[QUOTE=Ogopogo;34367004]Yeah, completely unrelated bullshit propaganda. How does a new agency like this manage to stay open, and popular in the US?[/QUOTE] To be fair, this isn't exactly Fox News itself, this is the opinion section of their blog. Blogs typically are biased.

For those of us who don't live in the states, can anyone tell me what the American definition of the word "liberal" is? Because to me it sounds like someone who [I]doesn't[/I] lean more to the right than a person with their right leg chopped off. Also, merely biased? There's bias, and then there's blatant lying. [quote]Do Liberals Hate Poor People? They Hate Poor People The liberals’ dirty little secret.[/quote] How are Fox still fooling people with their "Fair and Balanced" crap?