This is really cool, it even changes light in the rest of the picture accordingly.
Why is Peele co-hosting this event?
that host lady screams at every one of those videos.
I really just want that women to shut up for 5 mins. Jeeze, it ain't magic but its a hell of a tool: we get that.
I noticed both photos they used have very flat skylines, i'm wondering how it would go with a nature picture with lots of trees and bushy grass
[QUOTE=HAKKAR!!!;51379896]I noticed both photos they used have very flat skylines, i'm wondering how it would go with a nature picture with lots of trees and bushy grass[/QUOTE]
Well it's automated and they'd want to show it off at it's best so probably not very well. It might be decent, but I can't imagine it working anywhere as well as it did in these examples. At its core it's probably just using color/hue/contrast/edges/etc to determine the sky. It's a nice addition to photoshop and it's presumably optimized specifically for skies, but it's most likely based on methods that have been used for a while to quickly replace skies dynamically in video compositing and the such
I saw a similar technology ages ago in a computer vision lecture video. If someone can find it, please post it.
[QUOTE=Pw0nageXD;51379918]Well it's automated and they'd want to show it off at it's best so probably not very well. It might be decent, but I can't imagine it working anywhere as well as it did in these examples. At its core it's probably just using color/hue/contrast/edges/etc to determine the sky. It's a nice addition to photoshop and it's presumably optimized specifically for skies, but it's most likely based on methods that have been used for a while to quickly replace skies dynamically in video compositing and the such[/QUOTE]
they claim its using machine learning though
someone needs to tell her to stop clapping, or someone has to turn her mic off during the talk
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
