Interesting example and a gruesome autopsy.
Youtube comments. :eng99:
Too bad the evidence implies and does not prove.
It's a really good example though. These are the things that make evolutionists reject the idea of a designer. I do find it strange that the giraffe hasn't been dissected for such a long time.
Great video.
Haven't they already proved evolution like, 10,000 times before this?
[QUOTE=ChristopherB;25781448]Interesting example and a gruesome autopsy.
Youtube comments. :eng99:[/QUOTE]
Don't worry, no one ever looks there for a good answer anyway. And never do it on these videos. Too much trolling and shit
[QUOTE=FPtje;25781629] I do find it strange that the giraffe hasn't been dissected for such a long time.[/QUOTE]
I think they meant they haven't followed the Laryngeal nerve on a giraffe in so long. Maybe it's just because it a difficult task, and doesn't have much use apart from saying "Yep, it's still there, and still just as long."
[QUOTE=DSG;25781713]Haven't they already proved evolution like, 10,000 times before this?[/QUOTE]
Yeah but the model always needs expanding. That's the point of science.
Dawkins Ruthlessly Butchers Defenseless Giraffe: Clearly An Agent of Satan
[editline]1st November 2010[/editline]
:foxnews:
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
