Trey Gowdy ass blasts James Comey on Hillary Clinton's emails
13 replies, posted
[video=youtube;eCif-W02hfQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCif-W02hfQ[/video]
sorry to all of those expecting a porno
[editline]11th December 2016[/editline]
Comey then gets fingerblasted
[video=youtube;fA5oi4N9_nE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fA5oi4N9_nE[/video]
why do you keep posting a trump propaganda channel that takes very short clips out of context
[QUOTE=KillRay;51516332]why do you keep posting a trump propaganda channel that takes very short clips out of context[/QUOTE]
That's a bold claim
[QUOTE=dimitrik129;51516345]That's a bold claim[/QUOTE]
i dont think it is at all. i just want to know what your goal is by posting these from this channel. especially since the last one, the hillary economics one, was really bad and showed how misinformed you and the video creator was
[QUOTE=KillRay;51516352]i dont think it is at all. i just want to know what your goal is by posting these from this channel. especially since the last one, the hillary economics one, was really bad and showed how misinformed you and the video creator was[/QUOTE]
Start a discussion...? The last one did, I learned a lot.
I am failing to see how one video bad video would suddenly qualify the channel to be Trump propaganda. Why is it necessary to attack me?
[QUOTE=dimitrik129;51516355]Start a discussion...? The last one did, I learned a lot.
I am failing to see how one video bad video would suddenly qualify the channel to be Trump propaganda. Why is it necessary to attack me?[/QUOTE]
No, looking at the channel, which i did last time, the purpose of it is clear. a lot of cherry picked small snippets. im sure you could start discussion with full videos of these events.
[editline]12th December 2016[/editline]
I'll withdraw trump propaganda though. Seeing the brexit videos and twitter, I'll say it's a pretty far right channel, and aggressively so. Which is hardly better.
Propaganda or not, this content is laaaate and stale.
Utterly hilarious that people consider a Congressional hearing as "propaganda." And the edits are clearly not maliciously construing contexts.
Video is old, but it tells me alot of how abhorrent some people will feel on here to even see the most cordial of counter-points to their narrative.
[editline]12th December 2016[/editline]
[QUOTE=KillRay;51516332]why do you keep posting a trump propaganda channel that takes very short clips out of context[/QUOTE]
7-8 min clips are too short?
I'm sure you would love to watch the full congressional hearing instead and provide actual counter points instead of bitching about length.
[QUOTE=Tudd;51516689]Utterly hilarious that people consider a Congressional hearing as "propaganda." [B]And the edits are clearly not maliciously construing contexts.
[/B]
Video is old, but it tells me alot of how abhorrent some people will feel on here to even see the most cordial of counter-points to their narrative.
[/QUOTE]
You sure about that? What even makes you say that. A lot of context for either scene is removed, he just cut out the parts exactly people like you will eat up, since you don't need to know the rest I guess. The question that even starts the 2nd video is cut. The fact that both of these take place from the same meeting, but are cut into 2 different videos tells me its an easy way to just hide out a lot of things that might just be important huh
A congressional hearing can become propaganda if you edit it just right
[quote]
7-8 min clips are too short?
I'm sure you would love to watch the full congressional hearing instead and provide actual counter points instead of bitching about length.[/quote]
im talking about the entire channel, hence the words "keep posting" and "channel", meaning its more than just this video. a good example being the last thread of a video posted from this channel. i know youre not smart enough to gauge that yourself so ill let you know
[editline]12th December 2016[/editline]
But you know what, yeah actually just post the whole fucking thing next time and leave time stamps. If you want a discussion, post the whole thing so people can judge for themselves. Cherry picked clips does not start proper discussion of an entire fucking congressional hearing
It's editorialized clips (With fucking music at the end), with clickbait titles. If you cared in any way about transparency you would find the full video and post it. But thus far, this is even worse than anything CNN would pull. You don't give two fucks about having a discussion, you've set your mind and you believe everyone else's view must fit yours.
This plays great before the election but now we don't care.
I love how desperate how the FP trump supporters are, this really hit a new level of desperate.
Even after Trump's win, his supporters still try to slander Hillary. It's sad. Even after the man they wanted to win said he doesn't care about it.
Dimitrik it's great that you are politically involved and I respect your views, I also am very mad at Clintons misdeeds. But if you want to be taken seriously on this forum:
-Make your own longer edit's that give more context and less effects, the 1791L YouTube channel is notorious for editorializing and exaggerating.
-Do not use the NSFW icon. It is childish in the same way the video titles are.
-Do not add your own commentary. You speak like someone that would comment on these videos, and if the videos are really all that great they should stand on their own.
-Keep it topical, old news is over and done with and we all know what went down.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.