What was the funny thing about this and what did happen? All I saw was cars driving
[QUOTE=Icejjfish;45043441]What was the funny thing about this and what did happen? All I saw was cars driving[/QUOTE]
This guy was driving behind an undercover cop. After a few seconds the undercover cop gets bypassed by the two cars and decides to stop them. Is it really not that obvious?
Whenever I get a car, I'll install a dashcam on it.
If there's one thing we can all learn from Russia, it's that dashcams are great.
The guy with the camera looked like he was going to try and undertake the police car on the hard shoulder. Maybe he was swerving for the cars overtaking though.
The song the driver is listening to, if anyone's wondering.
[video=youtube;YHlzj2DLInA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHlzj2DLInA[/video]
[QUOTE=karpik232;45043656]This guy was driving behind an undercover cop. After a few seconds the undercover cop gets bypassed by the two cars and decides to stop them. Is it really not that obvious?[/QUOTE]
tbh I didn't notice it because I was focusing on the cop's car but I see it now that you've pointed it out.
For anyone who still doesn't notice it, it's at the 0:40 second mark.
The music was perfect
I hate how cops are allowed to just drive around and get people like this undercover. I mean yes it is efficient but just doesn't seem fair, I want to see them before they see me.
[QUOTE=Buck.;45045930]I hate how cops are allowed to just drive around and get people like this undercover. I mean yes it is efficient but just doesn't seem fair, I want to see them before they see me.[/QUOTE]
Why should people get a fair shot at breaking the law? I think unmarked (not undercover...) cars are sort of a passive deterrant for drivers. They know that the cops are out there, so they shouldn't speed. People will usually slow down when they see a marked car, but then just speed back up when they don't see one.
[QUOTE=Buck.;45045930]I hate how cops are allowed to just drive around and get people like this undercover. I mean yes it is efficient but just doesn't seem fair, I want to see them before they see me.[/QUOTE]
That doesn't justify breaking the law in the first place.
They had to have not been paying attention at all, anyone could tell it was a cop due to the big fucking aerial on the trunk.
[QUOTE=Buck.;45045930]I hate how cops are allowed to just drive around and get people like this undercover. I mean yes it is efficient but just doesn't seem fair, I want to see them before they see me.[/QUOTE]
you're dumb. life isn't fair. deal with it.
Had they waited another 10 seconds the pass would have been legal too.... tsk tsk.
[editline]9th June 2014[/editline]
[QUOTE=Leo Leonardo;45047237]They had to have not been paying attention at all, anyone could tell it was a cop due to the big fucking aerial on the trunk.[/QUOTE]
This is the only issue with unmarked cars - how do you really know it's a cop? Here in America they actually tell you to call 911 and verify that you're being pulled over, since anyone can buy a police interceptor crown vic and slap a few aerials on it and shit. This is why most unmarked cars don't actually perform traffic stops and are primarily used for investigative or other legal/standardized police functions. They often call the blues out to take care of this kinda stuff after they see it.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
