• No radiation Detected from North Korean Nuclear Test
    34 replies, posted
[quote] South Korean experts say they have not detected any radioactive isotopes from North Korea's nuclear test, hampering efforts to assess the device. Eight samples had been analysed but nothing found, the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission said. Finding certain isotopes - xenon gases in particular - would help experts determine whether a plutonium or uranium-based device was used. But a well-contained test could yield no radioactive isotopes, experts say. [/quote] [url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-21455080]Article (BBC)[/url]
Maybe NK just doesn't know what Uranium or Isotopes are? v:v:v
[QUOTE=GlebGuy;39636223]Maybe NK just doesn't know what Uranium or Isotopes are? v:v:v[/QUOTE] Or maybe they've gotten better at carrying out tests.
[QUOTE=GlebGuy;39636223]Maybe NK just doesn't know what Uranium or Isotopes are? v:v:v[/QUOTE] It definitely does. We're just not sure if NK has created uranium bombs yet. Which would be bad.
Maybe NK fails so much that they just used a really, really, really, really, big bomb?
yeah, there's been a conspiracy theory for a while that NK hasn't even made a single nuke, they just acquire a shitload of TNT/RDX and explode it under the guise of being a nuke test to scare everyone [editline]18th February 2013[/editline] past tests also showed no trace ammounts of xenon
Tonnes and tonnes of dynamite. Nuke Nk style
Well, NK has a shitload of coal (Only reason China maintains a shred of relations), and you can make toluene from that.
[QUOTE=Aurora93;39636376]yeah, there's been a conspiracy theory for a while that NK hasn't even made a single nuke, they just acquire a shitload of TNT/RDX and explode it under the guise of being a nuke test to scare everyone [editline]18th February 2013[/editline] past tests also showed no trace ammounts of xenon[/QUOTE] The 2006 test showed nuclear signs though
[QUOTE=scout1;39636433]The 2006 test showed nuclear signs though[/QUOTE] the '09 one didn't though
So NK is the equivalent of the kid that stuffs his pants with a sock to make his dick look big?
[QUOTE=Aurora93;39636453]the '09 one didn't though[/QUOTE] well if they blew (most of) a nuke in 2006 I think it's safe to say that 2009 could've been a nuke too, you know considering they had 3 years
Maybe they just have advanced past us so much their nukes don't have radioactive material...
[QUOTE=Duplolas;39636509]Maybe they just have advanced past us so much their nukes don't have radioactive material...[/QUOTE] Well that's not a very effective nuke for killing people....
[QUOTE=Duplolas;39636509]Maybe they just have advanced past us so much their nukes don't have radioactive material...[/QUOTE] nuclear radioactive You see, when something is radioactive, its nuclear isotope fuck it why am I trying to explain this
We're gonna find out it was just a water balloon. [editline]18th February 2013[/editline] Tied to a bottle rocket.
I'm sure their nukes and nuke disposal mechanisms will be much better once they upgrade to Lego Mindstorms.
maybe they just have a really deep concrete-lead lined testing area? or does radiation still pass through that as-well? maybe they stored all their farts and lit them up in one go.
[QUOTE=Moustacheman;39636970]Were gonna find out it was just a water balloon. [editline]18th February 2013[/editline] Tied to a bottle rocket.[/QUOTE] super advanced baby-killing top of the line north korean artillery IN ACTION [video=youtube;fpDT8677Z_U]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpDT8677Z_U[/video]
I wonder if NKs internet experts would be reading this thread.. Jesus they'd get pissed. Lol NK you try dawg.. you try.
It's a bluff
[QUOTE=SexualShark;39636346]Maybe NK fails so much that they just used a really, really, really, really, big bomb?[/QUOTE] Well that just shows they have no fucking idea what a nuke is we should pretend to be scared just to mess with them regardless.
[video=youtube;bESGLojNYSo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bESGLojNYSo[/video] New North Korean national anthem.
[QUOTE=NoDachi;39636231]Or maybe they've gotten better at carrying out tests.[/QUOTE] Or maybe the just blew up big pile of TNT and claimed that it was nuclear test? :v:
Actually, the Dear Leader invented a new, more powerful form of radiation that dissipates quickly and is made strong with the pride of the nation!
[QUOTE=NoDachi;39636231]Or maybe they've gotten better at carrying out tests.[/QUOTE] Or maybe there was no nuke at all...
[QUOTE=Aurora93;39636453]the '09 one didn't though[/QUOTE] Could be that they got better at containing it, I don't think isotopes are [I]meant[/I] to leak out of a well controlled nuclear test.
Best Korea develops new environmentally friendly nuclear bomb.
[QUOTE=Wealth + Taste;39637022]super advanced baby-killing top of the line north korean artillery IN ACTION [video=youtube;fpDT8677Z_U]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpDT8677Z_U[/video][/QUOTE] You just made my whole entire week. That's fucking [i]great[/i]!
[QUOTE=SexualShark;39636346]Maybe NK fails so much that they just used a really, really, really, really, big bomb?[/QUOTE] Or it's just well-contained.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.