Trump on porn actress who accused him of misconduct: 'Oh, I'm sure she's never been grabbed before'

[Bathtub]

[url]http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/24/politics/trump-on-latest-accusations/index.html[/url]

[QUOTE]Donald Trump on Monday addressed the latest accusations of inappropriate sexual contact made against him, saying of the accuser, an adult film performer, "Oh, I'm sure she's never been grabbed before."

At a news conference Saturday, Jessica Drake accused Trump of grabbing and kissing her without permission and offering her money to go up to his hotel room alone a decade ago.[/QUOTE]

You can't make this shit up.

[New Cidem]

The race to the bottom continues

[ROFLBURGER]

At this point I'm just in denial that a major candidate is saying these things.

Even though I'm a Clinton Supporter, every time I see news of Trump saying stupid shit like this I instantly come to the conclusion "Ah this is probably sensationalized"

NOPE

[Sgt. Napalm]

"You know she had sex on camera once so it's okay to touch her wherever I please."

God dammit.

[Maegord]

[QUOTE=New Cidem;51255275]The race to the bottom continues[/QUOTE]

I always hate this notion since it's just Trump flinging shit everywhere, and everyone tries to blame it equally on both sides.

[Netsui]

[QUOTE=Cructo;51255298]But he's saying he didn't touch her but I guess you didn't bother reading the next few lines in the article[/QUOTE]

oh, i'm sure he's never grabbed anyone before

[bitches]

[QUOTE=Cructo;51255298]But he's saying he didn't touch her but I guess you didn't bother reading the next few lines in the article[/QUOTE]

He did defend the [I]idea[/I] of groping her without consent, under the justification that it wouldn't matter merely because she works in pornography.

Why should I believe him after that?

[Sgt. Napalm]

[QUOTE=Cructo;51255298]But he's saying he didn't touch her but I guess you didn't bother reading the next few lines in the article[/QUOTE]

This is some OJ "If I Did It"-tier shit.

[Corn]

So he basically admits that he sexually harassed a woman now?

[Steel]

I'm feel bad for his campaign sometimes, they just can't keep him quiet.

[Mr. Scorpio]

[QUOTE=Cructo;51255298]But he's saying he didn't touch her but I guess you didn't bother reading the next few lines in the article[/QUOTE]

"I'm not guilty, but even if I was they totally deserved it."

[New Cidem]

[QUOTE=Maegord;51255303]I always hate this notion since it's just Trump flinging shit everywhere, and everyone tries to blame it equally on both sides.[/QUOTE]

By "race" I mostly mean a one-man marathon. It was likely Trump's New Years resolution; to see how fast he could throw a presidential election, his reputation, and his business into the toilet

[Doctor Smiles]

[QUOTE=Gwoodman;51255304]oh, i'm sure he's never grabbed anyone before[/QUOTE]

Certainly never grabbed them by the pussy or anything. Nope. Never happened.

[SupaBastad]

[QUOTE=Cructo;51255298]But he's saying he didn't touch her but I guess you didn't bother reading the next few lines in the article[/QUOTE]

He's implying that, if he did grab her, she shouldn't complain because she's used to being grabbed which then implies that because of her profession or because she's a woman that she is used to it/should expect it and has no place raising accusations or complaints about it.

The man uses caveman language so it's not hard to see exactly what he's getting at and you're in another universe if you can't see how that statement can be perceived this way.

[editline]24th October 2016[/editline]

[QUOTE=Cructo;51255319]you don't have to believe him tbh but claims without any proof are not very strong

[editline]24th October 2016[/editline]

people are usually supposed to be considered innocent until proven guilty [B]unless they are running for president i guess[/B]

and are republican candidates[/QUOTE]

Unless audio of them talking about being controlling towards women and disturbing personal boundaries comes out. Which it did.

[bitches]

[QUOTE=Cructo;51255319]you don't have to believe him tbh but claims without any proof are not very strong

[editline]24th October 2016[/editline]

people are usually supposed to be considered innocent until proven guilty unless they are running for president i guess

and are republican candidates[/QUOTE]

Good strawman. We're allowed to have opinions on whether we think he did it or not, and of course that isn't the same thing as saying that he should face punishment without proof.

My opinion is that he's quite literally supporting the molesting of this women, and has been of women in general for years, thus I'm inclined to believe the accuser.

[Source]

Trumps gonna smash records at this rate......just not the records he wanted.

[TheHydra]

[QUOTE=Cructo;51255319]you don't have to believe him tbh but claims without any proof are not very strong

[editline]24th October 2016[/editline]

[B]people are usually supposed to be considered innocent until proven guilty unless they are running for president i guess
[/B]
and are republican candidates[/QUOTE]

fucking hilarious coming from a trump supporter

[Swilly]

Fuck off ya spray tanned mutant Oompa Loompa with a cheap toupe made of armpit hair.

[Zao Medong]

hey garry

[editline]24th October 2016[/editline]

fuck you

[highlight](User was permabanned for this post ("Wants to be banned" - Craptasket))[/highlight]

[ROFLBURGER]

[QUOTE=Cructo;51255319]you don't have to believe him tbh but claims without any proof are not very strong

[editline]24th October 2016[/editline]

people are usually supposed to be considered innocent until proven guilty unless they are running for president i guess

and are republican candidates[/QUOTE]

People aren't shitting on trump because of how many women have accused him of sexual assault.
People are shitting on trump because of how he's responding to these allegations.

[Gogeta SS4]

[QUOTE=Cructo;51255298]But he's saying he didn't touch her but I guess you didn't bother reading the next few lines in the article[/QUOTE]

This thread is about Trump's response to the accusation.
The post you quoted is referring to said response.

Do you honestly believe that it's appropriate for presidential candidates to rebate accusations of sexual abuse, false or otherwise, with, essentially, "she deserved it"? Can you answer this question without a strawman about persecuted conservatives?

[Smartlord]

[QUOTE=Cructo;51255319]you don't have to believe him tbh but claims without any proof are not very strong

[editline]24th October 2016[/editline]

people are usually supposed to be considered innocent until proven guilty unless they are running for president i guess

and are republican candidates[/QUOTE]

Okay let's drop the talk of Clinton's emails, Benghazi, and Clinton Foundation allegations then as they haven't been proven in a court of law. Is that okay?

[Maveraux]

Its sort of unreal a presidential candidate is saying shit like this. As a foreigner I sort of check in on the election updates every now and then like "Oh yeah this is ACTUALLY happening"

[Rixxz2]

[QUOTE=Cructo;51255319]you don't have to believe him tbh but claims without any proof are not very strong

[editline]24th October 2016[/editline]

people are usually supposed to be considered innocent until proven guilty unless they are running for president i guess

and are republican candidates[/QUOTE]

Nobody's claiming that's evidence for him sexually harassing someone, what it does prove is that he's a scumbag with shitty views, as if there wasn't already truckloads of evidence pointing towards that

[MightyLOLZOR]

They really won't let this sexual harassment thing go will they? Let's just ignore Clinton's war crimes.

[Missing User]

[QUOTE=MightyLOLZOR;51259717]They really won't let this sexual harassment thing go will they? Let's just ignore Clinton's war crimes.[/QUOTE]
"the media should only point out the flaws of candidates i dislike!!!!!!"

[sir whoopsalot]

[quote]it's not my thing to do what they say. You know I don't do that. I don't grab them, as they say, on the arm."[/quote]

The joke I can make here is such low-hanging fruit, it occasionally chills with potatoes.

[Sharo]

[QUOTE=MightyLOLZOR;51259717]They really won't let this sexual harassment thing go will they? Let's just ignore Clinton's war crimes.[/QUOTE]

Did you listen to the audio? A guy asks Trump [I]"don't you think maybe you should not talk all this shit, giving the accusations attention?"[/I] and he responds with [I]"maybe yes but I'm gonna do it anyway because I want to"[/I], and you're talking about why "they" won't let it go?

[SirJon]

[QUOTE=Maegord;51255303]I always hate this notion since it's just Trump flinging shit everywhere, and everyone tries to blame it equally on both sides.[/QUOTE]

Clinton does it without trying

[hexpunK]

[QUOTE=MightyLOLZOR;51259717]They really won't let this sexual harassment thing go will they? Let's just ignore Clinton's war crimes.[/QUOTE]

Her "war crimes" that have...what proof again? Has she ordered the firebombing of orphanages in Syria or did I miss that? Has she personally instructed soldiers to shoot surrendering combatants or what?

People are talking about this shit because [I]there is hard evidence from the orange buffoon himself implicating him[/I]. He literally cannot shut his mouth for long enough to prevent some kind of PR catastrophe. And this man is running for the highest seat of power in your country.

Clinton is a fucking saint compared to some of the shit Trump has said and done. But being a private businessman he can hide it behind defamation lawsuits (which he has almost infinite resources to throw at, unlike the accused) and his companies rather than taking the blame himself. Clinton is a public servant, shit she says and does as a part of her role is going to be recorded somewhere.

And yet despite this the Republican party still can't pin Benghazi on her, despite trying at least seven times now with Republican-led investigations. Almost as if she's pretty likely not a criminal, huh. Someone, somewhere would have actually been able to convict her of something by this point if she was as bad as you guys make out.