• Woman gets £27,000 a year in benefits,"claims that she is 'super-fertile'"
    51 replies, posted
[url]http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2441291/Arrogance-jobless-Kent-mother-27k-year-benefits-believes-working-mugs-game.html[/url] Look at that mess [img]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/10/02/article-2441291-1AD5C0BC000005DC-721_634x421.jpg[/img] New avatar anyone? [img]http://i.imgur.com/RF6GqkX.jpg[/img]
The Family that Meth Made
Is that Skinny Pete? [t]http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20130130055806/breakingbad/images/a/af/Skinny-pete.jpg[/t]
[quote]Now Mrs Flisher, who claims that she is 'super-fertile' [B]which makes contraception impossible[/B], has gloated shamelessly on the internet about 'haters' who criticise her state-subsidised life.[/quote] What.
Christ, get your tubes tied then
so how about the guy get a vasectomy or something
That's more than my parents get [I]together[/I] People like this is why there's a stigma against benefit claimants
I'm sorry for the kids..
This article is pure propaganda. Like most stuff from daily mail.
Her face is a pretty good contraceptive
So, how long until TLC offers them a TV show?
[QUOTE=JgcxCub;42381642]This article is pure propaganda. Like most stuff from daily mail.[/QUOTE] To be fair, they were on Daybreak about two months ago and explained how they needed a new home because "Things are too difficult". Stupid cow. [editline]2nd October 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=garry;42381684]Her face is a pretty good contraceptive[/QUOTE] God has posted I see
[QUOTE=JgcxCub;42381642]This article is pure propaganda. Like most stuff from daily mail.[/QUOTE] I'm surprised nobody has really tried to get the mail to stop printing this shit, it's inciting hostility towards people on benefits. They also print very similar shit about disabled people being "Scroungers" and "work-shy" which are some of the most appalling things I have even seen printed.
[QUOTE=garry;42381684]Her face is a pretty good contraceptive[/QUOTE] i'm sure you rarely look at the mirror
[QUOTE=Genericenemy;42381731]I'm surprised nobody has really tried to get the mail to stop printing this shit,[B] it's inciting hostility towards people on benefits[/B]. They also print very similar shit about disabled people being "Scroungers" and "work-shy" which are some of the most appalling things I have even seen printed.[/QUOTE] That is [I]exactly[/I] what they are trying to do. Inciting hatred is a potent weapon.
[quote]Now Mrs Flisher, who claims that she is 'super-fertile' which makes contraception impossible, has gloated shamelessly on the internet about 'haters' who criticise her state-subsidised life.[/quote] um...so lets assume this is real for the sake of argument....biologically speaking how does this negate the effectiveness of condoms, spermicides, morning after pills, and....getting a vascetamy/tubestied
All her kids look exactly alike; what the fuck?! Stop her from spawning more of them.
This is the reason so many want the benefits system shaken up. Everyone knows the Daily Fail's agenda and they stir this up, but we also know that there a quite a few cases like this. Working in a supermarket for 40 hours a week will earn you about £13,500. That's not enough to have a mortgage accepted, while this is going on. [editline]2nd October 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=UberMunchkin;42381919]Generally the mail only reports on the people who live on benefits when they have a case study of those with a negative attitude towards working. Just take this example: We can all agree that *that* is an extremely negative attitude towards working, and in a sense it shouldn't really be tolerated. However the article itself is an extremely biased and negative portrayal of working class families, many people who are on benefits are actively seeking a job, but aren't being hired.[/QUOTE] I would argue that the working class doesn't exist, and that families like this are more a dropoff from the middle class which are very much dominant in the UK. Work or be like this in other words.
we should just sterilize all those we don't want having children! ... hold on whats that called again??
People should be less concerned about one example of a welfare abuser and more concerned that the Daily Mail is using a propaganda piece to discredit a system that helps millions of people be able to fucking live.
At first i'm thinking; Well it's better than the citizen's tax money going towards warheads and M16A4's to wage war off in some foreign country. But then I read her statement: [quote]'Why work when I can legally take your hard-earned money and you can't say shit to me?' [/quote] Oh, and this... [quote] "...Mrs Flisher, who says depression prevents her from getting a job" [/QUOTE] Put those children in foster care, revoke her benefits. They'll lead happier lives in new homes and so will society. Anyone who gloats like that, don't care in what tone, ain't worth the goods they're holding.
[QUOTE=Memobot;42383511]This is the reason so many want the benefits system shaken up. Everyone knows the Daily Fail's agenda and they stir this up, but we also know that there a quite a few cases like this. Working in a supermarket for 40 hours a week will earn you about £13,500. That's not enough to have a mortgage accepted, while this is going on. [editline]2nd October 2013[/editline] I would argue that the working class doesn't exist, and that families like this are more a dropoff from the middle class which are very much dominant in the UK. Work or be like this in other words.[/QUOTE] I'm sure it's even less than that if you work in a supermarket, my girlfriend works a lot more than 40 hours per week, gets night and sunday premiums and still only makes around 1000 per month after tax.
[QUOTE=garry;42381684]Her face is a pretty good contraceptive[/QUOTE] Evidently not for meth addicts...
I wonder what kind of life they lead with that 27k though, i mean yeah okay house and such but it doesn't look like they're living the dream, no shiny car no picket fence and all that... that many children can't be cheap to feed, they probably won't have any cool toys i might guess, can only speculate really...
why is it ok in this day and age to have a news story about a "super fertile" meth addicted female? I mean, she not "super fertile", shes just "fertile" like any woman who has a healthy reproductive system. Essentially what this story really is about is a woman who has too much unprotected sex and is jobless living on government funds. Lets make a spectacle out of it, shall we?
[QUOTE]What a disgusting family, never worked and breeding for more cash. The government is to blame for this as they just keep on paying more for each child born. The solution is to cap benefits at 2 children and then it is up to the families to decide if they can afford more like people in work do. [/QUOTE] This comment is pretty brilliant, especially considering that its the Dailymail.
Daily Mail, the news website that hates Britain.
[Quote]Now Mrs Flisher, who claims that she is 'super-fertile' which makes contraception impossible, has gloated shamelessly on the internet about 'haters' who criticise her state-subsidised life.[/quote] Like, is this an actual thing? Birth control is free in the UK and very easy accessible, even to someone like this person. I read through the article and her personality seems disgusting and I wouldn't be surprised if she lacked proper sex education.
The article says they only got the bigger house this last month, while the oldest kid is years old. This means they've been crammed in a small home for years. People are trying to make it sound as if they've been moving to larger and larger homes as their have more kids. I bet it's been them living in squalor until now. That would help explain her eagerness to brag, she's probably so excited by this she can't shut up about it. Not that what they are doing is right, but it's not as easy living as some are making it out to be.
[QUOTE=Laputa;42381637]That's more than my parents get [I]together[/I] People like this is why there's a stigma against benefit claimants[/QUOTE] There are always bad apples. But the media really tries to make it look like the majority of people on welfare are like this. They try to set the public on each other to divert from real issues.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.