Jill Stein: Uproar over Moscow dinner photo is Democrats 'looking for someone to blame' - Polidicks

[QUOTE]The Green Party's Jill Stein says a recent spike in interest about a photo of her having dinner with Russian President Vladimir Putin can be traced to Democrats "looking for someone to blame" for their election struggles.[/QUOTE] [URL="http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/jill-stein-uproar-over-moscow-dinner-photo-is-democrats-looking-for-someone-to-blame/article/2626995"]http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/jill-stein-uproar-over-moscow-dinner-photo-is-democrats-looking-for-someone-to-blame/article/2626995[/URL] More say this becoming clearly true that she right that there just lazily blame third parties than people who didn't even vote Hillary. And more apparently Democrat Facepunchers are just so still butthurt as Republican Facepunchers accusing her as Fraud. [QUOTE]Our criteria are that a source must have a bias rating no farther than Center Left or [B]Center Right[/B] and that it must have a High rate of factual reporting. This not only eliminates propaganda rags like Breitbart outright, but pretty neatly trims out some of the more extreme main stream sources like Fox News and Huffington Post. If your source isn't listed on this website, use your best judgment. Look at other articles on your source's site to see if an obvious trend emerges, check the "About Us" section for potential agendas or backing, or do some searches on the source in Google to try to attempt to verify its reliability.[/QUOTE] [t]http://i.imgur.com/Rrqj5uj.png[/t] [URL="https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/washington-examiner/"]https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/washington-examiner/[/URL]

This sounds more like Jill Stein desperately trying to stay relevant.

Jill Stein who?

Honestly I wouldn't be surprised if she was in on Russian election meddling herself, intentionally placed to be a Spoiler to boost Trump's chances. Lock Her Up.

[QUOTE=certified;52399844]Honestly I wouldn't be surprised if she was in on Russian election meddling herself, intentionally placed to be a Spoiler to boost Trump's chances. Lock Her Up.[/QUOTE] Wow, the Russians planted her in the previous election too, 4 years before Donald Trump even announced he was running (and probably before he even knew) just so it wouldn't seem suspicious. They're really playing the long con.

[QUOTE=certified;52399844]Honestly I wouldn't be surprised if she was in on Russian election meddling herself, intentionally placed to be a Spoiler to boost Trump's chances. Lock Her Up.[/QUOTE] You're not serious are you? The Green Party exists and has candidates every election, and Stein barely even broke 1% nationally; at this point you may as well say that Ralph Nader was placed to guarantee a GWB win in 2000. I'm registered Green but didn't vote Green, please don't handwave my party's efforts (as much as I may disagree with some of them) away as a result of Russian meddling.

[QUOTE=certified;52399844]Honestly I wouldn't be surprised if she was in on Russian election meddling herself, intentionally placed to be a Spoiler to boost Trump's chances. Lock Her Up.[/QUOTE] If she was in on the Russian election meddling, then Putin is dumber than he looks. I wouldn't trust Jill Stein to have the political power to sway a dog catcher election.

[QUOTE=Flicky;52399952]You're not serious are you? The Green Party exists and has candidates every election, and Stein barely even broke 1% nationally; at this point you may as well say that Ralph Nader was placed to guarantee a GWB win in 2000. I'm registered Green but didn't vote Green, please don't handwave my party's efforts (as much as I may disagree with some of them) away as a result of Russian meddling.[/QUOTE] Sadly yea they [I]are bloody insanity serious[/I] about this and they just irrationally hate American Green Party or any American third party that matter because they raised/self-raised as be [I'm going said] stereotypical Democrats without advanced Political Education besides two major parties. And surprisedly however she did broke 1% by mere 1.07% according to from Wikipedia. [URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2016#Results"]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2016#Results[/URL]

If it turns out she is. Bye Bye any third party. Edit: there is suspicious evidence she has Russian ties otherwise though.

[QUOTE=Popularvote;52399618]This sounds more like Jill Stein desperately trying to stay relevant.[/QUOTE] If she really cares to be relevant again. She would rather move on (she seemly trying to as I look her twitter/facebook accounts) from the last election and currently, she preaching of getting new party members without Anti-Stein trolls keep attacking her with keep posting the same RT photo from two years go as acting like some sh@tty stalking conspiracy theorists. But ones ironically forced her to be relevant again are Big know Democratic Party pundits (like one she debating there), Corporate-based Mainstream Media who possibly part of Democratic Establishment and usually Democrat Anti-Stein trolls.

Let's not accuse anyone of Russia connections unless there is clear evidence