Consciousness is god. Existence is god. Not a man in a white robe. We are all bound by the same energy in an infinite multiverse with every reality existing at the same time. All of those realities, infinity, is god. God is omnipresent because he (I say "he" for ease of understanding, in reality you are a part of god and "he" is not separate from "you") is existence. There is no existence without energy (God).
When you die you will return as being energy, which cannot be destroyed, nor created (E=MC2... All of matter is energy), for you have always existed as a part of God. God is science but is also in a way religion.
You will never cease to exist, maybe this reality is just an illusion from one consciousness which we all come from. I do not believe consciousness is only a thing in physical minds, yet all of energy contains infinite knowledge. Think of it like the universe as a brain, with infinite neurons firing at the same time. This is the energy that holds us, the main consciousness.
Take that as you will.. It is only my opinion and people are free to believe what they choose!
I also thought of this concept in a 3d graphics sense. The same concept except everything that exists exists within a matrix. If you know programming, it's just a set of values. The matrix is the fabric of reality, which allows us to exist. The 3 dimensional space (even though it is many more than 3 dimensions) is "God".
I don't like to mix science with religion, because then all you end up with is science, and apparently that's no fun for anyone :v:
[QUOTE=zach1193;46246042]I don't like to mix science with religion, because then all you end up with is science, and apparently that's no fun for anyone :v:[/QUOTE]
I mean most of the things here scientists even argue about. The existence of a multiverse for example.
I don't think "God" is a personality, just the fabric that allows us to exist. I believe consciousness plays a huge role in us existing, as you can see with quantum physics and things being observed, and changing states when things are observed.
So maybe we are just a branch of the universal consciousness / energy. But no scientist could argue that we are not bound by one energy -- in fact, that's what they are trying to prove at CERN right now.
If you want to call existence god, then sure, but why not just call it existence? We have a word for it already.
How does "There is no existence without energy" imply "god"?
"You will never cease to exist,..."
As far as science is concerned, your consciousness is a function of your physical brain. If you don't believe that, then do you have any evidence for this belief?
That would be very interesting, and if you really have evidence you probably could revolutionize biology. What implications of this understanding could be tested/have been tested?
"I also thought of this concept in a 3d graphics sense."
Again, you list a way of explaining something, and then call it "god". Why not just call it the thing?
When we use language in such a way it depreciates the value of individual words. I insist we use the word "god" to mean what it does to most people.
Mixing science and religion is basically mixing things that we've learned to be pretty much objectively true through careful experimentation and examination, with wishful ideas and primitive ways of thinking.
I say we should stop caring what religion has to say about objective reality until it actually provides evidence that any of it is true. Trying to retroactively fit your religion into science sounds like confirmation bias.
I'm not here to shoot your argument down, but I would like to understand it. If you could address these then maybe I could see your point of view.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
