• Long Exposure
    26 replies, posted
[B]DONT VIEW THIS AS A THUMBNAIL PLEASE IT LOOKS LIKE SHIT![/B] Taken on October 29th and 30st for a total of 7 hours exposure time. Using the 98 in Hooker telescope, the photo was exposed for a total of 7 hours between the 2 days. A short 3 hour exposure on the 30th and a longer 4 hour exposure on the 31st. You too can view this object at RA: 21h29m58.4s DEC: +12°10m1.8s [B]Or you could just view my deviant art page [url]http://fc07.deviantart.com/fs51/f/2009/304/7/3/Long_Exposure_by_rogelead.png[/url] I know your not going to go there and fav it :([/B] [url]http://rogelead.deviantart.com/art/Long-Exposure-no-thumbnail-142079378[/url] [B]Oh BTW its 6000x3000[/B] [media]http://fc05.deviantart.com/fs51/i/2009/305/2/8/Long_Exposure_no_thumbnail_by_rogelead.png[/media] [img]http://fc05.deviantart.com/fs51/i/2009/305/2/8/Long_Exposure_no_thumbnail_by_rogelead.png[/img]
Things like this confuse me in what category to put it, 2d or photo?
[QUOTE=johanz;18119040]Things like this confuse me in what category to put it, 2d or photo?[/QUOTE] i would put them under both to be safe
Wait this is a real photo? Amazing :D Artistic'd
so you used the telescope at mount wilson to take this?
No way it's a picture... Looks amazing.
Dude.. this is amazing.
This is amazing, I'd say it's neptune or something.
Very nice.
where the hell did you get a hooker telescope? the nearest planetarium? nice pic tho. worth and artistic
The stars are real but the planet is not Looks cool anyway
awesome
[QUOTE=Xerios3;18129697]The stars are real but the planet is not Looks cool anyway[/QUOTE] Your very close
So the planet is real and the stars are not? Can I see the picture unmodified? Like before you edited it?? Also that is awesome.
:o
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messier_15[/url]
I want to see what this looks like unmodified, but it's pretty great.
[QUOTE=gngbng;18136204][url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messier_15[/url][/QUOTE] Yep messier 15 a great location too! :D
[QUOTE=Rougelead;18139692]Yep messier 15 a great location too! :D[/QUOTE] You should show us the picture without any modifying.
As an astronomer, I'm not sure what I'm looking at, I've never seen an extra-solar planet in that much detail. Actually it probably can't be extra-solar AND in that much detail, especially with a ground based telescope [atmospheric distortion]. It's got a dark side so obviously it doesn't produce light, and its orbiting something very bright. It's either a moon [titan?] or one of the 8 [9] planets. Am I close? As an artist [well from an artist's point of view anyway] it looks really pretty.
This isn't going to come out the size i want cause of the forms so ill post a link to view it in the correct size. This is the original picture of the object without the resizing or colour change in the picture above. I must warn about the size however. [B]Paying for internet by the hour? DONT click the last link[/B] [B][url]http://rogelead.deviantart.com/art/Long-Exposure-No-Modification-142303832[/url] [url]http://fc02.deviantart.com/fs51/f/2009/306/d/8/Long_Exposure_No_Modification_by_rogelead.png[/url][/B] [img]http://fc02.deviantart.com/fs51/i/2009/306/4/1/Long_Exposure_No_Modification_by_rogelead.png[/img]
That is just amazing. Nothing more to say really.
That rivals most astronomy pictures that I've seen... and I check the astronomy picture of the day daily. You should e-mail to them or something. [url]http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html[/url]
[QUOTE=Analog;18141544]As an astronomer, I'm not sure what I'm looking at, I've never seen an extra-solar planet in that much detail. Actually it probably can't be extra-solar AND in that much detail, especially with a ground based telescope [atmospheric distortion]. It's got a dark side so obviously it doesn't produce light, and its orbiting something very bright. It's either a moon [titan?] or one of the 8 [9] planets. Am I close? As an artist [well from an artist's point of view anyway] it looks really pretty.[/QUOTE] Yeah, the best extrasolar picture taken shows a planet several times bigger than Jupiter, about a pixel across. Also, the best ground based image of Jupiter ever taken looks like this: [url]http://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/jupiter-580x580.jpg[/url] This is obviously a photoshop, though the stars do look very real in the full size version. I'm guessing a real star exposure shot with a fake planet pasted on top, or a really good photoshop of a starfield with a fake planet pasted on top. Either way, it looks pretty cool.
MY EYES, THEY BURN!!!!!! Because of the awesomeness :v:
Well i have to give you all congratulations! Together you have all figured out the process.
So you didn't actually post the unedited vers
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.