Tory scumbag makes comment on homosexuals, gets suspended from job - Polidicks

Haha, fuck tories. [url]http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/scotland/8647206.stm[/url] [INDENT][INDENT] [IMG]http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/47728000/jpg/_47728119_009065049-1.jpg[/IMG][/INDENT][/INDENT] [QUOTE]Conservative election candidate Philip Lardner has been suspended for describing gay people on his website as "not normal", the party has said. Scottish Conservatives chairman Andrew Fulton described the North Ayrshire and Arran candidate's comments as "deeply offensive and unacceptable". "These views have no place in the modern Conservative party," he said. Mr Lardner was reinstated to the party in 2008 after a previous suspension over claims he made racist comments. The primary school teacher was alleged to have portrayed former leader of white-rule Rhodesia, Ian Smith, as a hero. On that occasion, Mr Lardner did not deny making the comments but suggested they had been taken out of context. His latest suspension was provoked by comments he made on his website. Under the heading "What I believe in", Mr Lardner had written: "Homosexuality is not 'normal behaviour'." The comment has since been removed. Mr Lardner had been challenging Katy Clark's Labour majority of more than 11,000. Other candidates in the seat are Liberal Democrat Gillian Cole-Hamilton, the SNP's Patricia Gibson and Louise McDaid of the Socialist Labour Party. [/QUOTE]

At what point did he think it was a good idea to post that on his website?

[quote=docc;21588125]at what point did he think it was a good idea to post that on his website?[/quote] 1950

Nice one :downs:

What a cock sucker [editline]0[/editline] I mean what level of shit was going through his head writing that in 2010, even if it is his own personal view.

[img]http://distorsion.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/caravaggio-sean-bean3.jpg[/img] Hello 007

If this would have happened on the Internet he would have been trolled to hell, people calling him homo and creating a meme of an angry homo politician.

Sadly, he was right Homosexualism is not normal, not saying it's a really bad disease or all homos should be eradicated or anything but still, it's not natural.

[QUOTE=Razor sharp;21588250]Sadly, he was right Homosexualism is not normal, not saying it's a really bad disease or all homos should be eradicated or anything but still, it's not natural.[/QUOTE] If it wasn't natural, it wouldn't happen.

[QUOTE=Razor sharp;21588250]Sadly, he was right Homosexualism is not normal, not saying it's a really bad disease or all homos should be eradicated or anything but still, it's not natural.[/QUOTE] I'm a scottish angry gay, and if you fucking say that to my fucking face ill rip off your fucking head and take a shit down your fucking throat

[QUOTE=Razor sharp;21588250]Sadly, he was right Homosexualism is not normal, not saying it's a really bad disease or all homos should be eradicated or anything but still, it's not natural.[/QUOTE] no

just another bit of evidence that the tories are out of touch with society.

[QUOTE=Razor sharp;21588250]Sadly, he was right Homosexualism is not normal, not saying it's a really bad disease or all homos should be eradicated or anything but still, it's not natural.[/QUOTE] [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jrh8VVwMI4&playnext_from=TL&videos=uf3M1lM75GQ[/media] You are not natural pal. Anyway, I wonder what kind of storm will follow. [QUOTE=codenamecueball;21588424]I'm a scottish angry gay, and if you fucking say that to my fucking face ill rip off your fucking head and take a shit down your fucking throat[/QUOTE] You can't, because if you are not natural, you don't exist. Too bad.

[QUOTE=Razor sharp;21588250]Sadly, he was right Homosexualism is not normal, not saying it's a really bad disease or all homos should be eradicated or anything but still, it's not natural.[/QUOTE] I dont care if its not normal i'll still suck dick

[QUOTE=Razor sharp;21588250]Sadly, he was right Homosexualism is not normal, not saying it's a really bad disease or all homos should be eradicated or anything but still, it's not natural.[/QUOTE] That's funny because homosexuality is pretty common in nature and animals.

[QUOTE=TH89;21588290]If it wasn't natural, it wouldn't happen.[/QUOTE] Well, evolutionarily, homosexuality is not a good thing. You cannot pass on your genes, which makes your thread die. Of course now, we can get past the gene problem that arises in some, and let them spread their genes. There is no reason to hate them, but they are, in a biological sense, "not normal". This guy, however, means it in a different way. He is calling them "weird" and "bad" when he says it.

[QUOTE=davidofmk771;21588562]Well, evolutionarily, homosexuality is not a good thing. You cannot pass on your genes, which makes your thread die. Of course now, we can get past the gene problem that arises in some, and let them spread their genes. There is no reason to hate them, but they are, in a biological sense, "not normal". This guy, however, means it in a different way. He is calling them "weird" and "bad" when he says it.[/QUOTE] And if I don't have sex and not have kids, I am not normal. And if I use condoms, I am not normal either. Right.

sure it wasn't the BNP? :v:

[QUOTE=Johnnsen;21588589]And if I don't have sex and not have kids, I am not normal. And if I use condoms, I am not normal either. Right.[/QUOTE] In evolution, yes. You are not in the majority. It still goes on, it's natural, it just isn't normal in a sense. Lets say I don't have legs. I have a problem in my genes that causes it. It is natural, but it isn't "normal". I'm all for gay rights and everything. I don't hate gay people.

[QUOTE=Razor sharp;21588250]Sadly, he was right Homosexualism is not normal, not saying it's a really bad disease or all homos should be eradicated or anything but still, it's not natural.[/QUOTE] Homosexuality can be observed all over nature among many species ranging from insects to higher primates.

[QUOTE=davidofmk771;21588562]Well, evolutionarily, homosexuality is not a good thing.[/QUOTE] If it wasn't evolutionarily advantageous, it probably wouldn't be so common in so many species of animal. Just because you can't see an immediate evolutionary advantage to it doesn't mean there isn't one.

I can't help but wonder what niche it would fill then...

[QUOTE=TH89;21588702]If it wasn't evolutionarily advantageous, it probably wouldn't be so common in so many species of animal. Just because you can't see an immediate evolutionary advantage to it doesn't mean there isn't one.[/QUOTE] Related: One theory is that homosexual behavior is one of natures ways of dealing with population control.

[QUOTE=TH89;21588702]If it wasn't evolutionarily advantageous, it probably wouldn't be so common in so many species of animal. Just because you can't see an immediate evolutionary advantage to it doesn't mean there isn't one.[/QUOTE] Well, I do remember hearing of animals doing this to strengthen bonds or because they never found a mate. Also because of a gene problem, if I am right about that.

[QUOTE=davidofmk771;21588654]In evolution, yes. You are not in the majority. It still goes on, it's natural, it just isn't normal in a sense. Lets say I don't have legs. I have a problem in my genes that causes it. It is natural, but it isn't "normal". I'm all for gay rights and everything. I don't hate gay people.[/QUOTE] Thats just discussing if something that happens in the majority is automatically normal or not, that doesn't really have anything to do with gay people. Just because something is in the majority doesn't mean its normal/positive and the other thing is not normal/negative. Thats like saying because most people are *skin color* all the other skin colors aren't normal.

[QUOTE=Johnnsen;21588750]Thats just discussing if something that happens in the majority is automatically normal or not, that doesn't really have anything to do with gay people. Just because something is in the majority doesn't mean its normal and the other thing is not. Thats like saying because most people are *skin color* all the other skin colors aren't normal.[/QUOTE] Well, good point.

[QUOTE=davidofmk771;21588739]Well, I do remember hearing of animals doing this to strengthen bonds or because they never found a mate. Also because of a gene problem, if I am right about that.[/QUOTE] It's not a "gene problem." For one thing, it's malleable, and for another thing, the causes haven't really been determined. It's a contentious subject.

[QUOTE=codenamecueball;21588424]I'm a scottish angry gay, and if you fucking say that to my fucking face ill rip off your fucking head and take a shit down your fucking throat[/QUOTE] Scottish internet tough guy.

[QUOTE=Razor sharp;21588250]Sadly, he was right Homosexualism is not normal, not saying it's a really bad disease or all homos should be eradicated or anything but still, it's not natural.[/QUOTE] I'm not racist but

[QUOTE=TH89;21588822]It's not a "gene problem." For one thing, it's malleable, and for another thing, the causes haven't really been determined. It's a contentious subject.[/QUOTE] Thank you for educating me on this topic. I guess I should look back into what I heard that from.