[url]http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/03/14/senate-committee-ready-to-ok-assault-weapons-ban/[/url]
[quote]
The Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday approved a renewed assault-weapons ban, advancing the measure to the Senate floor where it will face intense resistance from Republicans and other gun-rights supporters.
[/quote]
:facepalm:
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("Inaccurate title" - Starpluck))[/highlight]
Please, Senate.
Eat a dick. No one is going to kill anyone with a M1 Carbine.
Senate Judiciary Committee.
I'm really upset with how cowards like this can get anywhere near places of power.
We all know it's not going anywhere in the Senate, not while the Republicans have more than 40 votes.
[QUOTE=Used Car Salesman;39911547]We all know it's not going anywhere in the Senate, not while the Republicans have more than 40 votes.[/QUOTE]
I doubt democrats would vote for it as well. Voting for gun control is an excellent way not to get re-elected.
Not all dems hate guns too. It won't pass.
But assault weapons aren't even used in the vast majority of crimes. Shotguns are used more. And governmental agencies after the Clinton gun ban went into effect said that it had a negligible impact on firearm crime.
[QUOTE=Raidyr;39911592]But assault weapons aren't even used in the vast majority of crimes. Shotguns are used more. And governmental agencies after the Clinton gun ban went into effect said that it had a negligible impact on firearm crime.[/QUOTE]
assault weapon sounds really scarey tho
Yay!
[QUOTE=Generic.Monk;39912018]Yay![/QUOTE]
Like the last one that totally stopped Columbine, right?
This is a step away from Terrorism America. You can finally begin to end your wars with brown people, homosexuals, and child murderers.
For someone to support this they'd have to be so astronomically fucking ignorant it wouldn't even make sense.
[QUOTE=0FucksGiven;39911610]assault weapon sounds really scarey tho[/QUOTE]
This is a great website to send to any misinformed people
[url]http://www.assaultweapon.info/[/url]
[QUOTE=CoalTen;39913289]This is a great website to send to any misinformed people
[url]http://www.assaultweapon.info/[/url][/QUOTE]
Totally unbiased website.
[QUOTE=Leo Leonardo;39913252]For someone to support this they'd have to be so astronomically fucking ignorant it wouldn't even make sense.[/QUOTE]
Welcome to fucking Congress.
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;39913312]Totally unbiased website.[/QUOTE]
It's factual and cites it's information, which is more than we can say for you.
[QUOTE=Raidyr;39911592]But assault weapons aren't even used in the vast majority of crimes. Shotguns are used more. And governmental agencies after the Clinton gun ban went into effect said that it had a negligible impact on firearm crime.[/QUOTE]
"we don't need your fancy 'statistics' and 'facts' when we can just railroad whatever the fuck we want directly into the people's collective rectum! choo choo motherfuckers"
-actual quote from an actual senator
[QUOTE=Ridge;39913340]It's factual and cites it's information, which is more than we can say for you.[/QUOTE]
The implication from the site is that it's an unbiased source of information, when it actually leans too far in one direction to be considered unbiased.
For instance, blaming Al Gore losing the election in 2000 on the AWB is a pretty obvious one.
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;39913383]The implication from the site is that it's an unbiased source of information, when it actually leans too far in one direction to be considered unbiased.
For instance, blaming Al Gore losing the election in 2000 on the AWB is a pretty obvious one.[/QUOTE]
Note how it says "[I]Other Democrats[/I] have stated that the AWB may have cost Al Gore the 2000 presidential election."
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;39913383]The implication from the site is that it's an unbiased source of information, when it actually leans too far in one direction to be considered unbiased.
For instance, blaming Al Gore losing the election in 2000 on the AWB is a pretty obvious one.[/QUOTE]
It has links to websites like the FBI where it sources it's information from.
[QUOTE=Saber15;39913423]Note how it says "[I]Other Democrats[/I] have stated that the AWB may have cost Al Gore the 2000 presidential election."[/QUOTE]
Such as?
[editline]14th March 2013[/editline]
[QUOTE=Ridge;39913437]It has links to websites like the FBI where it sources it's information from.[/QUOTE]
So the FBI keeps stats on Democrats blaming the AWB for losing the election?
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;39913460]
[editline]14th March 2013[/editline]
So the FBI keeps stats on Democrats blaming the AWB for losing the election?[/QUOTE]
Either you are fishing for zings or you have missing the point down to a science.
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;39913312]Totally unbiased website.[/QUOTE]
you're a silly goose, sobotnik.
[QUOTE=dogmachines;39913479]or you have missing the point down to a science.[/QUOTE]
Have you read any of his other debate posts?
Banning assault weapons would be like banning swords because somebody got stabbed to death with a hunting knife.
For once I'm rather glad of the GOP clusterfuck in Congress. For all the hell it causes, this one time, it will actually do some good for once.
[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;39911583]I doubt democrats would vote for it as well. Voting for gun control is an excellent way not to get re-elected.[/QUOTE]
And somehow Feinstein has proposed three such bans and is still in office. But in general you're right, for the most part supporting one of these bans is political suicide unless your entire political career revolves around pushing them.
a step in the right direction of banning all guns.
[QUOTE=asteroidrules;39914781]And somehow Feinstein has proposed three such bans and is still in office. But in general you're right, for the most part supporting one of these bans is political suicide unless your entire political career revolves around pushing them.[/QUOTE]
Thats cause she's a California democrat, that state is perpetually democrat.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.