• Senate probes Loretta Lynch's alleged interference in Clinton email investigation
    4 replies, posted
[quote]A bipartisan group of Senate Judiciary Committee leaders is examining former Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s alleged interference in the Hillary Clinton email investigation. The group is seeking details about Lynch's communication with a Clinton campaign aide, Amanda Renteria, as well as copies of documents and information about whether the FBI investigated the alleged communication. The letters, sent Thursday, are signed by Senate Judiciary Chairman Charles Grassley, Ranking Democrat Dianne Feinstein, as well as Sens. Lindsey Graham and Sheldon White House, the chair and ranker on the subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism. The senators question Open Society Foundations' Leonard Benardo and its General Counsel Gail Scovell, as well as Renteria and Lynch, about a May 24 story from the Washington Post that reported Lynch assured Renteria that she would not let the FBI investigation into Clinton go too far.[/quote] [url]http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/senate-probes-loretta-lynchs-alleged-interference-clinton-email/story?id=48237960[/url]
Good. I hope liberals don't try to gloss over this or downplay it because they're afraid it's just some evil right wing distraction from the Trump investigation. From the moment it came out that she met with Bill Clinton during the investigation it was clear that this was not a fair or partial investigation and Comey's testimony only further proves that.
I mean given the timing it [B]is[/B] probably meant as somewhat a distraction. Nonetheless, it is important.
I would love to see the day when the Clintons become irrelevant. If you lost against an incompetent sentient Cheeto...you don't deserve to be relevant...
[QUOTE=Uber22;52394844]I would love to see the day when the Clintons become irrelevant. If you lost against an incompetent sentient Cheeto...you don't deserve to be relevant...[/QUOTE] While I hate to be semantic, she lost in the system while having more votes overall. I don't disagree with the matter of them losing political power, but they should be relevant in the matter of handling future campaigns since there were clear plays that should've been done and should be vital in the current game such as swing states. Can't change the past, but the future can be a tabula rasa if we learn from the past. It'll be interesting to see what results of this.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.