Irish election candidate wants gay people jailed, adultery made illegal and rock bands outlawed - Polidicks

[URL="http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/election-candidate-wants-gay-people-jailed-adultery-made-illegal-and-rock-bands-outlawed-31176105.html"]http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/election-candidate-wants-gay-people-jailed-adultery-made-illegal-and-rock-bands-outlawed-31176105.html[/URL] [IMG]http://ulsterherald.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Susan-Anne-White-460x331.jpg[/IMG] [QUOTE]"I don't consider myself extreme - not at all," she said. "It is society that has moved. Not so far in the past, most people would have shared my views. "My views only seem extreme because society has moved away from God's principles."[/QUOTE] [QUOTE]Mrs White said she opposes feminism "with all her might", and [B]says it is to blame for the recession[/B]. "Feminism is responsible for many of the social ills we see all around us," she added. "They [feminists] are responsible for the economy - they destroyed the whole concept of a family wage with the father as the bread-winner and the stay-at-home mother. They make women feel they have to be out in the workforce."[/QUOTE] [QUOTE]She said anyone involved in homosexual or adulterous practices should be jailed. [...] Mrs White claims she is a "true friend" to the gay community. "I tell them the truth," she added. "The person who is not a friend,[B] the person who is the enemy to the homosexual is the person who pats them on the back and says their lifestyle is perfectly normal and acceptable.[/B]"[/QUOTE]

I feel like I'm staring into the soul of Satan when I look into her dark beady eyes... Go back to Hell, demon!

She sounds like an old cunt, don't worry, a flight of stairs will probably take her out at some point, she can't dodge coffins forever.

Her eyes look so dark, Like I look into them and all I can see is pure evil.

i honestly couldn't tell what gender she was from that picture she looks like a grimy, wrinkled pillowcase that came to life

These kind of people should never hold a place of power.

See I knew rock 'n roll was still the devil's music.

Northern Irish election candidate*

[QUOTE]"My views only seem extreme because society has moved away from God's principles."[/QUOTE] Absolutely hate when people like her try to integrate religion into society, it is fucking boring to have a religious society like holy shit Besides I know Ireland is catholic af but I would imagine they'll soon follow the trend that's happening in the UK where Atheist are becoming larger than Christians and Catholics

I'm not surprised there's still people like this around. Abandon your close-minded ways and achieve acceptance and enlightenment!

[quote]"It is society that has moved. Not so far in the past, most people would have shared my views."[/quote] Well I was going to joke that she'd have a strong chance in 1856 but it sounds like she acknowledges that herself

[QUOTE=fruxodaily;47617545]Absolutely hate when people like her try to integrate religion into society, it is fucking boring to have a religious society like holy shit Besides I know Ireland is catholic af but I would imagine they'll soon follow the trend that's happening in the UK where Atheist are becoming larger than Christians and Catholics[/QUOTE] Isn't northern Ireland protestant?

I should point out that Northern Ireland is a different country to Ireland. She also wont be voted in because because the people of West Tyrone probably wont want gay people jailed, rock music banned, and feminism abolished.

I can agree with adultery. The rest is nuts.

I believe we gotten pass the point of thinking rock is not the spawn of hell...

[QUOTE=itisjuly;47617570]I can agree with adultery. The rest is nuts.[/QUOTE] Adultery is a shitty thing to do but it shouldn't be illegal.

Get off my lawn you kids!

[QUOTE=Janus Vesta;47617582]Adultery is a shitty thing to do but it shouldn't be illegal.[/QUOTE] Why not? If you enter a lawful monogamous marriage then I don't see why cheating on someone you marry shouldn't have consequences with the law.

[QUOTE=itisjuly;47617588]Why not? If you enter a lawful monogamous marriage then I don't see why cheating on someone you marry shouldn't have consequences with the law.[/QUOTE] The consequences of adultery is, in many cases, divorce. The law doesn't need to punish someone for there to be consequences.

[QUOTE=Janus Vesta;47617608]The consequences of adultery is, in many cases, divorce. The law doesn't need to punish someone for there to be consequences.[/QUOTE] But divorce due to adultery still results in asset split. I think if you cheat you should not get 50% cut after a divorce.

[QUOTE=itisjuly;47617588]Why not? If you enter a lawful monogamous marriage then I don't see why cheating on someone you marry shouldn't have consequences with the law.[/QUOTE] I would say it's the couple's business, not the government's. They're only hurting eachother, they haven't done anything that the government should protect other people from.

[QUOTE=itisjuly;47617588]Why not? If you enter a lawful monogamous marriage then I don't see why cheating on someone you marry shouldn't have consequences with the law.[/QUOTE] Because the act itself doesn't damage society, at large, in the slightest.

[QUOTE=Demomanjaro;47617617]Because the act itself doesn't damage society, at large, in the slightest.[/QUOTE]Last I checked laws are there to protect individuals too, not just society at large.

[QUOTE=itisjuly;47617588]Why not? If you enter a lawful monogamous marriage then I don't see [b] why[/b] cheating on someone you marry should[b]n't[/B] have consequences with the law.[/QUOTE] Because "why not" is never a good reason for anything. Come up with better reasons. And by "why not" I mean the one in the second sentence.

[QUOTE=FPtje;47617680]Because "why not" is never a good reason for anything. Come up with better reasons. And by "why not" I mean the one in the second sentence.[/QUOTE] Cheating often results in divorce. Current divorce laws split assets in a way that does not take cause of divorce into consideration. I think if you cheat on your partner, it should be taken into account during divorce and less assets be directed to the cheater. Otherwise you're just rewarding their behavior while fucking over the other person.

[QUOTE=itisjuly;47617615]But divorce due to adultery still results in asset split. I think if you cheat you should not get 50% cut after a divorce.[/QUOTE] That's why people get prenuptial agreements. You just have it written there that you share of the goods will be forfeit in case of adultery.

[QUOTE=itisjuly;47617570]I can agree with adultery. The rest is nuts.[/QUOTE] do you really think law should regulate love?

[QUOTE=Ragekipz;47617707]That's why people get prenuptial agreements. You just have it written there that you share of the goods will be forfeit in case of adultery.[/QUOTE]In most courts this won't hold. Assets acquired during marriage very rarely can be held by a prenup, a reason like adultery won't hold. Even prenups that apply to only assets acquired before marriage can sometimes be invalidated in court, during marriage ones almost always will. [editline]28th April 2015[/editline] [QUOTE=JurajIsNotPirat;47617725]do you really think law should regulate love?[/QUOTE] Marriage is a legal entity regulated by law. So love is already regulated by law. I don't see your point.

[QUOTE=itisjuly;47617694]Cheating often results in divorce. Current divorce laws split assets in a way that does not take cause of divorce into consideration. I think if you cheat on your partner, it should be taken into account during divorce and less assets be directed to the cheater. Otherwise you're just rewarding their behavior while fucking over the other person.[/QUOTE] Does criminalisation (which is what you initially agreed with) accurately help in solving that problem? If it does, is it an appropriate measure or can one think of better ones? I mean criminalisation is a big move in solving the problem of sharing assets.

[QUOTE=FPtje;47617741]Does criminalisation (which is what you initially agreed with) accurately help in solving that problem? If it does, is it an appropriate measure or can one think of better ones? I mean criminalisation is a big move in solving the problem of sharing assets.[/QUOTE] Yeah I agree, criminalisation is overboard. But marriage laws need to be modified to take cheating into account when dealing with divorce. Right now it's a free pass.