Sanders Campaign Says Photo Proves Clinton Broke Rules During Univision Debate - Polidicks

[quote][media]https://twitter.com/edhenry/status/707788419703951360/photo/1[/media] A Bernie Sanders aide told Fox News’ Ed Henry that a picture of Secretary Hillary Clinton backstage with her campaign aides during a commercial break shows that she broke the rules during Wednesday’s Univision debate. The rules of the debate banned candidates from meeting with staff during breaks. When contacted by Henry, Clinton spokeswoman Jen Palmieri responded by saying she didn’t know the photo existed.[/quote] [url]http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sanders-campaign-says-this-photo-proves-clinton-broke-rules-during-univision-debate/[/url] I'm certain this will help Hillary Clinton's trustworthiness problem.

Well I may be wrong, but I believe the polls for the "Least Trustworthy Candidates" are the current front runners with both parties at the moment.

Sanders still destroyed her regardless of this. The last two debates have been catastrophes for Clinton. Sanders keeps bringing up corruption and she can't run away from it.

[quote] Clinton spokeswoman Jen Palmieri responded by saying she didn’t know the photo existed.[/quote] What kind of response is that?

[QUOTE]Clinton spokeswoman Jen Palmieri responded by saying she didn’t know the photo existed.[/QUOTE] This is pretty much exactly saying "we didn't know we got caught". It's hardly even paraphrasing. What the hell are politics, even

[QUOTE=CommunistCookie;49908904]What kind of response is that?[/QUOTE] Typical?

Not like the DNC are going to do anything.

[QUOTE]Clinton spokeswoman Jen Palmieri responded by saying she didn’t know the photo existed.[/QUOTE] Do they have no shame? Not even an apology? Just "Shit, we didn't know we got caught!"

[QUOTE=CommunistCookie;49908904]What kind of response is that?[/QUOTE] Yeah, in the time it takes to write that response she could have just looked at the photo and brought herself up to speed lol

[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;49908932]Not like the DNC are going to do anything.[/QUOTE] i can't even imagine what they're going to be able to do about it, slap her on the wrist? tell her she did a bad? they can't ban her from a debate or really leverage anything against her

soo... I think she lost florida, with the debate and this.

[QUOTE=OmniConsUme;49908983]soo... I think she lost florida, with the debate and this.[/QUOTE] That's silly, she is up over 30 pts in Florida.

[QUOTE=Da Bomb76;49909016]That's silly, she is up over 30 pts in Florida.[/QUOTE] The polls could be rather meaningless as we've seen, not to mention there are no polls from after the debate as of yet.

[QUOTE=CommunistCookie;49908904]What kind of response is that?[/QUOTE] It's a "can not confirm nor deny" thing; doubt this will seriously harm clinton or the DNC's views of her [editline]11th March 2016[/editline] [QUOTE=DaMastez;49909088]The polls could be rather meaningless as we've seen, not to mention there are no polls from after the debate as of yet.[/QUOTE] True however they have been pretty spot on for the DNC side

[QUOTE=JohnFisher89;49909103] True however they have been pretty spot on for the DNC side[/QUOTE] [URL="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/mi/michigan_democratic_presidential_primary-5224.html"]"Spot on"[/URL] Not the only case: [URL="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/sc/south_carolina_democratic_presidential_primary-4167.html"]SC 20 points off[/URL] [URL="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/nh/new_hampshire_democratic_presidential_primary-3351.html"]NH 9 points off[/URL] I'm sure there's more.

[QUOTE=DaMastez;49909088]The polls could be rather meaningless as we've seen, not to mention there are no polls from after the debate as of yet.[/QUOTE] They could be, but nobody has been able to come up with a cogent explanation as to why Michigan was such a surprise yet. It could have been the debate, it could have been the demographics and economy of Michigan, it could have been bad polling methods, or it could have been something else unknown, or a fluke. There isn't a good reason to map the results of Michigan onto any other states, especially Florida considering how different it is. [editline]10th March 2016[/editline] But never give up hope. If you can vote in Florida or any of the other states on the 15th, make sure you do so.

[QUOTE=Da Bomb76;49909191]They could be, but nobody has been able to come up with a cogent explanation as to why Michigan was such a surprise yet. It could have been the debate, it could have been the demographics and economy of Michigan, it could have been bad polling methods, or it could have been something else unknown, or a fluke. There isn't a good reason to map the results of Michigan onto any other states, especially Florida considering how different it is. [editline]10th March 2016[/editline] But never give up hope. If you can vote in Florida or any of the other states on the 15th, make sure you do so.[/QUOTE] Few democrats (according to CNN live coverage) where voting for Kasich to fuck with Trumps ability to win the state. It didn't do anything at all but 7% of voters in the Republican primary where Democrats. Maybe that might've done it?

Whereas if Bernie pulled this shit, the DNC would've banned him from future debates therefore cancelling them, or some type of bullshit like that.

[QUOTE=Reshy;49908809][url]http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sanders-campaign-says-this-photo-proves-clinton-broke-rules-during-univision-debate/[/url] I'm certain this will help Hillary Clinton's trustworthiness problem.[/QUOTE] Does she even want to be respected and trustful? Like, either its fundraising in New York the day before a caucus, keeping her speeches secret, the obvious dodge "wipe it like a cloth?" when questioned on her email server, meeting up with her team against the rules, and the rest of her other shady crap. Why is she such a shit campaigner and why couldn't the party put someone at least somewhat competent up there as their establishment pick? Her success is totally reliant on name recognition and low information voters.

It's really obnoxious to see her and her husband getting slaps on the wrist for breaking rules with things like this, Bill Clinton showing up in voting areas, etc.

She really cant go a month without scandal. I hope this changes floridas decision along with his awesome debate

I have yet to meet anyone in my daily life who doesn't absolutely hate her, who the hell are all these people voting for her? She's really fucking shady But then again I'm from Michigan, so...

Not to sound like an idiot, but what exactly is going on in the picture?

She's still probably going to win seeing how the primary numbers are looking so far.

[QUOTE=Daddy-of-war;49909616]Not to sound like an idiot, but what exactly is going on in the picture?[/QUOTE] Hillary allegedly with her campaign aides during a commerical break in the debate. A violation of the debate rules

Unless someone can prove me wrong, and isn't biased heavily towards Sanders, I want legit sources that Sanders isn't going to lose here.

[QUOTE=Pvt. Martin;49909649]Unless someone can prove me wrong, and isn't biased heavily towards Sanders, I want legit sources that Sanders isn't going to lose here.[/QUOTE] Wut? Lose the primaries? No source knows that definitively. The polls in michigan were off by 20 points, a clinton staffer got immunity in the email case, who knows whats gonna happen next.

[QUOTE=cody8295;49909657]Wut? Lose the primaries? No source knows that definitively. The polls in michigan were off by 20 points, a clinton staffer got immunity in the email case, who knows whats gonna happen next.[/QUOTE] Well at this rate, I can't help but be stuck between hopeful and jaded. I want Sanders to win, I voted for him, but Clinton has all the Get out of Free Jail cards I feel, and thus she'll have an equal chance by that alone.

Why won't Sanders call her out on this at the next debate?

[QUOTE=lope;49909716]Why won't Sanders call her out on this at the next debate?[/QUOTE] It's irrelevant to his campaign. Sanders' popularity is based on his policies and stances, not gimmicks and gotchas and ad hominems.