• Bethesda feels the pressure as petition to break silence in regards to Fallout 4 reaches 11 signatur
    118 replies, posted
They have no choice but to tell us the truth, that they're 99% done, and the game will hit shelves tomorrow morning. [URL="http://www.product-reviews.net/2014/04/24/fallout-4-silence-prompts-petition/"]Source.[/URL]
Please give me a break. The whole Half-Life thing has literally given me the ability to contain any and all hype and to keep me patient.
If people are legitimately pissed of about no news on fallout 4, they should thank god that they aren't half life fans then.
[QUOTE=Viva;44634191]If people are legitimately pissed of about no news on fallout 4, they should thank god that they aren't half life fans then.[/QUOTE] Duke Nukem.
First two replies are about HL. GG facepunch
If it doesn't run on Gamebyro it isn't a fallout game. It's not fallout without the bugs, glitches and crashing.
[QUOTE=Zenreon117;44634197]Duke Nukem.[/QUOTE] At least for Duke Nukem you had some valid info here and there, HL3 is a massive blank page with nearly no info.
[QUOTE=darth-veger;44634241]At least for Duke Nukem you had some valid info here and there, HL3 is a massive blank page with nearly no info.[/QUOTE] HL3 is kept under tighter wraps than top secret government info.
[QUOTE=darth-veger;44634241]At least for Duke Nukem you had some valid info here and there, HL3 is a massive blank page with nearly no info.[/QUOTE] yeah but, with duke nukem it ended up being total shit
[QUOTE=Thomo_UK;44634240]If it doesn't run on Gamebyro it isn't a fallout game. It's not fallout without the bugs, glitches and crashing.[/QUOTE] it's not a fallout game if it's based on fallout 3 you mean
[QUOTE=bisousbisous;44634253]HL3 is kept under tighter wraps than top secret government info.[/QUOTE] At this point I kind of hope another hack happens like with the HL2 beta, but instead of a broken unfinished game, when the community finally manages to compile what Valve has been working on for nearly a decade is.... [url]http://puu.sh/8lSuP.jpg[/url]
I didn't pay attention to the survivor 2299 thing. What was that about?
I think it turned out to be a fan hoax.
They're announcing (barring any games they have in the pipeline that I'm unaware of) [i]something[/i] at E3 anyways seeing as though they've registered a booth.
[QUOTE=Thomo_UK;44634240]If it doesn't run on Gamebyro it isn't a fallout game. It's not fallout without the bugs, glitches and crashing.[/QUOTE] Fallout and Fallout 2 aren't Fallout games?
[QUOTE=Daemon White;44634308]I didn't pay attention to the survivor 2299 thing. What was that about?[/QUOTE] It was a well made hoax that actually seemed like it could be real, and Bethesda refused to comment on it. They let it run for quite a long time and only after several more fan hoaxes appeared did they decide to say it had nothing to do with them.
[QUOTE=Thomo_UK;44634240]If it doesn't run on Gamebyro it isn't a fallout game. It's not fallout without the bugs, glitches and crashing.[/QUOTE] If it ends up on Gamebryo again I'm gonna cry, for real Then buy it anyway
-SNIP- I'm an ignorant dumbass
I'm sorry but, IMO, at this stage it seems almost certain this isn't going to happen. It's the same with a lot of large ideals that gamers want (Halo PC ports, Half Life 3, Bad Company 3, the big ones), they're just unlikely. I wouldn't be surprised if Bethesdas E3 announcement was just something new that people would most likely share less interest in.
[QUOTE=RustledJimmys;44634415]I'm sorry but, IMO, at this stage it seems almost certain this isn't going to happen. It's the same with a lot of large ideals that gamers want (Halo PC ports, Half Life 3, Bad Company 3, the big ones), they're just unlikely. I wouldn't be surprised if Bethesdas E3 announcement was just something new that people would most likely share less interest in.[/QUOTE] You're probably right, but I still like to dream.
[QUOTE=Robber;44634317]I think it turned out to be a fan hoax.[/QUOTE] Oh, that sucks.
[QUOTE=hippowombat;44634408]I wouldn't mind it being on Creation Engine/something new, but knowing Bethesda I'm sure it'll still be bugtacular.[B] As long as Obsidian isn't the developer I'll be happy[/B].[/QUOTE] I feel the exact opposite way.
[QUOTE=Thomo_UK;44634240]If it doesn't run on Gamebyro it isn't a fallout game. It's not fallout without the bugs, glitches and crashing.[/QUOTE] I will be buggy regardless of engine, Bethesda will always fuck something up no matter how much they try not to
[QUOTE=silentjubjub;44634332]They're announcing (barring any games they have in the pipeline that I'm unaware of) [i]something[/i] at E3 anyways seeing as though they've registered a booth.[/QUOTE] Probably something to do with Wolfenstein: New Order.
[QUOTE=UnidentifiedFlyingTard;44634451]I feel the exact opposite way.[/QUOTE] To each their own <3 :smile:
[QUOTE=Zenreon117;44634197]Duke Nukem.[/QUOTE] yeah with duke nukem you still had info being released all the way from 97 to 2001 then a dry spell until 2006 when light info came up and then 2009 where even more was divulged. At this point Valve has yet to even officially acknowledge Hl3.
[QUOTE=Daemon White;44634456]Probably something to do with Wolfenstein: New Order.[/QUOTE] That comes out before E3 though.
[QUOTE=RustledJimmys;44634483]That comes out before E3 though.[/QUOTE] DLC~
[QUOTE=hippowombat;44634408]As long as Obsidian isn't the developer I'll be happy.[/QUOTE] You must be joking...
[QUOTE=Skyward;44634532]You must be joking...[/QUOTE] Considering that New Vegas still had [URL="http://pastebin.com/5sRs7bq7"]a lot more content[/URL] even with a development time of 18 months along with a well-written (and generally better) story, I'd be thrilled if they did.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.