"Red Alert!" Russian Tanks Seen in Washington DC... on walls of white house. - Polidicks

AAHAHAHAHAH [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqYTaKfMlbU[/media] sputniknews cause [B]MOTHERLAND[/B] and because matching headline [quote]Students of the Russian National Cinematographic School "Set" have found a creative way to respond to Obama's decision not to attend the 2015 Victory Day Parade in Moscow. During a video performance in Washington DC, they projected footages of the previous military parades that were held in Moscow directly onto the walls of the White House. [/quote] [url]http://sputniknews.com/videoclub/20150507/1021823831.html[/url]

How nice of them, bringing the parade to him

Was Obama even at home? Let the poor man have his sleep.

I'm really surprised noone stopped them. Imagine some other pranksters putting obscene stuff on the White House, porn, even.

[QUOTE=Dark RaveN;47679827]I'm really surprised noone stopped them. Imagine some other pranksters putting obscene stuff on the White House, porn, even.[/QUOTE] Is there even a law against showing gay porn on the side of the white house? I want to see that one.

[QUOTE=Dark RaveN;47679827]I'm really surprised noone stopped them. Imagine some other pranksters putting obscene stuff on the White House, porn, even.[/QUOTE] Well letting it happen demonstrates the difference between the US, and Russia where if you photoshop a picture of Putin you get set off to the gulags.

[QUOTE=spiritlol;47679853]Well letting it happen demonstrates the difference between the US, and Russia where if you photoshop a picture of Putin you get set off to the gulags.[/QUOTE] You don't tho. Russia isn't so advanced as US that to enforce all the laws they pass through.

[QUOTE=Dark RaveN;47679868]You don't tho. Russia isn't so advanced as US that to enforce all the laws they pass through.[/QUOTE] Except when its convieniant to silence critics, at least in the US we just use an actual law ment to do that to do that instead of make up excuses and falsify pretenses.

Hah like the us media doesn't silence critics at all when its convenient. That's funny.

DAMN COMMUNISTS! BURN THEM!(Not really this is cool.

Oh cool the sweet Parade is this Saturday again. I like to watch those. Especially because the sweet music. My Avatar has one of his relevance days again, yay!

[QUOTE=Birdman101;47679955]Hah like the us media doesn't silence critics at all when its convenient. That's funny.[/QUOTE] There is a very big difference between being "silenced" by the media and being "silenced" by the Kremlin. One involves being criticized or ignored and the other involves being gunned down .

[QUOTE=Dark RaveN;47679827]I'm really surprised noone stopped them. Imagine some other pranksters putting obscene stuff on the White House, porn, even.[/QUOTE] Probably because it's fake. If the lack of shadows from the columns and even managing to project at such a distance wasn't an obvious clue, then the smooth turn at the end should give you a hint.

I wonder what the government funded news agencies in Russia are going to say about this.

[QUOTE=Murkrow;47680391]Probably because it's fake. If the lack of shadows from the columns and even managing to project at such a distance wasn't an obvious clue, then the smooth turn at the end should give you a hint.[/QUOTE] I admit it looked fake, but I didn't look into it that much. However, now I wonder if someone was to pull this off....

got another source? All i could find was sputnik. Which leads me to believe this is fake.

Fake. Look at the camera movement at :37, not a real camera move or defocus. Some russian probably just did a 2d track and threw the footage on there in After Effects. Also at the end, when the frame rotates, that transition can't happen like that on a building if what we are seeing is from a projector (The video edges is the edge of where the projector is shooting, so how could it possibly rotate out of frame unless they physically picked up the projector?) Also you would likely see beams of light from a projector that strong, it's not easy to project something that bright onto a huge surface without a really expensive one.

[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;47679809]Was Obama even at home? Let the poor man have his sleep.[/QUOTE] He's probably not home anyway, he's probably cheating on Michelle

[QUOTE=alexguydude;47680941]Fake. Look at the camera movement at :37, not a real camera move or defocus. Some russian probably just did a 2d track and threw the footage on there in After Effects. Also at the end, when the frame rotates, that transition can't happen like that on a building if what we are seeing is from a projector (The video edges is the edge of where the projector is shooting, so how could it possibly rotate out of frame unless they physically picked up the projector?) Also you would likely see beams of light from a projector that strong, it's not easy to project something that bright onto a huge surface without a really expensive one.[/QUOTE] I think that literally is what it is. Read this under the assumption it was an after effects project. [quote]Students of the Russian National Cinematographic School "Set" have found a creative way to respond to Obama's decision not to attend the 2015 Victory Day Parade in Moscow. During a video performance in Washington DC, they projected footages of the previous military parades that were held in Moscow directly onto the walls of the White House.[/quote] I don't really understand the OP's "enthusiasim" for lack of a better word on this topic.

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3rGO2WhZGg[/media]

Yes it's fake, something like this would be in more than just one news source(all those people recording with their phones yet nothing about it in social media?). And you can see the projection jittering whenever the camera moves, as if the projection is lagging behind the camera movement, it's most noticeable at the 0:37 mark(when the camera moves and blurs a bit, pay attention to the corners of the projection, it's also noticeable after the 1:04 mark.

Karimatrix this is why people here view Russian "news" sources with skepticism

[QUOTE=Psychokitten;47681009]heck march[/QUOTE] If you're gonna post it at least post the good version [video=youtube;Tb-gI_pFog0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tb-gI_pFog0[/video]

[QUOTE=zakedodead;47681139]If you're gonna post it at least post the good version [video=youtube;Tb-gI_pFog0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tb-gI_pFog0[/video][/QUOTE] Hell March 2 wasn't too bad either, Hell March 3 just tried too hard to be the same but different. There were actually also two different versions of Hell March for Red Alert: one from the PC version (which you posted) and one from the Playstation version's intro for "Retaliation" (which sounds more like Hell March 2, even 3 if you plug your ears and hum while listening). [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-DAoK20ViQ[/media]

[QUOTE=Zero-Point;47681490]Hell March 2 wasn't too bad either, Hell March 3 just tried too hard to be the same but different. There were actually also two different versions of Hell March for Red Alert: one from the PC version (which you posted) and one from the Playstation version's intro for "Retaliation" (which sounds more like Hell March 2, even 3 if you plug your ears and hum while listening). [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-DAoK20ViQ[/media][/QUOTE] The "Retaliation Hell March Version" (and many other remixes from CNC1 and RA1) were actually from Command and Conquer Sole Survivor. Oh and I completely agree, as someone who prefers Hell March 1 over 2, 3 was waaaay to similar to 2. Also there was a really sweet Hell March 1 Remix by From first to Last on the Red Alert 3 Soundtrack [video=youtube;7Pil3JhClNM]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Pil3JhClNM[/video]

[QUOTE=Thlis;47680987]I don't really understand the OP's "enthusiasim" for lack of a better word on this topic.[/QUOTE] karimatrix is our local russian propaganda pusher

[QUOTE=Limed00d;47682868]karimatrix is our local Russian Public Relations Minister of FP [/QUOTE] :eng101: A more fitting title.

Comrade Stalin would be pleased [IMG]http://www.footagefarm.com/stockphotos/JPEG/Stalin & Churchill.jpg[/IMG] [I][B]"Did you see the look on Truman's capitalist face?"[/B][/I]

[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;47679809]Was Obama even at home? Let the poor man have his sleep.[/QUOTE] haha Guys, the president doesn't actually live in the white house...

This is actually a really interesting way to make a point to somebody. Imagine if you lived next to a big building, setting up a projector outside your window onto that building, and you've got a cheap billboard, that's easier than doing graffiti. I dunno how legal it is though. [editline]8th May 2015[/editline] [QUOTE=zach1193;47684138]haha Guys, the president doesn't actually live in the white house...[/QUOTE] Uh... yeah he does. [quote]The White House is the [b]official residence[/b] and principal workplace of the President of the United States, located at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW in Washington, D.C. [b]It has been the residence of every U.S. president since John Adams in 1800.[/b][/quote] [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_House]source[/url]