[quote="CNN"]Washington (CNN) -- A commission set up to assess national security measures on Tuesday gave the U.S. government a failing grade in improving response time to a biological attack.
"Nearly a decade after September 11, 2001, one year after our original report, and one month after the Christmas Day bombing attempt, the United States is failing to address several urgent threats, especially bioterrorism," said former Sen. Bob Graham, chairman of the commission.
"Each of the last three administrations has been slow to recognize and respond to the biothreat. But we no longer have the luxury of a slow learning curve, when we know al Qaeda is interested in bioweapons," Graham said.
"The assessment is not a good one, particularly in the area of biological threats," the report by the Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism said.
"While the government has made progress on preventing such attacks, it is simply not paying consistent and urgent attention to the means of responding quickly and effectively so that they no longer constitute a threat of mass destruction," the report said.
The government barely got a passing grade on oversight of high-containment laboratories.
The commission, headed by Graham, a former Democratic senator from Florida, and Jim Talent, R-Missouri, also gave the government failing grades in congressional oversight and in producing the next generation of security experts.
The delayed response to the H1N1 influenza outbreak demonstrated the United States was "woefully behind" in its ability to produce needed vaccinations and treatments rapidly, the commission said.
"H1N1 came with months of warning," the commission's report said. "But even with time to prepare, the epidemic peaked before most Americans had access to vaccine. A bioattack will come with no such warning."
The commission was set up after Congress passed a bill in 2007 to implement recommendations of the 9/11 Commission.
The commission submitted its report with new recommendations in December 2008, predicting that terrorists would use a weapon of mass destruction -- likely biological -- by 2013 unless the global community quickly launched a forceful strategy to prevent it. The report card released Tuesday is a follow-up to that report, called "World at Risk."
Congress took its lumps in the report as well, especially on its oversight of national security issues.
"Congress has failed to take even the relatively easy first steps to consolidate oversight authority of the Department of Homeland Security," the commission said. "The estimated number of committees and subcommittees that oversee DHS ranges from 82 to 108. Virtually no progress has been made since consolidation was first recommended by the 9/11 Commission in 2004."
Both Congress and the administration were faulted for not funding recruitment and training programs for national security experts.
The government got an "incomplete" for its work on implementing a comprehensive nuclear policy toward Pakistan -- meaning that not enough time had elapsed to give a grade. Other areas in nuclear proliferation, including working with Russia, got middle-of-the-road grades.
"President Obama has undertaken substantial effort to bolster the nonproliferation regime," the commission said. "From his April 2009 speech in Prague to his chairmanship of a United Nations Security Council meeting on the subject and plans for a Global Summit on Nuclear Security, he is attempting to bend current trend lines."
But the commission said that it has concerns "regarding the administration's failure to prevent the lapse of verification mechanisms established under the [Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty]. Ensuring their continuation was very important and insufficient attention was paid to it."
The commission handed out "A" grades for integration of the National Security and Homeland Security councils, designation of a senior adviser for WMD proliferation and terrorism, and development of a national strategy for bioforensics.[/quote]
[b]Report card (PDF):[/b] [url]http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2010/images/01/26/report.card.pdf[/url]
[b]Source:[/b] [url]http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/26/security.report.card/index.html?hpt=T2[/url]
An F = no attention or action taken.
f stands for freedom aka america
freedom = f = america
[editline]08:22AM[/editline]
simple math
I love my country :patriot: :v:
[QUOTE=Kylel999;19860406]I love my country :patriot: :v:[/QUOTE]
I guess someone has to.
I bet a terrorist is reading this now.
They need to do an unscheduled drill.
You can't grade a country on their response according to what they do on paper.
[QUOTE=pentium;19860453]They need to do an unscheduled drill.
You can't grade a country on their response according to what they do on paper.[/QUOTE]
How would you pull that off without freaking out the entire population? :|
The problem in the US is that all security agencies like the CIA and FBI want to do the bust themself, dont comunicate, everything goes wrong, and then blame eachother for not talking. :350:
[QUOTE=Dummkopf;19860449]I bet a terrorist is reading this now.[/QUOTE]
My dad just walked in and read this, he's a convicted terrorist.
[QUOTE=Pascall;19860476]How would you pull that off without freaking out the entire population? :|[/QUOTE]
cost a lot of money too. with our Economy in the shitter right now i dont think anybody wants to schedule a RANDOM CHEMICAL BOMBING hoax
time is money
[QUOTE=radioactive;19860799]My dad just walked in and read this, he's a convicted terrorist.[/QUOTE]
Shouldn't have posted that, we will be in touch Mr. Anderson.
[QUOTE=radioactive;19860799]My dad just walked in and read this, he's a convicted terrorist.[/QUOTE]
Hide everything that could be used as a bomb
Oh wait, everything can.
[QUOTE=Sir M;19860848]Hide everything that could be used as a bomb
Oh wait, everything can.[/QUOTE]
I know of someone who is convinced marijuana can be used as a bomb ON ITS OWN, and thats why the government won't let us have it.
[QUOTE=Deathbyfire;19860987]I know of someone who is convinced marijuana can be used as a bomb ON ITS OWN, and thats why the government won't let us have it.[/QUOTE]
But it is a bomb man...
[QUOTE=Mr_Sun;19860819]cost a lot of money too. with our Economy in the shitter right now i dont think anybody wants to schedule a RANDOM CHEMICAL BOMBING hoax
time is money[/QUOTE]
Then we'll do a real random chemical bombing.
It will technically be helpful in the end
[QUOTE=radioactive;19860994]But it is a bomb man...[/QUOTE]
One spliff will kill you.
It's probably a company looking for a contract.
[QUOTE=Dummkopf;19860449]I bet a terrorist is reading this now.[/QUOTE]
I thought the same thing. :tinfoil:
F for fabulous.
:911:
Well...there's always room for improvement.
Ahaha, and just the other day Discovery Channel aired this long episode of Future Weapons where they were talking about anti-bioterrorism methods.
I don't remember a bioterror threat in the US.
[img]http://www.replikultes.net/medias/uploads/films/scary_movie/scary_movie_11_dumbass.jpg[/img]
"Well at least you got one A!"
[QUOTE=Dummkopf;19860449]I bet a terrorist is reading this now.[/QUOTE]
Yeah Chemical Ali is so pissed right now, first he finds out the virgins he were promised are men now this.
America needs to create the BSAA
[QUOTE=Kylel999;19860406]I love my country :patriot: :v:[/QUOTE]
I love not being killed from biological weapons.
:patriot::patriot::patriot:
Horray for America!
Oh well, I guess we can't be the best at everything.
[QUOTE=radioactive;19860799]My dad just walked in and read this, he's a convicted terrorist.[/QUOTE]
Mr. Norton will be apprehended shortly.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
