The first one got me, was cracking up at the gorilla.
I always really loved this one;
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubNF9QNEQLA[/media]
The last video explains why Agent 47 can disguise as someone else without being noticed.
[QUOTE=Sherow_Xx;35905041]I always really loved this one;
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubNF9QNEQLA[/media][/QUOTE]
I only caught the things the old lady and the guy in the middle changed. Everything else, I missed :(
[QUOTE=Sherow_Xx;35905041]I always really loved this one;
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubNF9QNEQLA[/media][/QUOTE]
I caught the bear changing, the paintings, the flower pot and the curtains. Nothing more.
It just seems like they're picking on some senile old man in the last video.
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBPG_OBgTWg[/media]
A better one of "The Door" from OP.
It's not that I don't see the changes, they're just making too many of them for me too keep up. There's too much to look at. "Did their hair change? No. Did anyone change their shirt? No. Are they standing in a different order? No. What about the scenery? Oh, that was a bear and now it's a knight."
Totally useless and lame research
[QUOTE=Reader;35911415]Totally useless and lame research[/QUOTE]
Really? That's interesting because this "useless research" has been used to teach people that while driving they need to be more perceptive and avoid selective attention when making lane changes, as to not just look for other cars. These videos are often employed in traffic schools, and I bet there's a not so small amount of bicyclists who owe their life to these videos in particular.
[QUOTE=dvondrake;35911297]Second one was just grasping at straws. Such trivial details--it's not that I wouldn't have noticed them, it's just that I didn't care.[/QUOTE]
I think it's more like as Foogooman says, there's simply too much for the brain to keep track of. When I was watching the second video, I noticed the scarf disappearing, and I was also completely certain that the plates, cups, pepsi bottle and cutlery was changing. The difference between the two is that the scarf was distinctive change, while all the stuff going on on the table is just a clusterfuck that the human mind can't keep up with. As a result, I saw no changes happening on the table, even though I knew it was happening.
[editline]11th May 2012[/editline]
And that's also why the third one was easy. I was expecting the background to change because there was so much shit going on back there, but it turns out he just got a whole new set of clothes, which was very easy to notice.
Didn't notice that it was a different guy though. I think they look pretty similar...
On the first one I counted 15 passes and saw the bear.
The rest where pretty cool, but if I'm just casually watching a video, or listening to a conversation it's not that surprisingly most people aren't going to notice subtle changes.
Damnit! Stop cheating with little things!
[QUOTE=Elements;35905577][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBPG_OBgTWg[/media]
A better one of "The Door" from OP.[/QUOTE]
This one is incredible... How one can not notice how the person you are speaking to goes from a white male to an asian woman is beyond me.
i won the first one!
counted to 11 and caught the gorilla, gorilla threw off my counting because he was in the way of several shots
noticed the dumb dialog, the poor acting, and 3 of the 9 editing mistakes
saw it immediately
[QUOTE=ButtsexV3;35934256]counted to 11 and caught the gorilla, gorilla threw off my counting because he was in the way of several shots
noticed the dumb dialog, the poor acting, and 3 of the 9 editing mistakes
saw it immediately[/QUOTE]
Do you want an award or something?
Also noticing the dumb dialog and acting wasn't part of the test... lol
You know what would be neat? I've noticed that when I know the video is for selective attention, I will more easily spot things. What they should do is have a video that is purportedly testing selective attention, and then instead of showing the real differences at the end they should show fake ones. That way it's actually testing how your memory changes when you are told something, but without expecting the test and skewing the results. I'm not sure if that made sense or not, though. Somewhat difficult to explain.
[QUOTE=Exxon;35934344]Do you want an award or something?
Also noticing the dumb dialog and acting wasn't part of the test... lol[/QUOTE]
I was just pointing out how poor it was.
calm your tits
[QUOTE=Sherow_Xx;35905041]I always really loved this one;
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubNF9QNEQLA[/media][/QUOTE]
I caught the knight, the dead guy, and the detective's coat.
I was not expecting 21 changes.
[QUOTE=Crimptor;35934437]You know what would be neat? I've noticed that when I know the video is for selective attention, I will more easily spot things. What they should do is have a video that is purportedly testing selective attention, and then instead of showing the real differences at the end they should show fake ones. That way it's actually testing how your memory changes when you are told something, but without expecting the test and skewing the results. I'm not sure if that made sense or not, though. Somewhat difficult to explain.[/QUOTE]
I have a feeling that they did that in the video with the guy that makes a phone calll. The changes they did seem too trivial.
I've watched similar things that have worked with me before, but I knew what to expect with these so they didn't fool me. I hoped they would actually because it's kind of cool
[editline]13th May 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=Sherow_Xx;35905041]I always really loved this one;
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubNF9QNEQLA[/media][/QUOTE]
ok this one got me
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
