[QUOTE=343N;50192579]that's a big fucking watermark[/QUOTE]
Christ you're right. Though I don't blame him for the amount of people who just re-upload to webm without credit, it's a bit distracting.
[QUOTE=Hogie bear;50192745]Christ you're right. Though I don't blame him for the amount of people who just re-upload to webm without credit, it's a bit distracting.[/QUOTE]
I had at least 6-7 videos of mine reuploaded, had to take security measures, even though I completely hate watermarking :/
How about making the watermark almost completely transparent? I never tested if you could counter-watermark something transparent by adding the same font/shape and making it black instead of white but even when it is possible, you could minimally transform it (move, twist, scale) over the length of the video (in a way where no one notices) so it makes it difficult to remove and most people (like those who re-upload) will give up when more effort is needed on something.
[QUOTE=DasMatze;50197471]How about making the watermark almost completely transparent? I never tested if you could counter-watermark something transparent by adding the same font/shape and making it black instead of white but even when it is possible, you could minimally transform (move, twist, scale) over the length of the video (in a way where no one notices).[/QUOTE]
The thing is, most of the people who re-upload things don't use video editors well and probably don't know how to do that.
But yeah making it more transparent would definitely help I feel.
[QUOTE=DasMatze;50197471]How about making the watermark almost completely transparent? I never tested if you could counter-watermark something transparent by adding the same font/shape and making it black instead of white but even when it is possible, you could minimally transform it (move, twist, scale) over the length of the video (in a way where no one notices) so it makes it difficult to remove and most people (like those who re-upload) will give up when more effort is needed on something.[/QUOTE]
Might actually do that in the future
Or just use my channel pic at half transparency
[QUOTE=Cspeti;50198047]Might actually do that in the future
Or just use my channel pic at half transparency[/QUOTE]
Some people put water marks in specific points of the video e.g. the bits that are most likely to get cut out and re-uploaded, that's probably the best way you can do it.
Nice job, although if you were going for the shaky cam look, the movement seemed a little stiff to me. I've never used SFM, so I don't know if that's something you can control or not, but either way, it's just an observation
The sounds seem too loud, like each of them are right up in the face.
Is there a way in SFM to place sound effects in the environment? So that there's positioning and distance with them in relation to the camera, I think that would help it.
[QUOTE=Talishmar;50198400]The sounds seem too loud, like each of them are right up in the face.
Is there a way in SFM to place sound effects in the environment? So that there's positioning and distance with them in relation to the camera, I think that would help it.[/QUOTE]
You don't know how much I wish SFM had that.
[QUOTE=Cspeti;50200204]You don't know how much I wish SFM had that.[/QUOTE]
I mean it technically does. You can record yourself as a scout or whatever saying one of his voice commands in the place you want the sound to be. Then you just have to replace the voice clip like you would a sound mod and it would work I think.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
