So most people can agree that our universe was created by the big bang, right? But beyond that it's varied. I believe i have come up with a theory that can take in ANYthing and still work.
Imagine that at the beginning everything was in a ball at the center of the universe. big bang happens, universe expands outwards and every second, millisecond, nanosecond it creates another layer of everything at that time. this goes on infinitely.
According to this everything is simultaneous because they all exist in this ever-expanding (onion) yet time still moves outward from the center in that very same expansion. So basically everything IS (exists) at once but it progresses at the same time.
I know space/time is supposed to be a flat plain, but could it be that the universe is so expansive that the plain of space/time is really the outer-layer of a sphere?
Discuss.
This honestly makes no sense. :confused:
Do you have any evidence?
Theory*
[QUOTE=redwall119;30751018]Theory*[/QUOTE]
There are these things called "Edit" buttons...
Its already in the title.
The creator of the universe is weeping as we speak.
[QUOTE=redwall119;30750912]...I know space/time is supposed to be a flat plain...[/QUOTE]
:cawg:
Theories still have credible evidence you know
[QUOTE=redwall119;30751044]Its already in the title.[/QUOTE]
He's asking if there's any evidence that supports your theory. It's pretty useless without any quantifiable means of testing it.
You're gonna need some proof for these things or else noone's ever gonna take you seriously, man.
its not a comprehensive theory ><
its thoughts on the universe.
space time and gravity is like rolling down a hill
damn i didnt want a lecture i wanted to put it out there.
[QUOTE=redwall119;30751143]its not a comprehensive theory ><
its thoughts on the universe.[/QUOTE]
So what is there to discuss?
[QUOTE=redwall119;30751143]its not a comprehensive theory ><
its thoughts on the universe.[/QUOTE]
Then it's not a theory. A theory is always backed up by some sort of proof or reasonable suspicion. This sounds like you got high and went "this sounds cool maaaan, I'm gonna share it without thinking about it making any sense".
Ok it's thoughts that's better. I could just make theory that OP is a little bit crazy, but that wouldn't just work.
[sp]Even though I could use this thread as a piece of evidence. That would be one more piece of evidence than you have though[/sp]
[QUOTE=doomkiwi;30751182]Then it's not a theory. A theory is always backed up by some sort of proof or reasonable suspicion. This sounds like you got high and went "this sounds cool maaaan, I'm gonna share it without thinking about it making any sense".[/QUOTE] i just said its not a theory.
[QUOTE=redwall119;30751163]damn i didnt want a lecture i wanted to put it out there.[/QUOTE]
Not really threadworthy. Would be ok to post in a science megathread or something I guess.
[QUOTE=redwall119;30751163]damn i didnt want a lecture i wanted to put it out there.[/QUOTE]
But lectures are the only way we'll understand.
If you just throw an Idea out there without effectively explaining it in detail, no one is going to understand it.
Also what you said just now sounds like an excuse not to type out a full explanation.
If I've read it right, what you said it just relativity.
Also, this is a bad thread.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.