Really am hating this moral crusade against banning/wiping people who do anything offensive
Don't get me wrong, some of Tyler's lyrics are questionable (especially his rape comments and derogatory words against women) and other artist as well who have done some sort of things similar (I think the Weeknd said some transphobic shit once that got people upset) or even Earl Sweatshirt's first album contained a pile load of just horrendously fucked up lyrics about raping virtually anything that moves an inch and then killing them in the process (though I'd be lying if I said I didn't enjoy his album)
But while my personal feelings are there, I don't feel like they should be banned because I disagree with the content or find them terrible in general, they're as he says works of art and are not to be taken seriously in the slightest. Tyler is an idiot but he's not to be taken seriously and so are many artist like him
I wouldn't even say it's a left wing problem it's the left and right somehow clashing together with censorship and banning anything they find offensive for different purposes but still the same material
[editline]1st September 2015[/editline]
Also one argument with banning him was for Tyler inciting violence onto others but there's only been one real direct mention from him wanting to hurt someone and that was Bruno Mars in Yonkers during when he was blowing up and nobody took that seriously
This has been bugging me for a while, why does Anthony put those glitchy stutters in his videos?
Tyler killed my dog ban him
For some reason this guys really reminds of Maynard James Keenan.
I can understand how bullying can cause a harmful psychological impact on a person.
I know that first-hand.
But has there ever been any proof that indirect obscenity can cause any psychological harm whatsoever?
Americans subject their children to graphic violence at a young age, they turn out well.
Europeans subject their children to nudity at a yound age, they turn out well.
Where did the idea even originate?
[QUOTE=AnonymaPizza;48600343]I can understand how bullying can cause a harmful psychological impact on a person.
I know that first-hand.
But has there ever been any proof that indirect obscenity can cause any psychological harm whatsoever?
Americans subject their children to graphic violence at a young age, they turn out well.
Europeans subject their children to nudity at a yound age, they turn out well.
Where did the idea even originate?[/QUOTE]
The only idea that has caused some mental trouble for me are ones that create self-defeating thoughts. Limbs exploding off of people? Nah. Boobs? Of course not. But the idea that I should be ashamed for thinking a certain way? Deadly blow to a suggestible mind.
But even then, despite his view on online bullying and stuff like that, it shouldn't cause a ban from an entire country.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
