Christmas day Crotch Bomber Tied to Israel, FBI - Polidicks

[URL="http://english.aljazeera.com/news/articles/39/Christmas-day-crotch-bomber-tied-to-Israel-FBI.html"]Source[/URL] [quote=News] [I]By Jeff Gates[/I] The Christmas Day “terrorist” is the latest in a series of staged incidents meant to make The Clash of Civilizations appear plausible and “the war on terrorism” rational. The storyline does not hold together. Not even a little bit. As usual, the source of this media-fueled fear campaign traces directly to Tel Aviv—with a supporting role by the FBI. How did a young Nigerian Muslim without a passport “slip through” security at Amsterdam’s Schiphol airport? Not only did his itinerary feature an illogical travel route, he paid cash for a high-priced last-minute ticket and boarded without checked baggage. How? ICTS International, the security screening company at Schiphol, was founded by former members of Shin Bet, Israel’s civil security agency, and Israeli executives in charge of El Al security. ICTS had already proven its expertise in mounting this type of operation. In December 2001, Richard “The Shoe Bomber” Reid “slipped through” ICTS security at Charles de Gaulle airport in Paris. Huntleigh USA, an ICTS subsidiary, shared responsibility for security at Logan International Airport in Boston where hijackers for two of the four 911 jets “slipped through” airport security. It gets better. The Crotch Bomber told U.S. authorities that radical Yemeni cleric Anwar al-Awlaki counseled him on the incident. Born and raised in New Mexico, Al-Awlaki moved to Yemen in 2004 after advising the two 911 hijackers who trained in San Diego. He also advised U.S. Army Major Nidal Hasan who is charged with shooting 13 people at Fort Hood, Texas in 2009. It’s not yet clear whether FBI agents were monitoring the Nigerian while he too was advised by Al-Awlaki. If not, that would be an anomaly in a repetitive pattern of FBI complicity. FBI agents not only monitored Major Hasan and Al-Awlaki before the Fort Hood shootings, they also monitored the San Diego hijackers while they were advised by Al-Awlaki. It gets better. Though the Nigerian was foiled while trying to ignite 80 grams of PETN, an explosive sewn into his underwear, that amount was barely enough to dislodge the arm on his seat – of course that assumes it could have been ignited. Without a blasting cap, this “terrorist incident” was doomed to failure even before he “slipped through” security. Could this get even better? Oh yeah. We were told about his father alerting the C.I.A. station chief in Lagos. However we were not informed that his father, a banker, oversaw a Nigerian defense firm that hired Israeli Defense Forces personnel to train Nigerians—in security. Nor were we told that, for decades, Nigeria has been a central hub for Israelis laundering the proceeds of their transnational organized crime. That’s not all. [B] * The Iraq war connection[/B] Four days after 911, San Diego special agent Steven Butler came to the San Diego home of Iraqi-American Munther Ghazal, the Iraqi closest to Saddam Hussein then living in the U.S. That’s the same day Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz proposed in a principal’s meeting at Camp David that the U.S. should invade Iraq. Iraq? Agent Butler paid rent and cashed checks for the two San Diego hijackers while they were being advised by Al-Awlaki. What did Butler want to know? Was Ghazal funding Mel Rockefeller with whom he had traveled to Iraq in 1997? While in Baghdad, they confirmed that Saddam Hussein had mothballed Iraq’s WMD program after the 1991 Gulf War—and was prepared to negotiate his departure without this war. That was four years before 911. The FBI has yet to interview Mel Rockefeller. Meanwhile, the usual suspects are once again profiting off the misery of both sides in a “Clash” that they played a key role in creating. It was Jewish Zionist Bernard Lewis who first coined the term, The Clash of Civilizations. Only later was Harvard professor Samuel Huntington branded with that premise when his book by that name was published in 1996, five years before 911. Israeli-American Michael Chertoff, former Secretary of Homeland Security (aka the rabbi’s son), now promotes firms that manufacturer highly intrusive body scanners that are terrific for spotting crotch bombers unless, of course, an Israeli firm is in charge of security. News reports suggest that the stock of body-scanning firms soared $3 billion in value after this latest “terrorist” incident. Imagine the glee among clients of the Chertoff Group. Meanwhile the U.S. has been transformed from the wealthiest nation to the world’s largest debtor. Nobel economist Joe Stiglitz projects a $3 trillion tab for a war based on fixed, flawed and outright fabricated intelligence—every cent of it borrowed, including $700 billion in interest. [B] * Tel Aviv: The common source of terror[/B] [I]That’s not all. Controlling shares in ICTS are held by Menachem Atzmon, board chairman since 2004. While treasurer of Israel’s long-dominant Likud Party, Atzmon was convicted of campaign finance fraud. His co-treasurer, Ehud Olmert, resigned as Prime Minister in 2008 after being acquitted of fraud amid multiple corruption charges. Did I forget to mention that ICTS was also handling security for London’s bus system when the UK was targeted for its terrorist attack? Did I neglect to note that six months prior to the Shoe Bomber’s flight on American Airlines, Richard Reid was stopped at Schiphol while boarding an El Al flight to Tel Aviv. Shin Bet allowed him to board so he could be monitored in Israel.[/I] Did the Israelis inform their loyal ally about Richard Reid? What do you think? [B]Remember the October 1983 truck bombing of the Marine Barracks in Beirut that left 241 Americans dead? A former Mossad case officer conceded they had a description of the truck. Did our ally tell us? What do you think?[/B] Our withdrawal from Lebanon left the field open to those who specialize in displacing facts with what targeted populations (including our own) can be deceived to believe. [B][U]Recall our belief in Iraqi WMD? Iraqi ties to Al Qaeda? Iraqi mobile biological weapons laboratories? Iraqi yellowcake uranium from Niger? Iraqi meetings in Prague? All were false. All were traceable to Tel Aviv. Are you still having trouble connecting the dots?[/U][/B] As the U.S. sinks into bankruptcy, we are ridiculed abroad for failing to acknowledge the obvious: [I]Americans have long been the target of a fraud operated by Israelis, pro-Israelis and those supportive of their goals for the region. [/I] What better way to wage war on the U.S. than from within? How else can Israel expand except by duping its super power ally to wage wars for Greater Israel? Never mind the cost in blood and treasure. As an ally, the U.S. is easily portrayed as guilty by association. Those promoting the Crotch Bomber scare are part of the problem. In the Information Age, this latest false flag operation is typical of how treason proceeds in plain sight yet, to date, with impunity. Those media outlets marketing this latest lie are an enemy within. [I] -- Jeff Gates is author of Guilt By Association, Democracy at Risk and The Ownership Solution. See [URL="http://www.criminalstate.com"]www.criminalstate.com[/URL]. He was counsel to the US Senate Committee on Finance (1980-87).[/I] [/quote] No, I can't tl;dr this. I highly recommend reading it [I]all[/I] before you post. If you only read a bit of it; don't bother posting at all.

You'll notice the source is Al-Jazeera, which does not like Israel. I question the accuracy of this article.

[QUOTE=Alan Ninja!;20234944]You'll notice the source is Al-Jazeera, which we all know does not like Israel. I question the accuracy of this article.[/QUOTE] who's we?

[QUOTE=Alan Ninja!;20234944]You'll notice the source is Al-Jazeera, which we all know does not like Israel. I question the accuracy of this article.[/QUOTE] That's a fallacy, base your decision on the article itself rather then disregarding its supporting arguments.

Oh look, Al-Jazeera is blaming the Jews for something, haven't seen that before.

Does alJazeera have a track record of blatantly making stuff up though? Being biased and being wrong are different. If this turns out to be true, it's going to be huge.

why do my people have to be so hated

I guess that was done by a n[b]otch[/b]

It frightens me that you guys seem to be taking an Al Jazeera article more serious than a Fox News article. Eh I don't know. I'm just not sure if Al Jazeera can be taken seriously.

^ That was my point exactly.

[QUOTE=OvB;20236093]It frightens me that you guys seem to be taking an Al Jazeera article more serious than a Fox News article. Eh I don't know. I'm just not sure if Al Jazeera can be taken seriously.[/QUOTE] Al Jazeera is the most bullshit source ever I'd rather listen to Ann Coulter telling why Islam is bad in 24 hour rotation being glued to a chair, rather than read one article of Al Jazeera.

You'd think after the 9/11 slip-up the government would either have been more careful or stopped attacking their own country. It's almost as if this story was pulled out of the reporter's ass while he was wearing [i]nothing at all![/i] [img]http://imgkk.com/i/t1S.jpg[/img]

I like how the article makes all these claims without citing any sources.

Its an Arab fox news. The amount of fox news that gets posted here and not called out as bullshit means that there is nothing wrong with it.

Crotch Bomber sounds like a cheap porno.

They ask legitimate questions. He was never going to bring down a plane with a little wad of PETN hidden under his nutsack. Everything about the guy put up a red flag. The War on Terror has already been proven to have been conducted on the basis of a staggering number of lies. Makes you think.

[QUOTE=Used Car Salesman;20240046]Makes you think.[/QUOTE] Or does it? These are the questions.

Al Jazeera is staffed by a lot of ex-BBC/CNN workers and their reporting is pretty highly reputable. if you notice, that website seems different than their main English language site: [url]http://english.aljazeera.net/[/url] ..which is a pretty excellent source of news, especially for world news. At the bottom of the OP's page, you can see this: [quote]AlJazeera.com and AlJazeera Magazine are registered trade marks of AlJazeera Publishing, an independent media organisation established in 1992 in London[/quote] According to Wikipedia, Al Jazeera was founded in 1996 and is based out of Qatar, not the UAE. This magazine is an entirely different organization and the name is just a coincidence it seems. My point is, though, a lot of you are predisposed to lump Al Jazeera in with the likes of Fox, and they really don't deserve the disdain. They're a pretty fucking good news site; hell, recently they were the first to break the story about that video of those Nigerian extrajudicial executions.

[QUOTE=Used Car Salesman;20240046]He was never going to bring down a plane with a little wad of PETN hidden under his nutsack.[/QUOTE] He had 80g of PETN. 100g of PETN can destroy a car. [url]http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/dec/27/petn-pentaerythritol-trinitrate-explosive[/url] Watch this video that CNN did. It shows what just 6g of PETN can do: [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2IhXYUV4Vkw[/url]

[QUOTE=Pvt. Ryan;20244111]Al Jazeera is staffed by a lot of ex-BBC/CNN workers and their reporting is pretty highly reputable. if you notice, that website seems different than their main English language site: [/QUOTE] Maybe there's a reason why they're ex-workers?

So Jews did do 9/11? This is a surprise to say the least.

[QUOTE=thisispain;20244995]So Jews did do 9/11? This is a surprise to say the least.[/QUOTE] You know your conspiracy may lack validity when an internet meme beat you to it.