I dont understand.
Also is this the ingame speed ?
It looks like its in slow motion.
I don't like DOTA 2 to be honest.
Pretty much a Fail/Awesome save.
He missed the hook but saved his friend from the tower and a gank.
and he got hooked before he hit the ground so the enemy never took any damage.
perfect timing
[QUOTE=genyus;33552378]I dont understand.
Also is this the ingame speed ?
It looks like its in slow motion.[/QUOTE]
yeah it's slowed down to about half speed
[QUOTE=genyus;33552378]I dont understand.
Also is this the [B]ingame speed[/B] ?
It looks like its in slow motion.[/QUOTE]
obviously not... i slowed it a bit so you could see
[editline]3rd December 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=ScoutKing;33552419]I don't like DOTA 2 to be honest.[/QUOTE]
any reason?
[QUOTE=Sumaher4;33553842]
any reason?[/QUOTE]
I don't like RTS style games. and the art style looks meh, and the gameplay looks meh too.
DOTA 2 should be developed by blizzard, a company that is known for its RTS games, not valve, that is known for its FPS games, that they are neglecting right now by developing this.
The new CS doesn't look too great either, looks like a re-skin to be honest.
Valve is slowly losing their footing in what made them great it seems.
Half life.
not this RTS style game that looks "meh", that splits the fan-base, while making a reskin of CSS.
So that's why i don't like DOTA 2, I think it's a bad move on valve's part. and I don't like RTS games.
[QUOTE=ScoutKing;33553970]I don't like RTS style games. and the art style looks meh, and the gameplay looks meh too.
DOTA 2 should be developed by blizzard, a company that is known for its RTS games, not valve, that is known for its FPS games, that they are neglecting right now by developing this.
The new CS doesn't look too great either, looks like a re-skin to be honest.
Valve is slowly losing their footing in what made them great it seems.
Half life.
not this RTS style game that looks "meh", that splits the fan-base, while making a reskin of CSS.
So that's why i don't like DOTA 2, I think it's a bad move on valve's part. and I don't like RTS games.[/QUOTE]
I dunno if you don't like RTS games I don't know how to help you. Valve isn't a company built to pump out sequels to their established franchises either. I'm sure it gets very boring working on FPS games all the time.
Though I don't know anything about DOTA 2, Warcraft, or League of Legends so this is me judging it from a distance.
[QUOTE=ScoutKing;33553970]I don't like RTS style games. and the art style looks meh, and the gameplay looks meh too.
DOTA 2 should be developed by blizzard, a company that is known for its RTS games, not valve, that is known for its FPS games, that they are neglecting right now by developing this.
The new CS doesn't look too great either, looks like a re-skin to be honest.
Valve is slowly losing their footing in what made them great it seems.
Half life.
not this RTS style game that looks "meh", that splits the fan-base, while making a reskin of CSS.
So that's why i don't like DOTA 2, I think it's a bad move on valve's part. and I don't like RTS games.[/QUOTE]
They make 2 games that you find are bad and now they are " losing their footing in what made them great"...
[QUOTE=ScoutKing;33553970]I don't like RTS style games. and the art style looks meh, and the gameplay looks meh too.
DOTA 2 should be developed by blizzard, a company that is known for its RTS games, not valve, that is known for its FPS games, that they are neglecting right now by developing this.
The new CS doesn't look too great either, looks like a re-skin to be honest.
Valve is slowly losing their footing in what made them great it seems.
Half life.
not this RTS style game that looks "meh", that splits the fan-base, while making a reskin of CSS.
So that's why i don't like DOTA 2, I think it's a bad move on valve's part. and I don't like RTS games.[/QUOTE]
wowowow !
do you know what you're even saying??
1sst of all: Blizzard was not the creator of DotA - thats damn important and stick to it...
Creators of DotA were 1st Eul then Guinsoo and then when those two left, came Icefrog , they used the map Editor which came along Warcraft III Roc and TFT , IceFrog (which currently is with Valves team if you don't know) carried on developing the game after version 6.
thats that
2nd of All the game is not even [B]HALF[/B] finished!
thats why they have old school players like us who played the 1st dota to give feedback on how the game is and how they can improve it, ofc we got some newcomers feedback as well.
So gather up some knowledge and then talk
Blizzards Only RTS game I personally know is Diablo , whic yea... is quite good , but still
[QUOTE=ScoutKing;33553970]I don't like RTS style games. and the art style looks meh, and the gameplay looks meh too.[/QUOTE]
Just curious how the art style looks meh?
Looks quite awesome to me.
In this thread judging unreleased unfinished games.
guys have a look on my other vid , and see how you like that , (the game itself, refering to you ScoutKing)
[QUOTE=Swebonny;33554066]They make 2 games that you find are bad and now they are " losing their footing in what made them great"...[/QUOTE]
I found the previous few releases meh too.
L4d 1/2 for example.
Portal 2 was great, but short.
Just valve is slowly losing my support recently.
You can get butt hurt about it if you want. but i just find valve seems to be losing what made them great.
Half-life.
Ok ... We apologise on Valves behalf that you do not enjoy their games ...
Are you happy? go play now whtvr you like , cause most of the community here will probably go against you
[QUOTE=Sumaher4;33554083]
Blizzards Only RTS game I personally know is Diablo , which yea... is quite good , but still[/QUOTE]
Starcraft, Warcraft 1,2,3, starcraft 2, Diablo 1 and 2. and World of warcraft is one to a degree.
[editline]3rd December 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=Sumaher4;33554478]Ok ... We apologise on Valves behalf that you do not enjoy their games ...
Are you happy? go play now whtvr you like , cause most of the community here will probably go against you[/QUOTE]
Jesus, learn to spell.
What*
[QUOTE=ScoutKing;33554508]Starcraft, Warcraft 1,2,3, starcraft 2, Diablo 1 and 2. and World of warcraft is one to a degree.
[editline]3rd December 2011[/editline]
Jesus, learn to spell.
What*[/QUOTE]
are you stupid or messing with me?
real time strategy is not the same thing as starcraft , warcraft or wow....
and i spelled it like that cause thats how I type in chat , for short( i know its dumb but i kinda got used to it now)
and it's not What but whatever
[QUOTE=RaDiVaX;33554151]Just curious how the art style looks meh?
Looks quite awesome to me.[/QUOTE]
The art style has a lot of effort put into it, that is for sure.
You can tell they spent a long time modeling and textureing
Just the direction it is going just doesn't really perk my fancy.
[QUOTE=ScoutKing;33554445]I found the previous few releases meh too.
L4d 1/2 for example.
Portal 2 was great, but short.
Just valve is slowly losing my support recently.
You can get butt hurt about it if you want. but i just find valve seems to be losing what made them great.
Half-life.[/QUOTE]
Oh man they deleted Half-Life off of Steam?! No wait... It's still there. They aren't "losing" Half-Life. It may be taking a god awful long time, but they haven't released a bad HL title yet.
The Left 4 Dead series is exactly what I expected it to be. Its a fun co-op game that doesn't really take itself seriously.
I agree about Portal 2 though I think even in that short game Valve proved they still have talent.
[QUOTE=Sumaher4;33554546]are you stupid or messing with me?
real time strategy is not the same thing as starcraft , warcraft or wow....
and i spelled it like that cause thats how I type in chat , for short( i know its dumb but i kinda got used to it now)
and it's not What but whatever[/QUOTE]
How is starcraft NOT an rts ?!
I understand for WoW but starcraft ?
[QUOTE=Sumaher4;33554546]are you stupid or messing with me?
real time strategy is not the same thing as starcraft , warcraft or wow....
and i spelled it like that cause thats how I type in chat , for short( i know its dumb but i kinda got used to it now)
and it's not What but whatever[/QUOTE]
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/StarCraft[/url]
"StarCraft is a military science fiction [B]real-time strategy [/B]video game developed by Blizzard Entertainment. "
It's considered a RTS.
and
"and i spelled it like that cause thats how I type in chat , for short( i know its dumb but i kinda got used to it now)"
Is making me struggle to take you serious in any light, because if your so lazy to spell out "whatever" you must severely lack something.
You may call me dumb for having an opinion about DOTA 2, but you must be servery handicapped for failing to spell a basic word like that due to laziness.
[QUOTE=genyus;33554616]How is starcraft NOT an rts ?!
I understand for WoW but starcraft ?[/QUOTE]
Yeah I don't get it either. Also we aren't talking about WoW we're talking about the Warcraft games that came before the MMO.
its different!!! how can starcraft and dota be the same?!?!?
i mean look on how the games are played, dota has 103 heroes to choose from and play individually and lvl them up , up to 25 , where in starctaft you get like control over many untis and lead them to atack or defend
[QUOTE=Sumaher4;33554656]its different!!! how can starcraft and dota be the same?!?!?
i mean on how the games are payed, dota has 103 heroes to choose from and play individually and lvl them up , up to 25 , where in starctaft you get like control over many untis and lead them to atack or defend[/QUOTE]
Leveling up isn't a criteria for a RTS.
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real-time_strategy[/url]
what happened here lol
bloody hell ,
let's stick to the fact that they're are totally different.
by the way Rock Paper Scissors said it was an RTS genre
[QUOTE=DoneZ;33554643]Yeah I don't get it either. Also we aren't talking about WoW we're talking about the Warcraft games that came before the MMO.[/QUOTE]
This thread just makes me want to punch my screen
Some dumbass kid saying Starcraft isnt an rts deserve this friendly festival were getting :D
Its like that thread in hardware section
Computer Illiterate
Some people just want to shove their knowledge down your throat even tho they are wrong
[QUOTE=DoneZ;33554605]Oh man they deleted Half-Life off of Steam?! No wait... It's still there. They aren't "losing" Half-Life. It may be taking a god awful long time, but they haven't released a bad HL title yet.
The Left 4 Dead series is exactly what I expected it to be. Its a fun co-op game that doesn't really take itself seriously.
I agree about Portal 2 though I think even in that short game Valve proved they still have talent.[/QUOTE]
L4d just didn't seem too amazing to be frank.
It's going to be 5 years soon since they left the fan base with a bad taste in their mouth from that cliff hanger at the end of EP2, I'd rather not see a CSS remake, or DOTA 2 being worked on. I would rather see valve wrap up the series that's taken them so far, not neglect it and get a kick out of trolling their fans about it.
It's my opinion, and I understand your opinion. I just feel like valve should really give the HL series some PR again, instead of splitting the fan base apart by reskinning CS and picking up and IP that isn't really an FPS.
I know valve is trying to expand in the types of games they put out, but in doing so, i feel like they could be sacrificing some of the things that makes their games great.
The Dota genre is a sub-genre of [B]real-time strategy[/B] video games, characterized by their likeness to Defense of the Ancients, a custom scenario for Warcraft 3 drawing from both [B]real-time strategy[/B] and [U]role-playing[/U] game influences. Compared to traditional [B]real-time strategy[/B] games, elements such as base management, resource collection and army building have been removed. Action The Dota genre is a sub-genre of real-time strategy video games, characterized by their likeness to Defense of the Ancients, a custom scenario for Warcraft 3 drawing from both real-time strategy and role-playing game influences. Compared to traditional real-time strategy games, elements such as base management, resource collection and army building have been removed. Action [B]real-time strategy[/B] (Action RTS or ARTS) is sometimes used to refer to the Dota genre. (Action RTS or ARTS) is sometimes used to refer to the Dota genre.
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dota_(genre)[/url]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
