Watched 20 minutes of it
Obama: Let's fix education and the economy
Romney: Yo all that shit I said over the last year and a half, I didn't mean any of it. I wanna do what Obama wants to do because it will get me votes
[QUOTE=legolover122;37904114]Can someone explain this to me?[/QUOTE]
Romney has been replaced with Hitler as if Romney is Hitler
With Obama bad-mouthing the way things are today, you would think Romney has been president the last 4 years... woops.
When even Msnbc and Bill Maher can't find anything good to say about Obama's performance tonight... and people have to resort to these silly childish attacks to somehow even things out instead of, oh i don't know, maybe a rebuttal of accurate figures and corrections to the misinformation.... you know he fucked up severely.
Review the facts and fiction at [url]http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/10/presidential-debate-2012-live-blog-and-fact-or-fiction/[/url]
[QUOTE=Lost_n_found;37904434]With Obama bad-mouthing the way things are today, you would think Romney has been president the last 4 years... woops.
When even Msnbc and Bill Maher can't find anything good to say about Obama's performance tonight... and people have to resort to these silly childish attacks to somehow even things out instead of, oh i don't know, maybe a rebuttal of accurate figures and corrections to the misinformation.... you know he fucked up severely.
Review the facts and fiction at [url]http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/10/presidential-debate-2012-live-blog-and-fact-or-fiction/[/url][/QUOTE]
Well, frankly I think you're a dumbass. That's pretty much proven by Mitt Romney saying he wants to invest in cleaning up coal to create jobs and support the environment as opposed to invest in companies such as Tesla and Fisker.
Since coal can be cleaned at all???... Guy has no common sense.
Obama kept giving facts about Romney's plan and his own that no American has the time or patience to check.
Then Romney would say "No that's not right you aren't entitled to your [I]own[/I] facts", and then tell us the opposite.
And the cycle continues and I'll never know who was telling the truth about their respective plans...
[QUOTE=rrunyan;37904514]Obama kept giving facts about Romney's plan and his own that no American has the time or patience to check.
Then Romney would say "No that's not right you aren't entitled to your [I]own[/I] facts", and then tell us the opposite.
And the cycle continues and I'll never know who was telling the truth about their respective plans...[/QUOTE]
At least one side chose to use facts and statistics that could be referred to as opposed to ramble on about how changing absolutely nothing involving the tax over middle class and upper class families could solve the deficit and create revenue?
Oh.. Let's cut income tax to fund mentally deficient programs like cleaning a nonrenewable resource where jobs are created for people who want to die of lung cancer for 7 dollars an hour.
In a nutshell, if Romney got into office, you'd be looking at everything being undone all within the first term. We'd be right back where we started when that fuckass George W. Bush got out of office and we'd be right on a road to hell.
[QUOTE=stupidass;37904510]
Since coal can be cleaned at all???[/QUOTE]
You should really at least try a one second google search before you speak to avoid having to shove your foot in your mouth.
[I]Clean coal is any technology that may reduce emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gasses that arise from the burning of coal for electrical power. Typically, the term clean coal is used in reference to carbon capture and storage, which pumps and stores CO2 emissions underground, and to plants using an Integrated gasification combined cycle, which gasifies coal to reduce CO2 emissions.[/I]
[QUOTE=Lost_n_found;37904581]You should really at least try a one second google search before you speak to avoid having to shove your foot in your mouth.
[I]Clean coal is any technology that may [b]reduce[/b] emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gasses that arise from the burning of coal for electrical power. Typically, the term clean coal is used in reference to carbon capture and storage, which pumps and stores CO2 emissions underground, and to plants using an Integrated gasification combined cycle, which gasifies coal to [b]reduce[/b] CO2 emissions.[/I][/QUOTE]
Or perhaps you should stop trying to justify the facts with a minuscule and unproven argument? Whether emissions are released into the atmosphere or not still does not completely diminish the idea that blowing up the side of a mountain in search of a nonrenewable resource is environmentally harmful.
I put in bold what is wrong. Until coal's effect on the environment is completely beneficial (which it never will be), clean, renewable resources being researched by companies such as Tesla are far more understandable to invest it.
[QUOTE=stupidass;37904546]At least one side chose to use facts and statistics that could be referred to as opposed to ramble on about how changing absolutely nothing involving the tax over middle class and upper class families could solve the deficit and create revenue?
[/QUOTE]
This sentence started off as a statement and ended as a question.
So once again I won't know which side was right ;-;
[QUOTE=stupidass;37904607]Or perhaps you should stop trying to justify the facts with a minuscule and unproven argument? Whether emissions are released into the atmosphere or not still does not completely diminish the idea that blowing up the side of a mountain in search of a nonrenewable resource is environmentally harmful.[/QUOTE]
The "unproven argument" that plants take in CO2 and give off oxygen? lol
I thought we were talking about clean coal, or 'cleaner' coal if it makes you happy, we were talking about hydraulic fracturing?
[editline]3rd October 2012[/editline]
I'm all for clean energy like solar and wind. Problem is they are much more expensive to invest in. It's a shame Obama accepts money from these huge coal companies for campaign funds and doesn't go after them!
[editline]3rd October 2012[/editline]
But hey, I'm talking to a guy who calls himself StupidAss. I must be the fool to engage in such a conversation and think it will go anywhere.
[QUOTE=Lost_n_found;37904642]The "unproven argument" that plants take in CO2 and give off oxygen? lol
I thought we were talking about clean coal, or 'cleaner' coal if it makes you happy, we were talking about hydraulic fracturing?
[editline]3rd October 2012[/editline]
I'm all for clean energy like solar and wind. Problem is they are much more expensive to invest in. It's a shame Obama accepts money from these huge coal companies for campaign funds and doesn't go after them!
[editline]3rd October 2012[/editline]
[b]But hey, I'm talking to a guy who calls himself StupidAss. I must be the fool to engage in such a conversation and think it will go anywhere.[/b][/QUOTE]
Your credibility ----> The drain.
[QUOTE=stupidass;37904700]Your credibility ----> The drain.[/QUOTE]
Well, you are LITERALLY going by the handle "stupidass". I doubt your credibility (and maturity) from the start.
[QUOTE=stupidass;37904700]Your credibility ----> The drain.[/QUOTE]
coal, no matter how "clean" it is will always be less productive and clean as solar, wind, etc.
and not to mention it uses a fuckton of coal holy cow
I found it great how Obama brought up the fact that Obama care was originally Romney's idea. Made me laugh. Btw at the guy who said Obama bad mouthed how things are today, did you even watch the debate?? Romney was the one saying "Obama is doing it wrong, my plan will fix everything!!!" , but yet Romney never went into detail on how his plan would accomplish everything he claimed it would do... oh and don't even get me started when he was saying all the things he would cut government funding on. He mentioned PBS and I laughed so hard.
Romney is a dumb ass...
Look Obama, that's nice and all, what you've been saying about cutting tax-cuts and cleaner energy sources, [I]but I know a plumber in Illinois...[/I]
I am Voting Obama, but I have to say Romney took the debate. Yes many of his facts are not accurate and he has continued to flip flop, but he got the best sound bites and came off smoother (Obama said "Um" a lot and stuttered a bit). The people who are going to change their opinions over a debate are not the kind of people who do a lot of fact checking or seek unbiased sources.
[video=youtube;11v9pVvJdaQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcMWnNcOxg4&feature=player_embedded[/video]
This was in the related and frankly It's more accurate.
Romney really didn't seem that much worse than Obama, other than the no social healthcare shit, fuck him for that.
[QUOTE=carcarcargo;37908988]Romney really didn't seem that much worse than Obama, other than the no social healthcare shit, fuck him for that.[/QUOTE]
Obama isn't going to implement any sort of social healthcare system. The few entitlement programs we have like Medicare and Medicaid are our biggest problems right now.
Mainly because we only have half the country paying for them and they're the same people with tax breaks.
[QUOTE=fuckingcake;37904343]Romney has been replaced with Hitler as if Romney is Hitler[/QUOTE]
So Mittler Rommel right?
[QUOTE=stupidass;37904510]as opposed to invest in companies such as Tesla and Fisker.[/QUOTE]
Tesla motors has gotten BILLIONS in government aid, and has barely shipped any product to show for it.
EDIT: Hey look, relevant article...
[url]http://jalopnik.com/5949083/is-mitt-romney-correct-that-tesla-motors-and-fisker-are-failures[/url]
I find this offensive, comparing Romney to Hitler is going too far, Hitler is a much better and respectable man then Romney.
Yup that's me.
[QUOTE=stupidass;37904607]
I put in bold what is wrong. Until coal's effect on the environment is completely beneficial (which it never will be), clean, renewable resources being researched by companies such as Tesla are far more understandable to invest it.[/QUOTE]
The government shouldn't be investing in anything beyond research anyway, honestly I think both candidates' positions on energy sucks
It's funny because presidents are just mascots nowadays.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
