• YouTube video by "Anonymous" hacker group threatens to attack Singapore
    28 replies, posted
[h=1][media][URL]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4ZhPxvPNK4[/URL][/media][/h] [QUOTE]A YouTube video put up by someone claiming to be part of the international hacker group Anonymous is threatening to bring down key infrastructure in Singapore in a show of protest against the Government's new licensing rules imposed on websites here.The video, posted on Oct 29, also urged Singaporeans to join the protest by dressing in black and red on November 5 and to black out their Facebook profile pictures for a day. The message was delivered on video using an image of Guy Fawkes with his trademark anonymity mask, saying: "We demand you reconsider the regulations of your framework or we will be forced to go to war with you." It ended with the message: "Remember, remember. The fifth of November", a famous line from Fawkes who threatened to blow the parliament building in England on November 5, 1605.[/QUOTE] [URL]http://www.straitstimes.com/breaking-news/singapore/story/youtube-video-anonymous-hacker-group-threatens-attack-singapore-201310[/URL] If there's one government you don't fuck with, it's our government. Because the government here don't take stuff like this lightly.
I can't take those masks seriously. Even before the whole "Le Reddit Mask" thing the face looked too funny to take seriously.
anyone can put on a Guy Fawkes mask and say "I am anonymous pls take me seriously" because people automatically assume anyone who uses that label is a ~dangerous cyberterrorist~ when, more likely than not, it's just some script kiddy who'll try and ddos their websites or something
[QUOTE=Ignhelper;42711966] If there's one government you don't fuck with, it's our government. Because the government here don't take stuff like this lightly.[/QUOTE] What exactly are they going to do?
[QUOTE=sloppy_joes;42712040]What exactly are they going to do?[/QUOTE] DDOS your website, presumably.
[QUOTE=sloppy_joes;42712040]What exactly are they going to do?[/QUOTE] They'll probably try to hunt them down. The bad part isn't finding them, its when they get caught and get a bloody long sentence. Oh and shitloads of caning.
[QUOTE=Ignhelper;42712090]They'll probably try to hunt them down. The bad part isn't finding them, its when they get caught and get a bloody long sentence. Oh and shitloads of caning.[/QUOTE] Yeah but assumably this is like 3 guys representing "anonymous" who will be sending angry emails and renting botnets to DDOS shit. Not a lot Singapore can do.
[QUOTE=KingOfScience;42712026]anyone can put on a Guy Fawkes mask and say "I am anonymous pls take me seriously" because people automatically assume anyone who uses that label is a ~dangerous cyberterrorist~ when, more likely than not, it's just some script kiddy who'll try and ddos their websites or something[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=sloppy_joes;42712111]Yeah but assumably this is like 3 guys representing "anonymous" who will be sending angry emails and renting botnets to DDOS shit. Not a lot Singapore can do.[/QUOTE] Why is it that when 'Anonymous' is doing vigilante action like with the rape case people Facepunchers start rallying around the flag, but when it's 'Anonymous' threatening something stupid or getting arrested suddenly it's just a couple of people who don't represent the group?
[QUOTE=catbarf;42712176]Why is it that when 'Anonymous' is doing vigilante action like with the rape case people Facepunchers start rallying around the flag, but when it's 'Anonymous' threatening something stupid or getting arrested suddenly it's just a couple of people who don't represent the group?[/QUOTE] When did "facepunch" become one collective hivemind?
[QUOTE=sloppy_joes;42712188]When did "facepunch" become one collective hivemind?[/QUOTE] When did "Anonymous" become one collective hivemind?
[QUOTE=Alec W;42712271]When did "Anonymous" become one collective hivemind?[/QUOTE] Isn't that the point?
That sounded like it was written by a 12 year old threatening someone on deviantart.
[QUOTE=sloppy_joes;42712188]When did "facepunch" become one collective hivemind?[/QUOTE] Normally I'm loathe to make generalizations but compare the responses in [url=http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1315456]this thread[/url] to the ones in [url=http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1312754]this thread[/url]. It's night and day. One thread is basically 'YEAH GO ANONYMOUS' and the other is 'UGH ANONYMOUS ISN'T A GROUP'.
[QUOTE=omegasupreme1;42711977]I can't take those masks seriously. Even before the whole "Le Reddit Mask" thing the face looked too funny to take seriously.[/QUOTE] Warner Brothers is making millions off it too.
-snip-
[URL="https://www.google.ca/search?q=Kelvin+Tan+Thiam+Teck&espv=210&es_sm=122&source=lnms&sa=X&ei=bMxyUqGBKYLcyQGsnIE4&ved=0CAgQ_AUoAA&biw=1920&bih=955&dpr=1"]Mr. anonymous isn't very anonymous[/URL]
Does this remind anybody else of the IT crowd finale? [editline]31st October 2013[/editline] this is the pinnacle of edge
[QUOTE=catbarf;42712176]Why is it that when 'Anonymous' is doing vigilante action like with the rape case people Facepunchers start rallying around the flag, but when it's 'Anonymous' threatening something stupid or getting arrested suddenly it's just a couple of people who don't represent the group?[/QUOTE] because 'anonymous' is a symbol rather than organization. that creates a more personal relationship and perception of what 'anonymous' means to them.
[QUOTE=sloppy_joes;42712040]What exactly are they going to do?[/QUOTE] It involves yellow cake... ...and not the tasty kind.
[QUOTE=Killuah;42712381]Warner Brothers is making millions off it too.[/QUOTE] [url]http://www.thingiverse.com/search?q=low+poly+mask&sa=[/url] Some people have decided to circumvent that little talked about fact.
Haha, that quote at the beginning.
[QUOTE=sloppy_joes;42712188]When did "facepunch" become one collective hivemind?[/QUOTE] when did the facepunch hivemind start saying that like it appeared overnight and now it's the standard reply to any of these posts even though it's still a valid question
I must say, these videos, with all these crappy, childish effects are kind of cute, i would take it much more seriously if it was presented in a more BBC news style, without the stupid lines etc... just... grow up Anon and let me take you more seriously...
[QUOTE=supersnail11;42716027]when did the facepunch hivemind start saying that like it appeared overnight and now it's the standard reply to any of these posts even though it's still a valid question[/QUOTE] You just made some shit up and tried to pin it on me. The issue is that there is no defined group "anonymous," anybody can say they represent anonymous but in reality they might just be working with a small group of friends. Historically people just say they represent all of anonymous to gain media attention, when in reality it's just a few people. It's like free publicity.
We teach your childrens
[QUOTE=omegasupreme1;42711977]Even before the whole "Le Reddit Mask" thing [/QUOTE] Pretty sure 'anon' has been using the Guy Fawkes mask before Reddit existed.
I love it when people try to appear serious but use that one distinctive Sony Vegas 'television screen' effect.
[QUOTE]an image of Guy Fawkes with his trademark anonymity mask[/QUOTE] what
anonymous should cut this white knight bullshit out.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.